Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адвокат лікаря

Channel

Адвокат лікаря

@doctorslawyer

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

22,934subscribers

+685 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001419863241
TypeChannel
Username@doctorslawyer
DescriptionАвторський канал медичного адвоката Олени Бабич. Тут про: зміни законодавства, кейси із практики, подкасти, юридичні поради для лікарів. Для зв’язку @babich_law Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/elenababich YouTube: https://youtube.com/@medlawyer
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/doctorslawyer

Growth

22,24922,93422,591.57 August 2026 — 22,249 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,249 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,281 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,347 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,409 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,435 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,463 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,485 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,518 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,583 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,620 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,661 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,728 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,760 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,789 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,783 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,794 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,816 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,841 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,878 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,934 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net +685. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,146–23,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 18:3722,934+56
27 Aug 2026, 18:4422,878+37
26 Aug 2026, 20:2422,841+25
25 Aug 2026, 18:4522,816+22
24 Aug 2026, 20:5622,794+11
23 Aug 2026, 03:4522,783-6
21 Aug 2026, 15:4822,789+29
20 Aug 2026, 11:2222,760+32
19 Aug 2026, 12:4722,728+67
18 Aug 2026, 13:2922,661+41
17 Aug 2026, 10:0622,620+37
15 Aug 2026, 20:5222,583+65
14 Aug 2026, 14:0722,518+33
13 Aug 2026, 05:2422,485+22
12 Aug 2026, 01:5222,463+28
11 Aug 2026, 03:3522,435+26
10 Aug 2026, 05:4022,409+62
9 Aug 2026, 04:2122,347+66
8 Aug 2026, 02:4422,281+32
7 Aug 2026, 18:0022,249first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 22,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,630
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.959%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held31 (8 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total122,050
Reactions total1,120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
91
Videos
28
Links
456

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,414 reactions across 30 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,49361.8%
👍49320.4%
🤯1405.80%
🔥903.73%
🤬642.65%
👎512.11%
🤔481.99%
😁190.787%
😱110.456%
👏40.166%
🎄10.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 31 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doctorslawyer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC≈5,530 views86 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Пам’ятаєте критерії госпіталізації, навколо яких останні тижні було стільки галасу в соцмережах? МОЗ оперативно внесло зміни. Але лише в той пункт, де була помилка – посилання на нормативний акт, який уже не діє. Тепер цей пункт викладено в новій редакції без посилання на нечинний документ. І щось мені підказує, що інших змін до критеріїв найближчим часом ми не побачимо) При цьому проект цього Стандарту раніше був

👍6025😁1

21 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈6,380 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Друзі, це буквально кілька хвилин вашого часу, які можуть мати значення для вашого захисту завтра. Кількість спорів з пацієнтами і кримінальних проваджень у медичній сфері лише зростає. І кожен лікар, керівник або власник медичного закладу може опинитися в ситуації, коли від одного експертного висновку залежатиме дуже багато. Підписати петицію 👇 https://itd.rada.gov.ua/petitions/Petition/Index/13862

32

21 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈6,000 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

15

20 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈7,940 views121 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Це стосується кожного лікаря і керівника медичного закладу Сьогодні хочу попросити лікарів та керівників закладів не просто прочитати цей допис, а витратити кілька хвилин і підписати петицію. Тому що питання судово-медичної експертизи може здаватися дуже далеким рівно до того моменту, поки лікар сам не опиняється у кримінальному провадженні або медичний заклад в судовому спорі. У таких справах висновок судово-меди

106👍15

20 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈6,080 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Зверніть увагу на виділений абзац👆 У судових та кримінальних справах, пов’язаних із наданням медичної допомоги, ключове значення дуже часто має саме висновок судово-медичної експертизи. Просто запам’ятайте цей момент. 👇 А нижче поясню, чому це важливо і що ми з вами можемо зробити.

12🤯2

18 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈6,860 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

«Я напишу про вас у соцмережах!» Здається, сьогодні цієї фрази лікарі іноді бояться навіть більше, ніж погрози судом чи скаргою до МОЗ. У новому відео на YouTube розбираю, як діяти, якщо пацієнт погрожує негативом у соцмережах або вже опублікував допис: – коли варто реагувати; – коли краще промовчати; – як не розголосити лікарську таємницю; – і коли є підстави для юридичного захисту. 🎞ДИВИТИСЬ ВИПУСК

48👍10

18 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈6,940 views128 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ну що, законопроєкт №10221 знову згадали. Сьогодні Михайло Радуцький публічно закликав Верховну Раду якнайшвидше розглянути законопроєкт щодо посилення кримінальної відповідальності за напади на медиків. Як вважаєте, цього разу справа зрушить з місця чи знову все закінчиться публічними заявами та закликами?

102👍18🤔8

17 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈8,130 views69 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Ліцензія на медичну практику – онлайн МОЗ України повідомило про видачу першої ліцензії на медичну практику за заявою, поданою повністю в електронному форматі через новий електронний Ліцензійний реєстр МОЗ. Тобто процес отримання ліцензії тепер можна пройти онлайн – від подання заяви до прийняття рішення органом ліцензування. У разі виникнення труднощів під час подання заяви можна звернутися до служби підтримки МО

👍5013🔥5🤯1

15 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈8,620 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Заборона сурогатного материнства для іноземців 10 серпня у Верховній Раді зареєстровано одразу два пов’язані законопроєкти №15506 та №15507 щодо застосування допоміжних репродуктивних технологій методом сурогатного материнства. Які зміни пропонуються: Законопроєкт №15507 Пропонується суттєво обмежити можливість використання сурогатного материнства іноземцями. Зокрема: – застосування сурогатного материнства дозво

54👍12🤔9👎4😱1

13 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈8,500 views112 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Про напади на медиків і розголос Вчора я опублікувала в Instagram відео про черговий випадок нападу на лікаря в лікарні. Менше ніж за добу воно набрало більше 200 тисяч переглядів. Під відео я написала алгоритм, що варто розробити медзакладу для таких випадків. Але зараз я б додала до нього ще один пункт – розголос. Я завжди дуже обережно ставлюсь до винесення конфліктів між лікарями та пацієнтами в соціальні мер

84👍27🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @doctorslawyer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@doctorslawyer edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 855,495 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адвокат лікаря” (@doctorslawyer), 22,934 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctorslawyer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.