Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Доктор Ольга Белоконь

@doctor_belokon

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

192,486subscribers

-202 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001248242471
TypeChannel
Username@doctor_belokon
Created9 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/doctor_belokon

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

192,486192,688192,5876 August 2026 — 192,688 subscribers6 August 2026 — 192,688 subscribers7 August 2026 — 192,667 subscribers8 August 2026 — 192,641 subscribers9 August 2026 — 192,619 subscribers10 August 2026 — 192,599 subscribers10 August 2026 — 192,555 subscribers11 August 2026 — 192,535 subscribers12 August 2026 — 192,486 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -202. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192,456–192,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:15192,486-49
11 Aug 2026, 21:58192,535-20
10 Aug 2026, 21:51192,555-44
10 Aug 2026, 01:15192,599-20
9 Aug 2026, 00:54192,619-22
8 Aug 2026, 04:08192,641-26
7 Aug 2026, 04:10192,667-21
6 Aug 2026, 15:00192,688no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:56192,688first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 September 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

107,970 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
65,49260.7%
👍17,34016.1%
🔥12,20911.3%
😱3,9753.68%
❤‍🔥1,9141.77%
🤯1,5721.46%
🙏1,2671.17%
👏1,0250.949%
🥰6340.587%
💯5900.546%
🤬5480.508%
😢4300.398%
🤔4030.373%
🤩1910.177%
👌1870.173%
😁1630.151%
🎉300.028%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107,970reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2022 to 7 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
60
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
36
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doctor_belokon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 September 2022 to 7 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Apr 2025, 15:49 UTC≈247,000 views5,818 reactions24 Starsread 12 August 2026

– Они выдёргивают относительные риски без объяснений – Искажают суть научных данных – Подрывают доверие к вакцинации, которая спасла миллионы жизней – Дискредитируют реальную эпидемиологию и статистику Наука не скрывает риски — она их изучает. Регулярно. Прозрачно. Глобально. А вот когда врачи манипулируют цифрами, пугают пациентов и толкают антивакцинаторские нарративы — это уже не ошибка. Это — системная проблем

3,920👍1,170💯341🙏109🔥64❤‍🔥58🤔47👏41

Signed Ольга

7 Apr 2025, 15:49 UTC≈244,000 views5,567 reactions36 Starsread 12 August 2026

Когда врач не умеет читать исследования и сопоставлять риски — это не просто грустно. Это опасно. Разберу «резюме», якобы «комментирующее» крупное исследование по безопасности вакцин, которое мне прислала одна из моих пациенток. На самом деле — это катастрофа. Потому что если врачи, люди с медицинским образованием, не понимают, как работает наука и статистика, то что говорить о тех, кто вне профессии? Подобные «рез

3,790👍1,030🔥336💯111🤔82❤‍🔥57👏54🤯51

Signed Ольга

7 Apr 2025, 15:49 UTC≈188,000 views3,559 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сто лет ничего не размещала здесь. Не хватает меня на все социальные сети 🥲 А делегирование по-прежнему — не мой «конёк». Но ничего, вдохнём сегодня жизнь в этот канал моей статьёй, посвящённой прививкам от COVID и тем «страшным и ужасным» резюме, гуляющим по интернету. Приятного чтения.

2,770👍428🔥219🤩48❤‍🔥40🥰32🤬12🤔5

Signed Ольга

29 Apr 2024, 11:56 UTC≈437,000 views11,065 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Возможно, в недалеком будущем, меланома (а, возможно, не только этот вид рака) может быть полностью излечима. В Лондоне проходит третья фаза исследований персонализированной мРНК-вакцины против меланомы. Вакцина нацелена на опухолевые неоантигены, которые экспрессируются раковыми клетками у каждого конкретного пациента. Это маркеры на опухоли, которые потенциально могут быть распознаны иммунной системой. Укол кодир

🔥7,8001,510👍843🙏445👏155🤯102😱78🥰57

Signed Ольга

29 Apr 2024, 11:53 UTC≈323,000 views5,173 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новости науки, которыми не могу не поделиться с вами. Жаль, что моя бабушка, которая умерла от меланомы, не дожила до этого времени. Эта новость и эта моя фотография ей бы очень понравились💔

4,070🙏454👍285🥰111🔥82❤‍🔥80😢70🤬6

Signed Ольга

17 Mar 2024, 13:35 UTC≈390,000 views3,326 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

И раз уж я тут сегодня так активна 😁 В следующее воскресенье, 24 марта , стартует мой курс «Вагиниты», где мы обсудим не только нормальную анатомию, но ещё и массу других мега актуальных тем. Это ваша реальная возможность наконец-таки разобраться со своими выделениями, уреаплазмами, лейкоцитами, жалобами, обследованиями, лечением и др. вопросами. ✔️Какими должны быть выделения в норме и что на них влияет (цикл, пи

2,220👍795🔥188👏43🥰26🤬14🤯11🤔10

Signed Ольга

17 Mar 2024, 12:35 UTC≈310,000 views749 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Думали ли вы когда-нибудь о проведении лабиопластики?

  1. Да21%
  2. Нет, никогда72%
  3. Да, в итоге сделала, результатом довольна1%
  4. Да, в итоге сделала , результатом НЕ довольна0%
  5. Да, в итоге НЕ сделала , счастлива🙂6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍477242😢14🥰7😱7🤬2

Signed Ольга

17 Mar 2024, 11:44 UTC≈299,000 views5,318 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Очень рекомендую посетить хотя бы виртуально выставку the Great Wall of vulva (это целых 400 вариантов гипсовых вульв), которая дарит знания о нормальной анатомии, освобождает от комплексов и «генитального стыда» Это не стыдно и НЕ «некрасиво» https://www.thegreatwallofvulva.com ✅Это НОРМАЛЬНО ✅Красиво ✅ЗдОрово

3,380👍1,250🔥202👏151🤯118😁49🤔45❤‍🔥38

Signed Ольга

17 Mar 2024, 11:34 UTC≈248,000 views5,887 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У моей пациентки все было красиво и ДО, и ПОСЛЕ операции. Почему тогда была проведена операция? Размер малых половых губ вызывал ФИЗИЧЕСКИЙ дискомфорт (натирание слизистой бельем, ее травматизация и раздражение, боль и дискомфорт во время занятий сексом, спортом), т.е. можно сказать были медицинские показания. Результатом операции очень довольна. Счастлив пациент = счастлив доктор 😁 ✅Прежде чем решиться на операцию

3,710👍1,420👏239🔥195🤯112😱92💯50❤‍🔥23

Signed Ольга

17 Mar 2024, 11:31 UTC≈239,000 views3,541 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Покажу вам результаты лабиопластики одной своей пациентки и чуть расскажу подробнее о том, что я думаю об этих операциях и в каком случае чаще всего делаю их делаю. Я редко делюсь подобными кейсами. По-моему,вообще впервые. Почему? Транслирование подобного не является этичным и в общем-то таких картинок не должно быть на просторах интернета от слова совсем, потому как это плохой маркетинг. НЕ существует такого понят

2,440👍793🤯108🔥61🥰41👏29🤬22😱22

Signed Ольга

10 Sept 2023, 12:20 UTC≈439,000 views5,798 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

НЕ все виды рака вульвы связаны с вирусом папилломы человека (ВПЧ), но некоторые связаны и это можно ПРЕДОТВРАТИТЬ с помощью: ✅💉 вакцинации от ВПЧ ✅здорового образа жизни (отказа от курения 🚬 в первую очередь)

😱3,730🤯908👍389370😢193🤬83🙏75🔥28

Signed Ольга Белоконь

10 Sept 2023, 12:11 UTC≈395,000 views3,345 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Конгресс ISSVD в Чикаго 🇺🇸 Невероятно устала из-за смены часовых поясов , но поездка однозначно того стоила. В следующем сообщении хочу выложить фото ВПЧ-ассоциированного РАКА ВУЛЬВЫ и напомнить вам наглядно , почему НУЖНО и ВАЖНО делать вакцинацию от ВПЧ Это может спасти вам жизнь и защитить не только от рака шейки матки, но и от других видов рака , связанных с ВПЧ. Чувствительных и слабонервных просьба НЕ смотре

2,410👍674🔥149👏47🤩22🤬21👌8😁8

Signed Ольга Белоконь

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @doctor_belokon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Mar 2024, 12:35 UTCAnonymous Poll45,000 voters approx.

Думали ли вы когда-нибудь о проведении лабиопластики?

  1. Да21%
  2. Нет, никогда72%
  3. Да, в итоге сделала, результатом довольна1%
  4. Да, в итоге сделала , результатом НЕ довольна0%
  5. Да, в итоге НЕ сделала , счастлива🙂6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2022 to 7 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,133,609 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Ольга Белоконь” (@doctor_belokon), 192,486 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctor_belokon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.