Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 中山东方会所929394交流群

Supergroup

中山东方会所929394交流群

@dongfang3366

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

2,054members

+53 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

24 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003621912269
TypeSupergroup
Username@dongfang3366
Description❤️❤️❤️东方会所(专业20年)曾为东方水疗 香山水疗 康城水疗 帝湖水疗 等服务超数十万人,值得信赖!一起分享一起交流!拒绝文字忽悠,中国人不骗中国人!每天近百人任选!服务至上92 93 94 丝足 抓龙筋 回春术💕💕💕 双向联系: @dongfangshuiliao_bot tg: @bilihappy QQ:1903995397 榜单:  @dongfang6969 出击报告: @dongfangbaogao
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 September 2026
Last confirmed live20 September 2026
Measurements held13
On Telegramt.me/dongfang3366

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9372,0541,995.512 August 2026 — 2,001 members13 August 2026 — 1,989 members17 August 2026 — 1,976 members20 August 2026 — 1,937 members24 August 2026 — 1,946 members27 August 2026 — 1,961 members30 August 2026 — 1,974 members1 September 2026 — 1,951 members5 September 2026 — 1,968 members11 September 2026 — 2,011 members14 September 2026 — 2,026 members18 September 2026 — 2,054 members20 September 2026 — 2,054 members12 August 202620 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,919–2,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
20 Sept 2026, 02:442,054no change
18 Sept 2026, 16:382,054+28
14 Sept 2026, 14:592,026+15
11 Sept 2026, 02:382,011+43
5 Sept 2026, 17:151,968+17
1 Sept 2026, 21:141,951-23
30 Aug 2026, 07:261,974+13
27 Aug 2026, 05:321,961+15
24 Aug 2026, 09:521,946+9
20 Aug 2026, 14:121,937-39
17 Aug 2026, 11:281,976-13
13 Aug 2026, 13:581,989-12
12 Aug 2026, 23:152,001first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“中山东方会所929394交流群” (@dongfang3366), 2,054 members as measured 20 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dongfang3366.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.