Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Достигай с ИИ и Артуром

@dostigatelrf

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

13,410subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001150932931
TypeChannel
Username@dostigatelrf
DescriptionБольшой блог про ИИ-сотрудников 👉 https://aibotmanager.ru Забирай 22+ статей про заработок на цифровых сотрудниках🤖
Created15 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dostigatelrf

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@omegabiznes/141322 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC@dostigatelrf/3423 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC1.003 minutes
@omegabiznes/141822 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC@dostigatelrf/3428 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC1.004 minutes
@dostigatelrf/3429 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC@omegabiznes/141923 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC1.002 minutes
@dostigatelrf/3431 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC@omegabiznes/142124 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC1.0072 seconds
@dostigatelrf/3433 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC@omegabiznes/142325 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC1.002 minutes
@dostigatelrf/3435 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC@omegabiznes/142526 Jul 2026, 05:04 UTC1.002 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@omegabiznes19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (127)
@peregovornaya_dostigatel18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (108)
@biznes1community16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (106)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 21 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @omegabiznes. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,41013,42413,4177 August 2026 — 13,424 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,424 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,423 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,419 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,412 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,410 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 6 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,408–13,426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:3513,410-2
12 Aug 2026, 03:3513,412-7
10 Aug 2026, 02:2813,419-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:4113,423-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:4513,424no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:3713,424first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.05%
avg views ÷ 13,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
141
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (22 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,103
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
270
Videos
129
Links
292

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3h 22m
Average length
33m 41s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1352.0%
624.0%
312.0%
💯312.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

МЫ СЭКОНОМИМ КЛИЕНТУ 240 000 ₽ В ГОД 🎸 🤔 Как вы думаете, сколько стоит оплата CRM в год, а сколько коммерс потратит в пятилетку на содержание amoCRM или Битрикса? Очень и очень много, стоимость содержания такой CRM-ки в долгосрок выходит как машина, причём машину ты хотя бы можешь продать, а тут просто платишь и платишь... ⚡️Мы предложили разработать полностью под ключ, свою, и разработка своей системы автоматом у

🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC101 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

КИТАЙСКИЙ KIMI K3 ЛОМАЕТ РЫНОК? 🔖 Купили мы на тест и на связку по ханту клиентов на Авито подписку за 10к на KIMI K3 и всё не так однозначно... Из каждой трубы крики о том - китайцы захватили рынок нейронок, KIMI уничтожает Claude, она дешёвая и так далее Ну верить слепо на выходе бенчмаркам и прочей шелухе неправильно, это маркетинг чистой воды. Снять бенчи через пару дней или недель после выхода тупо, как миним

🔥32

7 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC194 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎁 10 договоров за первый месяц. Кейс, который можно показывать клиенту вместо презентации Продолжаю про то, чем ученики VICE закрывают вопрос «покажите ваши работы». Второй кейс - строительная компания Север Строй, Тюмень. Один аккаунт на Авито, ни одного дополнительного менеджера в переписке 🎁 Что внутри кейса: ✍️ 10 подписанных договоров на хозблоки за первый месяц, средний чек от 100 000 ₽ ✍️ 387 диалогов, из

🔥31

5 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC207 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ищем клиентов на Авито, не потратив на трафик ни рубля ⚡️⚡️⚡️ И это не кликбейт: 700 объявлений пропахано, 100 бизнесов найдено, 8 лидов уже в работе - выводим на созвоны и закрываем в оплаты. СХЕМА ЖИВЕТ ТОЛЬКО ПЕРВЫЕ ПОЛТОРА ДНЯ ❗️ 🎉 Зачем вообще всё это. Платить за трафик мы не хотели не потому, что жлобы. Нужна была связка, с которой ученик может искать клиентов почти на халяву - без бюджета на рекламу, только

🔥3💯2

5 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC168 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Тебе не нужны свои кейсы, чтобы начать продавать Главный стопор у новичка звучит так: «а что я покажу бизнесу, у меня же ничего нет». Логично. Только это решаемо. Ученики VICE получают право показывать наши боевые кейсы как своё портфолио. Не скриншоты из интернета, не чужие картинки с конференций, а живые проекты с цифрами, снятыми прямо с серверов. Первый из них - производство хозблоков Woodart, Краснодар. 🎮

2

31 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC231 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Это конец? Или мы только начали? 🔖 🕛 Сидел вчера, вспоминал, что было год назад. Ни Claude Code, ни Codex, ничего не было. Открывали в браузере ChatGPT, писали промты руками и удивлялись тому, что приходит в ответ. Искали «секретные промты», делились ими как находками. А сделать картинку нейросетью было пиком технологий. Люди офигевали, каждый писал рилсы про картинки) Прошёл год, картинкой сегодня не удивишь вооб

🔥21💯1

28 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC223 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔖 Через 5 часов цена на связку поднимается в последний раз В полночь ценник встанет намертво. 29 июля это финал, дальше он не двигается ни вниз, ни по акциям, ни по личным договорённостям. ⚡️ Коротко, что ты вообще забираешь. Не курс и не папку с уроками, а рабочую связку. ИИ-продавец садится на твой Авито и работает круглосуточно, разбирает переписки, отсекает пустых, доводит живого человека до замера или до звонк

26 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC216 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔜 Последние часы, и дальше я закрываю набор по-настоящему, без «ну ладно, ещё денёк». Скажу напоследок главное, ради чего всё затевалось. Ты покупаешь не информацию и не доступ к урокам. Ты покупаешь актив - машину, которая уже доказала, что работает, в двух разных бизнесах, в двух городах, у двух разных владельцев. ⚡️ Эту машину невозможно «не применить». Она либо стоит у клиента и приносит ему заявки, либо нет. Б

1

26 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC169 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Сегодня последний день набора, вечером закрываю двери, и вместе с ними сгорают все бонусы окна. ❌Что уходит вместе с ними. Готовый ИИ-продавец, снятый с двух живых проектов, отдел из семи агентов и система продаж с чеком от 100 000 рублей за проект. Цена финальная, Старт 55 000, Под ключ 105 000, VIP 250 000. Кто записан на Zoom-разбор, решаем на созвоне, остальным сюда - https://redlegion.ru/demo/avitosecret

25 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC176 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

▶️ Завтра я закрываю набор, поэтому скажу прямо и без давилова. Ты сейчас в одной из трёх точек 👇 🔖 Первая, тебе не зашло. Это нормально, просто закрой пост, обид нет. 🔖 Вторая, зашло, но ты ждёшь идеального момента, когда денег побольше, времени посвободнее, а уверенности пожирнее. Скажу честно, этот момент не наступит, он так не работает. Через полгода ты прочитаешь такой же пост, только дороже. 🔖 Третья, зашло

25 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC136 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌜 Если связка зашла, но сумма Под ключ сейчас не по карману, это не повод пролететь мимо. ☄️ На Старте ты получаешь ровно ту же связку и того же готового продавца, просто собираешь его своими руками по инструкциям, а не вместе с моей командой. Машина одна и та же, разница только в том, кто крутит гайки. 👑 Зайти с малого нормально, главное зайти. Сегодня последний день этой цены - https://redlegion.ru/demo/avitosecr

24 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC130 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

🥇 Тебе достаётся не бот, а целый отдел. Семь сотрудников, которые не просят зарплату Смотри, кто будет на тебя работать 👇 1️⃣ «Аудитор ниши» садится и разбирает нишу клиента, спрос, конкурентов, горячие запросы. То, на что живой аналитик потратил бы неделю. 2️⃣«Копирайтер» пишет продающие объявления под эту нишу. 3️⃣«Технарь» выкладывает их на Авито и запускает дешёвый трафик. 4️⃣«Тренер базы знаний» берёт сайт

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @dostigatelrf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Достигай с ИИ и Артуром” (@dostigatelrf), 13,410 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dostigatelrf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.