Channel
@doiscentavos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
149subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001302633050 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doiscentavos |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 12 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doiscentavos |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 149 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 152 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
What was the result of the experiment?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What was the diference between the two groups of students?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What was the decisive factor for the students’ score?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What could be used as a plate, a hat, or a small shovel?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What was asked of the Stanford students in the experiment?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👆🏻Li um trecho de um texto em inglês muito massa que encontrei sobre a ligação entre a mente e a caminhada. Assiste o vídeo pra responder o quiz!
Video, posted without a caption
👆🏻Um segredo pra evoluir de verdade seu inglês em 2022
Voice message, posted without a caption
Chamando todos os Red Taylor’s Version fans!! Saiu o vídeo de hoje, em que trouxemos expressões e vocabulário do inglês em All Too Well! Aqui o link pra vocês assistirem: https://youtu.be/jgFtj0gHgN0 Não esqueçam de deixar um like e se inscreverem no canal! E essa semana vai ter conteúdo exclusivo aqui no Clubinho ❤️
Clubinho, hoje eu e a Vic demos um passo muito importante pro 2centavos: publicamos nosso primeiro vídeo no YouTube! Vamos começar a postar vídeo novo todo sábado, 12h por lá :) Aqui o link pra vocês assistirem o vídeo de hoje: https://youtu.be/_AsxX83XKXU Não se esqueçam de deixar um like e se inscreverem no canal para receberem os próximos! Obrigado pelo apoio de sempre, Clubinho ❤️
Clubinho, aula 12 da #Maratona2c disponível pra vocês!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doiscentavos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What was the result of the experiment?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What was the diference between the two groups of students?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What was the decisive factor for the students’ score?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What could be used as a plate, a hat, or a small shovel?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What was asked of the Stanford students in the experiment?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Quando é que o ED tem som de T?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2021 to 14 January 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“clubinho do 2centavos” (@doiscentavos), 149 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doiscentavos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.