Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Долматова & Co

@dolmatovaanka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,450subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611838856
TypeChannel
Username@dolmatovaanka
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dolmatovaanka

Growth

4,4414,4504,445.56 August 2026 — 4,441 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,441 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,444 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,450 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,440–4,451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:584,450+6
10 Aug 2026, 03:124,444+3
7 Aug 2026, 11:164,441no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:034,441first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.6%
avg views ÷ 4,450 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,610
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held11 (20 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total7,822
Reactions total418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 05m
Average length
32m 31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,335 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
71953.9%
🔥38128.5%
❤‍🔥1229.14%
👏564.19%
🤝483.60%
😁90.674%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC882 views126 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у нас снова выпускники и я подумала, что давно не постила отзывы никакие, а они есть и вот их небольшая часть) Тренеры: Ксюша Гима, Лика Овчинникова, Алина Илехметова, Альбина Галимова. Я супервизила

64🔥37👏18❤‍🔥7

4 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,290 views136 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Про куклу В очередной раз завирусился ролик, где собаке с проблемами одиночества оставили куклу, похожую на человека. Собака остается рядом с ней (при этом продолжает выглядеть встревоженной) и ложится ей на ноги. Так как мы на постоянной основе наблюдаем большое количество собак с проблемами одиночества, а многие из них пробовали этот метод, нам есть чем поделиться. За все время мы видели только один действительно

91🔥29😁9🤝7

28 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC≈5,650 views156 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рубрика: "Что я говорила клиентам на этой неделе" В международных рекомендациях WSAVA (World Small Animal Veterinary Association) говорится следующее: «Если существует обоснованное подозрение, что животное испытывает боль, его следует считать испытывающим боль и лечить соответствующим образом, если нет противопоказаний к обезболиванию.» Этот принцип отражает современную концепцию “assume pain until proven otherwis

84🔥54🤝18

14 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC≈2,400 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

18🔥7

14 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC≈2,510 views108 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Нужно ли дрессировать собаку? Какую роль в любом тренинге играет фрустрация? Решаются ли дрессировкой поведенческие проблемы?

61🔥22❤‍🔥16👏9

6 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC≈6,680 views172 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вопрос к лекции Есть два типа «разгона пищевой мотивации». 1️⃣Первый — собаку ограничивают в еде. Логика: это сделает еду более значимой и собака начнет есть или брать еду в тренинге. Действительно, если ограничить собаку в еде, то её мозг краткосрочно увеличит направленное пищевое поведение. Это нормальная биология, когда растёт значимость ресурса, усиливается поиск этого ресурса, активизируются системы ожидания

❤‍🔥7756🔥28👏6🤝5

30 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC≈3,120 views233 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Один супер простой лайфхак в работе с проблемами одиночества. Демонстрирует Зорро! Стелим плед/лежанку у входа. Таким образом побуждаем принять решение осознанно побыть, подождать, пока собака еще на этапе контроля входной двери. Тут буквально наглядно видно как он эту мысль обдумал) Стелите лежбища собакам в тренинге у входной двери. А если они их не выбирают, пробуйте разные фактуры. Это действительно очень спос

151🔥56🤝18👏8

5 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC≈3,330 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vyshehvostPhoto

три понятные картинки о связи проблем ЖКТ и проблем с одиночеством от Ани Долматовой

53🔥21

5 Jun 2026, 16:13 UTC≈3,030 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @elizavetabumochkina

Ещё одна важная мысль с конференции от Анны Долматовой Проблемы одиночества часто воспринимаются изолированно. Как отдельная поведенческая трудность, которая живёт сама по себе и никак не связана с общим состоянием собаки. Но на практике всё сложнее. Команда Dogus поделилась статистикой: среди собак, с которыми обратились по поводу сепарационной тревоги, у 8 из 10 были проблемы с ЖКТ. А у оставшихся двух проблемы

56🔥16

5 Jun 2026, 08:48 UTC≈3,240 views156 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, коллеги, вы просили — мы сделали. Сайт команды ДОГУС готов. Вы можете отправлять ссылку владельцам собак, которые столкнулись с проблемами одиночества и вам надо отправить к нам! Обратная связь по сайту приветствуется: что добавить? Чего не хватает? Какие-то моменты остаются непонятными? https://dogus.pro

🔥8145❤‍🔥22👏8

20 May 2026, 15:03 UTC≈3,820 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У собаки нет пищевого интереса: что делать и как подкреплять желаемое поведение? Важно помнить, что снижение пищевой мотивации у собак может быть связано не только с индивидуальными особенностями, но и с болевым синдромом, тошнотой, высокой тревожностью и/или хроническим стрессом. В работе с такими пациентами важно дифференцировать: 1️⃣истинно низкую пищевую мотивацию 2️⃣отрицательную ассоциацию с пищей (на фоне,

40🔥30👏7

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dolmatovaanka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 155,888 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Долматова & Co” (@dolmatovaanka), 4,450 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dolmatovaanka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.