Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дорожный Контроль СПБ | ЛО

Channel

Дорожный Контроль СПБ | ЛО

@doroga_47

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,789subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209381540
TypeChannel
Username@doroga_47
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doroga_47

Growth

16,78916,90416,846.56 August 2026 — 16,904 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,904 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,899 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,894 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,888 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,881 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,887 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,881 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,880 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,879 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,869 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,861 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,853 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,841 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,836 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,825 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,821 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,816 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,818 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,813 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,811 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,810 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,811 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,807 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,802 subscribers7 September 2026 — 16,789 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 32 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,772–16,921 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 14:2016,789-13
4 Sept 2026, 17:4116,802-5
2 Sept 2026, 23:4916,807-4
1 Sept 2026, 18:1816,811+1
30 Aug 2026, 17:5816,810-1
29 Aug 2026, 17:4616,811-2
28 Aug 2026, 17:3616,813-5
27 Aug 2026, 14:2416,818+2
26 Aug 2026, 13:1216,816-5
25 Aug 2026, 09:3516,821-4
24 Aug 2026, 12:1416,825-11
22 Aug 2026, 22:2316,836-5
21 Aug 2026, 13:4716,841-12
20 Aug 2026, 11:3616,853-8
19 Aug 2026, 14:1616,861-8
18 Aug 2026, 17:4316,869-10
17 Aug 2026, 15:1616,879-1
16 Aug 2026, 05:5716,880-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:0516,881-6
12 Aug 2026, 23:5616,887first reading

Engagement

127 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 16,789 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.497%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 127 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 96 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held127 (3 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total197,889
Reactions total930
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 27s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,236 reactions across 120 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱25720.8%
19615.9%
🙏1088.74%
🤡1058.50%
👍887.12%
🕊504.05%
🤣483.88%
🤬473.80%
😭362.91%
👌332.67%
👏292.35%
🙈282.27%
🤯262.10%
👎252.02%
🔥252.02%
😢211.70%
😡201.62%
🏆171.38%
😁161.29%
🤝90.728%
19 further kinds524.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 121 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 127 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doroga_47. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 127 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.787%
1 of 127 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,990
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,960
over 126 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJSgjfw122 August 202622 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC289 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❌❌❌❌ Петербург массово перекроют 6 сентября из-за марафона «Пушкин — Петербург» В городе пройдёт один из старейших марафонов, поэтому на маршруте забега введут серьёзные ограничения движения. ➡️ Отправьте тем, кто собирается ехать по городу 6 сентября

🫡21🤬1

3 Sept 2026, 04:26 UTC≈1,080 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Смертельное дтп произошло на 38 км кад Предположительно, мазда залетела под грузовик

😱72👏1

2 Sept 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,710 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Московское шоссе, выезд из города. 2 дтп подряд

🙈42

2 Sept 2026, 06:06 UTC≈1,700 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Петровский 7. Видимо первое сентября настолько довело детей, что они решили исполнить опасный трюк на высоте. Родители, если узнаёте своих детей, объясните им что подобное деструктивное поведение рано или поздно может плохо закончится.

😁32

2 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC≈1,620 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

На съезде с КАД на Предпортовую горит автомобиль, сообщают читатели. Судя по данным «Яндекс Карт», на съезде образовалась пробка.

5😱3

1 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC≈2,150 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

⚡️ Мощный взрыв прогремел перед пожаром в районе Колтушей в Ленобласти По словам очевидцев, в здании обрушился потолок, а жалюзи погнулись от взрывной волны.

😱3

1 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTC≈1,970 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Краснопутиловская/Кубинская. Гольф испортил человеку рабочий день.

🤡7

1 Sept 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,970 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, Питер 💚 Погода на 1 сентября: Утром +16° Облачно с прояснениями ⛅️ Днём +21° Небольшой дождь 🌦 Вечером +19° Пасмурно ☁️ Ночью +16° Пасмурно ☁️ 💨 Ветер 3 м/с 💧 Влажность 75% 👉 Давление, мм рт. ст. 754 ☀️ Световой день длится сегодня 14ч 11мин 🕰 с 5:53 по 20:04

3👌3

31 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,050 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚠️ДТП с автобусом на Руставели, 51. Осталась одна полоса

2🏆1

31 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈2,240 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Поздним вечером 28 августа у дома 29 по Выборгской набережной в Санкт-Петербурге экипажем отдельного батальона дорожно-постовой службы Госавтоинспекции был замечен электромопед, водитель которого проигнорировал требование полицейских об остановке, увеличил скорость и попытался. Сотрудниками полиции было организовано преследование байкера. ️ В ходе погони нарушитель свернул у дома 3 по Ловизскому переулку, там броси

🤡51

30 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈2,600 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Рейды ГИБДД на Сентябрь 2026 год 🚔 🚔«Нетрезвый водитель» — 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 и 30 сентября; 🚔«Ремень безопасности» «Детское кресло» — с 1 по 11, 16, 23 и 30 сентября. 🚔«Встречная полоса» — 4, 6, 11, 13, 18, 20, 25 и 27 сентября; 🚔«Такси» — с 1 по 4, 12, 13, 26 и 27 сентября. 🚔«Мотоциклист» — 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26 и 27 сентября; 🚔«Водитель без права

👍3👌21

30 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈2,100 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

На Синопской набережной/Обуховской Обороне разлив масла На, скорости на велике улетел в ограждение + дтп

🤡72👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @doroga_47. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дорожный Контроль СПБ | ЛО” (@doroga_47), 16,789 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doroga_47.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.