🇰🇭 8月17日凌晨,柬埔寨金边市丹哥区PZ监狱内发生越狱未遂事件 一群中国籍公民试图越狱,并与狱警发生枪战,现场一度陷入混乱。 据称,期间还有100多名其他囚犯试图趁乱逃离监狱,但最终均未能成功,随后被狱警控制并抓回。 目前,事件的具体起因、人员伤亡情况以及现场处置情况仍有待进一步确认。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
👍2👏2🔥2🤬1😁1😱1

Channel
@dnyqys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40,735subscribers
-3,917 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003937458615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnyqys |
| Description | 白天小编: @guo9166 夜间小编: @pdx1916 广告合作联系 @bbc886 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnyqys |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 40,735 | -960 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 41,695 | -1,554 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 43,249 | -84 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 43,333 | -281 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 43,614 | -363 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 43,977 | -298 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 44,275 | -275 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 44,550 | -102 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 44,652 | first reading |
48 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 270,880 |
| Reactions total | 1,209 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,209 reactions across 48 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 282 | 23.3% | |
| ❤ | 235 | 19.4% | |
| 🤬 | 98 | 8.11% | |
| 👍 | 78 | 6.45% | |
| 👏 | 55 | 4.55% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 4.22% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 3.97% | |
| 💩 | 42 | 3.47% | |
| 😱 | 39 | 3.23% | |
| 🤡 | 33 | 2.73% | |
| 🌚 | 29 | 2.40% | |
| 🥴 | 29 | 2.40% | |
| 🤮 | 25 | 2.07% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 2.07% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 1.90% | |
| 🖕 | 18 | 1.49% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 1.16% | |
| 🍌 | 13 | 1.08% | |
| 😡 | 12 | 0.993% | |
| 🎉 | 10 | 0.827% | |
| 16 further kinds | 50 | 4.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇰🇭 8月17日凌晨,柬埔寨金边市丹哥区PZ监狱内发生越狱未遂事件 一群中国籍公民试图越狱,并与狱警发生枪战,现场一度陷入混乱。 据称,期间还有100多名其他囚犯试图趁乱逃离监狱,但最终均未能成功,随后被狱警控制并抓回。 目前,事件的具体起因、人员伤亡情况以及现场处置情况仍有待进一步确认。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
👍2👏2🔥2🤬1😁1😱1
#网友投稿 #四特区小勐拉 这是谁家的宝贝呀?再急也不能下车就拉啊,都不看一下旁边有没有摄像头!现在都被人家看完了😂😂 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
🤣18👏2🔥1🥰1🥴1😱1
海鲜味太浓 散散味 ! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
😁6❤2👏2👍1🔥1🥴1
#网友 吐槽 在金边移民局,本来以为关在一起的是个女的,结果后来才发现是个人妖,胸做了,下面没做,确实太炸裂了。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
🤣15😁9🌚6❤4🤮4👍1
#网友爆料 致敬!为东南亚外出打工的人员感到不值。 图上聊天内容为热心网友提供 受害者男主:福建泉州安溪县感德镇霞村人 #汪鹏南 女主:福建省泉州市安溪县剑斗镇人士(吴碧英) 国内目前居住:福建泉州安溪县参内镇隆恩华城6号楼。 前几天跟一个比较爱装的朋友喝酒,两杯啤酒下肚,讲诉了他的偷家故事,下面把三号主人公名为“蔡总”! 故事发生于2022年底。蔡总于一场朋友邀请聚会上认识吴碧英,恰逢汪鹏南(汪总)偷渡出国至柬埔寨中国城凯博一期做国内精聊诈骗。 汪总本在国内已经六合彩、打麻将,欠了不少钱,也是无力偿还。本想自己偷渡出去,能摇身一变成为新一代“诈总”,奈何生不逢时、天生缺陷、能力很差,无法成为自己理想型的男人。 吴碧英女士经朋友介绍,一起去吃大排档喝酒的时候,偶然跟蔡总认识。一看蔡总一表人才,再怎么不济也比她现在的老公汪鹏南高出半个头。想想她那死鬼老公1米58的身高,于是假装喝了4杯啤酒下肚就晕了,让蔡总叫代驾一起送她…
❤12👏7😁3🍌2🔥2🤮2🙈2🥴1
#网友投稿 不知这个小孩子犯了什么错 什么原因打的 打的怎么狠 怎么会有狠毒的女人 看得我牙痒痒的 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
🤬30😱7💩5🌚3❤2⚡1👍1🔥1
这是谁的部下,对着马路上的美女打飞机 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
🤣38❤2❤🔥2👏2🔥2👍1🥴1
#紧急求助 中国公民在马来西亚槟城遭遇黑社会团伙两次暴力打砸抢,厨师重伤昏迷! 我是马来西亚的一名中国餐饮创业者。近期,我们的店铺连续两次遭到当地“槟城24K东田”黑社会性质团伙的恶性打砸抢: 第一次(7月31日 21:45):数十人闯入店铺打砸抢并殴打员工致伤。我们当时选择隐忍未报警,却换来对方更加嚣张的变本加厉。 第二次(8月11日 19:00):该团伙40余人再次公然闯入,疯狂破坏监控图谋毁灭证据,并实施极度残暴的殴打。我店主厨被打成重伤,至今仍在医院抢救室昏迷不醒,多名员工住院治疗。 目前我们手中已留存大量完整证据,并已向中国驻马来西亚使领馆寻求领事保护,同时敦促马来西亚警方高度重视、彻查此黑社会性质团伙,将凶手绳之以法! 恳请各位中国同胞与媒体朋友帮忙转发扩散! 我们本本分分异国创业,只求一个人身安全与公道,绝不向恶势力低头!天网恢恢,疏而不漏! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大
❤5😁3
#分享 给各位大屌看看 我和我的异国他乡的女朋友日常。😃😃😃 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
🖕9❤8👍5🍌3😱3😍2🌭1💩1
#吃瓜 郑州工商学院 王涵 表面清纯女神 私下被金主狂顶 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
👍7😍6❤5👏3🌚2🔥2
#网友投稿 🇲🇲果敢老街“酒号酒店”,看下是谁的女朋友已经被别人放进去了,窗帘也不拉。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
🤣30❤7👍1🥴1
#网友爆料 今晚,柴桢省斯瓦伊杰伦县特莫萨村发生一起命案。 一对夫妻发生冲突后,丈夫持刀砍向妻子,导致女子颈部受伤并当场死亡。目前,两人发生冲突的具体原因还不清楚。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存送19999U 反水5.0% 信誉大盘 实力保证!
❤5🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @dnyqys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 199,892 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚清一色” (@dnyqys), 40,735 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnyqys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.