Channel
@doctorrsignals
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,134subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002041781315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doctorrsignals |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doctorrsignals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:42 | 1,134 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:07 | 1,137 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:45 | 1,137 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 April 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 April 2025 β 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 245 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
477 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 294 | 61.6% | |
| π | 67 | 14.0% | |
| π | 51 | 10.7% | |
| π | 42 | 8.81% | |
| π | 17 | 3.56% | |
| π | 6 | 1.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If you don't even know F of forex than still I will recommend join this journey with me because I will first give some guidance post before we start actual trading and challenge :
β€2
Want to Start Your Forex Journey With Me? Join the channel and letβs build this journey together. Everything will be 100% FREE, and Iβll guide you from A to Z from opening your account and understanding Forex basics to risk management, lot sizing, taking trades, and much more. I genuinely believe joining this journey could be one of the best decisions you make for your trading journey. Public Forex Challenge Startiβ¦
β€2
Follow doc copy on Blofin and earn passive income. Doc is on fire and almost recover 20% wallet in just 6 days( we were down 25% 6 day ago and now we are down only -5%) . I am planning to double wallet till September end . Make sure to join My copy ID on blofin. Because this is surprise from your beloved doc that give you Access to his private challenge without charging anything but yeah once you join all free membeβ¦
β€8
"Even though it is private challenge but to first 5 memeber I will give it free access " Eligibility Criteria is " your wallet should be above 2k$ to access it "
π2β€1
Hello! Iβm currently focused on my private copy with the goal of doubling the portfolio by the end of September. If youβd like to join the private copy, feel free to DM me here. @Liquidity_doc Exchange = blofin
β€4
We didn't get that fake candles ,and now we are going down now . We have ETH upgrade event tomorrow and that might be sell the new event.
β€14π5
" $ETH might give fake green candle this weekend or start of next week , if you got that fake candles than it is short opportunity " I will also give short call officially for now waiting for that fake green candle
π22β€12π6
" NO sleep month "
β€42π8π2π1
Count started from today
β€34π8π2π1π1
Hey community, ready for doc magic? I know youβve been missing Doctor, so Iβm starting a 20 Consecutive Winning Calls Challenge , absolutely free and publically here , I previously completed the 10- consecutive call challenge successfully, and now itβs time to raise the bar agian . Letβs see if we can complete this one too. Make sure to pin the channel so you donβt miss any updates!
β€50π7π2
$BTC "The most important Pivotal level for April monthly candle closure is " $93576 "
π9β€4π3
πLast 5 slots left before I shift my focus back to posting the public trade gain. This is the final promo β and I might not do another promo until I complete Round 2. Grab your slot here @doctortraderrr Wishing you all the best of luck
β€5π3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doctorrsignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βDπC - SπGπAπSπ¨βπ¬β (@doctorrsignals), 1,134 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctorrsignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.