Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дон Карго

Channel

Дон Карго

@don_cargo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,079subscribers

+472 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003221991464
TypeChannel
Username@don_cargo
Created28 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/don_cargo

Growth

12,60713,07912,8437 August 2026 — 12,607 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,749 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,807 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,829 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,856 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,866 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,773 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,793 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,804 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,814 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,940 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,970 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,934 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,931 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,968 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,976 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,034 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,064 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,070 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,061 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,079 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net +472. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,536–13,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 08:2613,079+18
28 Aug 2026, 11:3813,061-9
27 Aug 2026, 15:0713,070+6
26 Aug 2026, 15:0813,064+30
25 Aug 2026, 13:4413,034+58
24 Aug 2026, 15:2412,976+8
23 Aug 2026, 02:2812,968+37
21 Aug 2026, 16:3912,931-3
20 Aug 2026, 13:1212,934-36
19 Aug 2026, 16:4712,970+30
18 Aug 2026, 15:3312,940+126
17 Aug 2026, 12:0512,814+10
16 Aug 2026, 04:5912,804+11
14 Aug 2026, 15:5612,793+20
13 Aug 2026, 08:5312,773-93
12 Aug 2026, 08:1612,866+10
11 Aug 2026, 10:4312,856+27
10 Aug 2026, 11:2712,829+22
9 Aug 2026, 13:0112,807+58
8 Aug 2026, 14:2712,749first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 28 October 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 13,079 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,060
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.772%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held7 (28 October 202519 August 2026)
Views total12,173
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
111100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC953 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Авто из Азии: как не потерять деньги Что машина из Китая, Кореи или Японии выходит дешевле, вы знаете и без меня. Но проблема не в этом. Разберём по порядку. Цена по телефону это не всегда финальная цена. Вам называют «под ключ 2,9». Вы соглашаетесь. Дальше вас добирают разными способами. Например.... «Таможня пересчитала». Классика. Машина уже пришла, вам звонят и просят доплатить, потому что стоимость неизвест

9

14 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC≈4,660 views21 reactionsread 19 August 2026
File

Рынок на 900 миллиардов остался без поставщиков. Медицинское оборудование из Китая. Один контейнер: 4,7 млн вложений, 11,5 млн выручки. В файле разбор всей ниши. Внутри: кто уже забирает рынок, заводы без представителя в РФ, где тут маржа и экономика контейнера Оставить заявку

21

12 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC≈6,560 views64 reactionsread 19 August 2026
File

Это самый потенциальный рынок в 2026 году. Портативные станции и накопители. Маржинальность по ценам между фабрикой и розничным рынком доходит до 2.8x (и до 5x на комплектующих). В файле подробная статья с анализом всей ниши. Внутри: Что это такое, где там деньги, пустые ниши, юнит-экономика. С сегодняшнего дня начинаем делиться полезным контентом прямо в этом канале. А совсем скоро... Бот с заявками

64

18 May 2026, 16:33 UTC≈19,500 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Как вести переговоры с китайцами? Как получить партию товара бесплатно и что написать производству? Почему качество образцов тает с каждой партией? Почему твоё NDA с заводом не работает? Как на тебе зарабатывает китайская фабрика? Как разблокировать счёт с 115-ФЗ? Как открыть торговый дом в Китае легально и на 50% дешевле рынка? И многое другое, вместе с уникальным комьюнити и чатом предпринимателей по ВЭД — в

7

8 Apr 2026, 15:47 UTC≈26,300 views4 reactionsread 19 August 2026

БОТ ДЛЯ ПРИËМА ЗАЯВОК⚡️🇨🇳 Забудьте про бесконечный поиск на авито и риск нарваться на дилетантов. Мы запускаем инструмент, который соединяет ваши задачи с реальными ресурсами команды Дона Карго. Теперь найти партнера или подрядчика по любому вопросу ВЭД и бизнеса можно в пару кликов. Как это работает: Вы заходите в наш бот и оставляете запрос на любую услугу: — Карго и Логистика (любые направления) — Сертификация

4

11 Mar 2026, 15:15 UTC≈25,400 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Кто такой Дон Карго⚡️🇨🇳 Я Дон Карго. Предприниматель, практик и человек, который вместе со своей командой ежедневно работает в сфере ВЭД. За моими плечами многолетний опыт в поставках, закупках и международной торговле. Мы с командой ежедневно курируем процессы, закрываем сложные задачи бизнеса c Китаем и другими направлениями. Этот канал моя личная база знаний и рабочий инструмент для тех, кто делает реальный биз

6

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @don_cargo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дон Карго” (@don_cargo), 13,079 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/don_cargo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.