Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пластический хирург Пахомова Р.А. / Москва

Channel

Пластический хирург Пахомова Р.А. / Москва

@doc_pakhomova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,319subscribers

+1,839 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001646883897
TypeChannel
Username@doc_pakhomova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doc_pakhomova

Growth

3,4796,8045,141.56 August 2026 — 3,480 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,480 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,479 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,703 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,804 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,778 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,709 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,627 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,750 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,319 subscribers5,3196 August 20264 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net +1,839. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,980–7,303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:415,319-431
31 Aug 2026, 19:285,750-877
28 Aug 2026, 21:546,627-82
25 Aug 2026, 18:446,709-69
22 Aug 2026, 11:156,778-26
19 Aug 2026, 02:346,804+101
16 Aug 2026, 07:586,703+3,224
9 Aug 2026, 15:153,479-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:303,480no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:193,480first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.6%
avg views ÷ 5,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,160
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held15 (20 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total12,971
Reactions total1,877
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,577 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,46256.7%
👍69426.9%
🔥36514.2%
🤩220.854%
160.621%
🤔70.272%
👏60.233%
💯20.078%
🤝20.078%
😱10.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,577 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,310 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

«После операции прошло полгода. Ещё три месяца назад результат мне нравился, а сейчас форма изменилась. Это уже окончательно?» 🤔 На форумах о пластической хирургии таких вопросов много 💬 Пациенты сравнивают фотографии, замечают разницу между сторонами и пытаются понять, почему внешний вид меняется спустя несколько месяцев после операции. Я понимаю, почему это вызывает беспокойство. Синяки давно прошли, выраженного

2👍1

15 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈2,470 views470 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

253👍143🔥74

13 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC≈3,770 views805 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

💬 «Прошло несколько месяцев после абдоминопластики, а кожа над швом всё ещё как будто чужая. Чувствительность вернётся?» Так пациентки описывают свои ощущения на форумах, и тот же вопрос я часто слышу на приёме. Внешне всё уже заживает, а онемение сохраняется — конечно, это тревожит.🙈 Во время абдоминопластики часть мелких чувствительных нервов попадает в зону вмешательства. Они восстанавливаются медленно, поэтому

408👍239🔥155👏2💯1

11 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,680 views395 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

205👍102🔥88

9 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,910 views204 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Согласно исследованию 2024 года, почти 75% опрошенных искали информацию о пластической хирургии в интернете на разных этапах подготовки. Это вполне понятно. Перед операцией хочется разобраться в теме, снизить тревогу, почувствовать больше контроля над ситуацией. Но у такой подготовки есть обратная сторона. 👇 После десятков фотографий «до и после», историй пациенток, разборов операций может появиться ощущение, что

140🔥33👍31

9 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC831 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Хочу задать вам вопрос: как вы готовитесь к пластической операции?

  1. Читаю форумы14%
  2. Сохраняю кейсы43%
  3. Смотрю видео врачей29%
  4. Прихожу на консультацию с мыслью «Сначала хочу услышать мнение специалиста»71%
  5. Свой вариант в комментариях0%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC765 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Кто-то делает оттопыренные уши частью своего образа, а кто-то с детства старается их скрыть. Такая особенность встречается примерно у 5% людей — то есть у каждого двадцатого. Одни совершенно спокойно относятся к своей внешности, не задумываются о коррекции. Более того, для некоторых эта черта становится частью узнаваемого образа. 😢 Но бывает иначе. Насмешки в детстве, обидные прозвища, нежелание собирать волосы ил

2👍2🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC804 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

«После блефаропластики глаза стали круглыми. Это ещё отёк?» Такие жалобы действительно можно встретить на форумах. Сразу скажу: так быть не должно. В первые недели форма глаз действительно может выглядеть непривычно. Но если прошёл месяц, а разрез остался другим и такого результата вы с хирургом не обсуждали, то это повод снова обратиться к врачу 🙈 До операции важно проговорить, какую форму глаз мы сохраняем и ка

👍31💯1

30 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC≈3,360 views449 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

329👍94🤩22🤔3😱1

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,390 views170 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

100👍589🤔3

28 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC170 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

«Хочу именно глубокую подтяжку лица. Говорят, она самая эффективная». А на форумах можно встретить и другой совет: «Лучше максимальный комплекс». После таких обсуждений можно решить, что у подтяжек есть собственный рейтинг: эндоскопическая считается более лёгкой, SMAS — более серьёзной, а глубокая — самой эффективной.😅 ❎ Но выбирать операцию по принципу «чем больше объём, тем лучше результат» точно не стоит. У ка

👍1794🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC137 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«На ощупь будет как своя. Муж даже не заметит». Звучит успокаивающе. И у некоторых пациенток действительно почти нет разницы в ощущениях. Но обещать это каждой женщине ещё до осмотра я бы не стала. Во время консультации важно обсуждать не только размер и форму будущей груди. Пациентку волнует, будет ли прощупываться имплант, как изменится чувствительность, не станет ли грудь казаться чужой или холодной. И это совер

3👍2🔥21

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @doc_pakhomova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Хочу задать вам вопрос: как вы готовитесь к пластической операции?

  1. Читаю форумы14%
  2. Сохраняю кейсы43%
  3. Смотрю видео врачей29%
  4. Прихожу на консультацию с мыслью «Сначала хочу услышать мнение специалиста»71%
  5. Свой вариант в комментариях0%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пластический хирург Пахомова Р.А. / Москва” (@doc_pakhomova), 5,319 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_pakhomova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.