Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DOMINATOR MMA

Channel

DOMINATOR MMA

@dominatormmaufc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,342subscribers

-178 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001662320979
TypeChannel
Username@dominatormmaufc
DescriptionПо Вопросам Сотрудничества @jeibra01 ✅ НЕ РЕКЛАМИРУЮ СТАВКИ И КАЗИНО! У нас есть отдельный чат, где можно обсуждать разные темы и найти кого-то для игры 😎 https://t.me/+h7-2pc2QmyU2NDRk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dominatormmaufc

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,3428,5248,4337 August 2026 — 8,520 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,524 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,522 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,513 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,518 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,515 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,513 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,504 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,500 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,501 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,493 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,486 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,479 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,475 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,452 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,443 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,441 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,427 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,413 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,398 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,384 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,377 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,366 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,353 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,342 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,315–8,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 00:178,342-11
1 Nov 2026, 23:368,353-13
30 Oct 2026, 07:588,366-11
27 Oct 2026, 00:388,377-7
23 Oct 2026, 18:098,384-14
20 Oct 2026, 23:068,398-15
17 Oct 2026, 13:378,413-14
14 Oct 2026, 11:398,427-14
10 Oct 2026, 13:548,441-2
4 Oct 2026, 21:218,443-9
25 Sept 2026, 04:418,452-23
17 Sept 2026, 02:018,475-4
13 Sept 2026, 05:398,479-7
9 Sept 2026, 14:218,486-7
4 Sept 2026, 14:408,493-8
1 Sept 2026, 06:488,501+1
29 Aug 2026, 14:538,500-4
26 Aug 2026, 22:348,504-9
24 Aug 2026, 05:248,513-2
20 Aug 2026, 15:358,515first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.4%
avg views ÷ 8,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held27 (30 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total28,950
Reactions total527
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
658
Videos
152
Links
146

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,063 reactions across 25 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥64631.3%
❤56927.6%
🤣47523.0%
👍2009.69%
😁221.07%
🤯221.07%
😭211.02%
🦄170.824%
👎140.679%
💩100.485%
🤮100.485%
🤡80.388%
👏70.339%
⚡60.291%
❤‍🔥60.291%
🐳50.242%
👀40.194%
💔30.145%
💘30.145%
💯30.145%
8 further kinds120.582%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (44.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,310 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Я ПРОВЕРИЛ ПРАЙМ ТОНИ ФЕРГЮСОНА В UFC 6… 🔥 https://youtu.be/noZGOeqqqJ4

❤18🔥10❤‍🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,970 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

РОЛИК ЗА ДАСТИНА УЖЕ НА КАНАЛЕ 👍 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fQ96RQfj4A

🔥32👍5🤝3❤1❤‍🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 11:24 UTC≈2,470 views44 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

НОВЫЙ РОЛИК УЖЕ НА КАНАЛЕ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7U-4OdWOeSI&t=19s

🔥39❤3🤣2

20 Oct 2026, 19:30 UTC≈5,890 views119 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Там вроде официально подтвердили, что выходить новый бокс FIGHT NIGHT CHAMPION 🤩😀🔥

🔥86❤23⚡6👀3👍1

16 Oct 2026, 16:42 UTC≈4,300 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Бои на самых высоких рейтингах в UFC 6! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_LkGM-_bQs https://www.twitch.tv/dominatormma

🔥22👍6

14 Oct 2026, 16:49 UTC≈4,340 views32 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Бои в ТОПЕ мирового РЕЙТИНГА UFC 6 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9DRUZrRCz0 https://www.twitch.tv/dominatormma

❤18🔥11👍3

14 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC≈4,030 views75 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Запущу стрим через минут 30 👀

🔥50❤11🤮7👏5👀1👍1

13 Oct 2026, 13:15 UTC≈4,640 views157 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Всех приветствую, братья мои! Ассаляму алейкум всем 🤝 Надеюсь, у всех вас всё хорошо! Я уже пару месяцев не заходил в UFC 6, немного закрутился из-за семьи, работы и других дел. Хотел бы узнать как за это время изменилась игра? Что нового добавили? Исправили ли старые проблемы? стоит ли возвращаться в октагон? 😂

❤139👎6🔥6🤡6

7 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTCviews —

DOMINATOR MMA pinned «НОВОЕ ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ В UFC 6! Новые бойцы (доступны всем) Josh Hokit (тяжёлый вес, #4, рекорд 10-0). Бывший борца-колледж и футболист. Сильные стороны: давление, борьба, контроль в партере и граунд-энд-паунд. Kyoji Horiguchi (наилегчайший вес, #5, рекорд 36…»

6 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈11,600 views80 reactionsread 5 November 2026

НОВОЕ ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ В UFC 6! Новые бойцы (доступны всем) Josh Hokit (тяжёлый вес, #4, рекорд 10-0). Бывший борца-колледж и футболист. Сильные стороны: давление, борьба, контроль в партере и граунд-энд-паунд. Kyoji Horiguchi (наилегчайший вес, #5, рекорд 36-6). Японский боец с карате-стилем. Сильные стороны: скорость, работа на дистанции, точные комбо и защита от тейкдаунов. Fight Week UFC 330 С 11 августа стартуют новы…

❤60👍17👎2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈8,680 views81 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Вышло новое обновление в UFC 6 😊

👍46🔥20🤣9❤5🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @dominatormmaufc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @dominatormmaufc as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTCAnonymous Poll954 voters

Есть тут те, кто играет в онлайн карьеру в UFC 6 ?

  1. Да, мне нравится.24%
  2. Нет, не нравится.26%
  3. Ранкед ММА.35%
  4. Ранкед СТОЙКА.25%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Captain Hardcore
@caphard · 38,122
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV
@hardcoremma · 24,472
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
VKIDKA ММА
@vkidka_champ · 23,757
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
MMA review
@topMMAreview · 28,088
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC
@dvoyechka · 26,131
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
ALL MMA | UFC
@allmma · 74,617
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DOMINATOR MMA” (@dominatormmaufc), 8,342 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dominatormmaufc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.