4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 11:24
127
-1
15 Aug 2026, 01:44
128
-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:30
129
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:56
129
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 127 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
7 (18 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
64
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10
55.6%
🔥
5
27.8%
👍
3
16.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dop_look. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вышивка 2026: от ослика до музейного искусства 🧵
В 2026 году вышивка становится главным акцентом вещи — или маленькой деталью, заметной только вблизи.
Крупная сюжетная вышивка
Футболка Jacquemus с осликом показывает, как вышитый рисунок может заменить принт и превратить базовую вещь в fashion-объект. Носить её лучше с простыми джинсами или свободными брюками.
Микровышивка
Миниатюрные мухоморы, цветы, ягоды и символы …
Август — время open air🎧
Формула фестивального образа проста: удобная база + свободный силуэт + дополнительный слой на вечер.
Москва. PLUS+ONE SUMMER
1 августа
Для трёх сцен и десятков артистов выбираем белую футболку, прямые чёрные брюки и тёплую рубашку DOP. Днём носим расстёгнутой, вечером — вместо куртки.
Санкт-Петербург — Пикник Афиши × Сбер
8 августа
Чёрная толстовка DOP с яркой вышивкой, свободные брюки и кеды…
Как идея становится вещью 👀
Любая одежда проходит большой путь — от первого эскиза до вещи в твоём шкафу.
У DOP есть собственное производство в России, поэтому мы можем видеть весь процесс изнутри: как чертят лекала, залипательно раскраивают стопки ткани, сшивают детали и наносят вышивку на готовое изделие.
Включайте звук — сегодня вместо музыки у нас настоящий производственный ASMR: шорох ткани, ножницы и ритм машин…
Искусство вышло из рамки 🎨
Met Gala 2026 показала: образы не обязаны оставаться за стеклом. Здесь ткань стала холстом, силуэт — рамой, а вышивка, цвет и фактура заменили мазки.
- Хантер Шафер в Prada будто шагнула из «Портрета Меды Примавези» Климта.
- Грейси Абрамс в Chanel перенесла в образ золото «Портрета Адели Блох-Бауэр I».
- Эмма Чемберлен в Mugler появилась в платье, расписанном вручную.
- Энн Хэтэуэй в Micha…
Оверсайз никуда не уходит: как носить объёмные вещи
Оверсайз в 2026 году — это не просто одежда на несколько размеров больше. Главное, чтобы объём выглядел намеренно, а силуэт оставался собранным.
Хейли Бибер возвращает в моду спортивный мерч в минималистичном прочтении: молочный свитшот NYC она сочетает с прямыми джинсами. Так сувенирная вещь превращается в образ на каждый день.
Блю Айви Картер показывает: объём мож…
Летний макияж 2026: три тренда, которые хочется повторить ✨
Этим летом правило одно: меньше маски — больше цвета и естественности.
1. Живая кожа Плотный тон откладываем. Вместо него — лёгкий skin tint, консилер только там, где нужен, SPF и блеск для губ. Кожа должна выглядеть свежей, а не идеально отфильтрованной.
2. Sunburn blush 🍓 Яркий румянец наносим высоко на щёки и немного на переносицу. Получается эффект «то…
Cloud Dancer — цвет 2026. И он уже в твоём шкафу 🤍
Главный цвет года — PANTONE 11-4201 Cloud Dancer.
Чистый, воздушный белый без ухода в тепло или холод. Идеальный баланс.
После насыщенного шоколадного Mocha Mousse мир будто выдохнул.
Теперь хочется тишины, пространства и лёгкости. Cloud Dancer — про новое начало.
Почему он уже везде?
— не перетягивает внимание, но делает образ визуально дороже;
— дружит с любыми …
❤3👍2🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @dop_look. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dop Look. Модный журнал” (@dop_look), 127 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dop_look.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.