Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ANDREY DOSHA

@dosha_online

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,274subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001666580903
TypeChannel
Username@dosha_online
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dosha_online

Growth

1,2741,2751,274.57 August 2026 — 1,275 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,275 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,274 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,275 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,274 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,274–1,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:431,274-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:311,275+1
8 Aug 2026, 15:041,274-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:471,275no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:581,275first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8060.2%
🔥3022.6%
👍1410.5%
🤝32.26%
😎21.50%
🏆10.752%
👏10.752%
👨‍💻10.752%
🥰10.752%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 May 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,130 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

PPC-трафик в гемблинге – источник, о котором в индустрии почти не говорят🔥 Один байер с командой поддержки генерит $15 млн оборота в месяц и забирает $3 млн чистыми. Один человек, который разобрался в источнике, который большинство считает слишком сложным. Google PPC – это платная поисковая выдача. Клик в Tier-1 может стоить $50 и при этом давать ROI который Facebook не снился, но порог входа высокий, цикл запуска

4🔥4

8 May 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,100 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Начали наполнять наш TG-маркетплейс расходниками для работы с Google Ads. Публикуем только проверенные сервисы и подрядчиков, с которыми работаем сами и можем спокойно рекомендовать другим. Агентские кабинеты, фармы, прокси, карточные сервисы и многое другое. https://t.me/ppcclub_marketplace

👍2

1 May 2026, 23:48 UTC≈1,430 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Максимально спокойный день рождения) без суеты, большого количества друзей. Может я старею?)

10

21 Apr 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,920 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как создавалось лучшее сообщество для экспертов по PPC-трафику — PPC CLUB. Читать тут: https://inferra.media/blog/ppc-club-istoriya-andriy-dosha

7

21 Apr 2026, 19:18 UTC≈1,610 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавно ко мне обратились знакомые с идеей создать своё комьюнити по influence-трафику. Они какое-то время наблюдали за нашим @ppc_club : как он растёт, как внутри строится общение, как люди делятся опытом и реально помогают друг другу. В какой-то момент решили - «хотим так же, только в своей нише». Я конечно поделился тем, что у меня уже сработало: что важно на старте, что делать нужно/не нужно. Всего за 2 недели

🔥94

21 Apr 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Приветствую! Давно не выходил на связь 🙂 Заметил, что с ведением соцсетей и Telegram всегда есть своя волатильность: то есть время и вдохновение, то наоборот - полный штиль. Как всегда дохрена всего происходит, не успеваешь все фиксировать

9👍3🥰1

8 Apr 2026, 22:36 UTC≈1,440 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чаще всего на конфе в Варшаве мне говорили про мои рилсы) «Видел тебя в рилсах» «PPC Club - лучшее комьюнити для PPC-специалистов» «Не устаешь записывать сколько видео в день?» Никто не сказал и не спросил про коллаборации, последние выпуски с интервью, партнерские статьи и тд… Прошло полтора месяца, однозначно гипотеза работает.

12👍4😎2

4 Apr 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,480 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Конфа и все сайд-ивенты закончились. Хочется тишины и перезагрузки. Проведу выходные дома, а в понедельник обратно в работу!

14🔥2

1 Apr 2026, 16:54 UTC≈1,420 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Солд аут! Проходок больше нет, не пишите пожалуйста

🤝1

1 Apr 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,360 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ppc_clubPhoto

🌌 Sky Link Private Party — выше города, за пределами ожиданий 📍 LEVEL 27 · Варшава 🗓 1 апреля · 19:00 Устали от формальных мероприятий? Мы тоже. Поэтому Wild Wild Apps, Colibrix Partners и PPC Club собирают топовых игроков индустрии. Никаких сцен. Никаких микрофонов. Только живое общение, обмен инсайтами и знакомства, которые перерастают в партнёрства. 🔒 Только по приглашениям. Тщательно отобранный список гостей

1

1 Apr 2026, 09:48 UTC991 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Буду 2 дня на конфе, кто хочет пообщаться - пишите в лс

🔥3🏆1

30 Mar 2026, 21:58 UTC≈1,040 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Приехал с ивента от Palaimedia, мой первый ивент в этом году. Впереди еще 4 дня крутых ивентов и плотного нетворкинга. Буду на ивентах: 31.03 THE LEGENDS MEET-UP: Late night show edition 01.04 Sky Link Private Party by PPC.CLUB, WWG & Colibrix Partners 02.04 8HUB x AFFILIATE POLAND 03.04 1X | Fight Club | Yo Space И два дня конференции Conversion Conf Warsaw.

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dosha_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,214 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ANDREY DOSHA” (@dosha_online), 1,274 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dosha_online.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.