Channel
@dny500
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,539subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002403483255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dny500 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dny500 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 3,539 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 3,555 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (9 June 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 10 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#世界杯：战报：西班牙1-0击败阿根廷夺得世界杯冠军 新王登基书写足球历史 北京时间7月20日凌晨，2026年世界杯迎来最终决战，西班牙队与阿根廷队在决赛舞台展开巅峰对决。经过90分钟激烈较量，西班牙凭借关键进球，以1比0战胜阿根廷，成功捧起世界杯冠军奖杯。 比赛开场后，双方迅速进入状态。阿根廷队凭借丰富的大赛经验，通过中场组织和个人能力不断寻找进攻机会；西班牙队则延续传统传控风格，利用快速传递和整体配合制造威胁。 上半场比赛节奏紧张，双方在攻防两端展开激烈争夺。两队防线保持高度集中，多次化解对方进攻，比分始终未能被改写。 易边再战后，比赛进入最关键阶段。西班牙逐渐加强进攻节奏，并在一次进攻机会中抓住机会完成破门，取得领先。落后的阿根廷随后展开猛烈反扑，多次尝试扳平比分，但西班牙防守体系稳固，最终守住胜果。 随着终场哨响，西班牙以1比0击败阿根廷，历史上再次登上世界杯最高领奖台，成为本届赛事最大赢家。 对于阿根廷而言…
🏆 美加墨世界杯 2026 | I组 🏆 比赛结束 🏆 🎺 法国 4 : 6 英格兰 🏃 半场 0 : 4 🎉 英格兰 获胜!
世界杯 | 梅西激动落泪，埃及主帅：有黑幕！直接判阿根廷晋级算了！ 比赛尾声13分钟内连扳3球，阿根廷又为世界杯留下一场经典比赛，3比2逆转绝杀埃及，晋级8强。 贡献1球1助攻的梅西赛后激动落泪，他在接受采访时说道：“我们再次绝处逢生。我们感到如释重负。0比2落后扳回来不容易，但这个集体永不放弃，永远战斗到最后。我们很走运进了球，逆转了比赛。能在淘汰赛打出这种比赛，太疯狂了。” 绝杀功臣恩佐表示：“百感交集。这个集体表现出了勇气。看看梅西，他是我们最伟大的榜样，他永不放弃，永远向前。逆境中，他总是向我们展示，我们可以做到。如果今天就回家，那太早了。我们会战斗到最后。” 赛后第一时间场边接受采访时，斯卡洛尼激动到几乎说不出话来：“我没法抬起头，对不起，我现在太激动了。多么了不起的一群球员啊，兄弟。就这样吧，我得走了。” 稍后来到新闻发布厅，斯卡洛尼表示：“足球关乎于战术和策略，但也关乎于心与本能。战术很重要，但如果没有我…
世界杯 | 法国1比0战胜巴拉圭，姆巴佩点射，法国1/4决赛对阵摩洛哥 当地时间7月4日，在费城体育场进行的世界杯1/8决赛中，法国队1比0战胜巴拉圭队。法国队晋级后，将在8强战对阵摩洛哥队。
英格兰半场0-1落后民主刚果！西宾加闪击建功 北京时间7月2日0点，世界杯1/16决赛，英格兰在梅赛德斯体育场对阵民主刚果正在进行中。小组赛阶段，英格兰2胜1平以L组第1晋级；民主刚果1胜1平1负，以K组第3晋级。本场比赛的获胜方，将在1/8决赛中对阵墨西哥。 上半场，西宾加破门打穿近角，维萨中柱，英格兰多次错过进球良机。半场战罢，英格兰0-1暂时落后民主刚果。
世界杯 | 日本5进淘汰赛0胜，森保一：怪我水平不够 世界杯前2场淘汰赛，连续出现绝杀。加拿大第92分钟击倒南非，巴西第95分钟送日本回家。马丁内利第95分00秒的绝杀，是1966年有相关统计以来，世界杯淘汰赛常规时间的最晚致胜球。巴西如此极致的取胜方式，更加令日本伤痛欲绝。后场丢球导致被绝杀的田中碧终场哨响后倒地不起，球衣捂脸，深陷自责。
世界杯第18日！首支16强球队诞生，东道主加拿大92分钟绝杀南非！韩国主帅引咎辞职，莱万将投美职联
世界杯第17日！英格兰头名晋级，凯恩独享队史射手王！克罗地亚、加纳双双出线，伊朗排名再降一位 世界杯 英格兰2-0巴拿马 英格兰2-0巴拿马，头名晋级！贝林厄姆传射，凯恩破门独享队史射手王 北京时间6月28日凌晨5点，世界杯小组赛L组第三轮，巴拿马在大都会人寿体育场对阵英格兰。最终英格兰2-0巴拿马。上半场，拉什福德完成多次有威胁的攻门。半场战罢，两队暂时战平。下半场，英格兰利用角球进攻由贝林厄姆打破僵局，随后贝林厄姆传中助攻凯恩头球扩大比分。凯恩超越莱因克尔，独享英格兰队史世界杯射手王。全场战罢，英格兰2-0巴拿马。
世界杯｜塞内加尔5-0十人伊拉克列第三，顺位超韩国！迪亚拉闪击，盖耶梅开二度 北京时间6月27日凌晨3点，世界杯小组赛I组第三轮，塞内加尔在多伦多BMO球场对阵伊拉克。最终塞内加尔5-0伊拉克，塞内加尔凭借净胜球优势，在“成绩最好小组第三”的争夺中已经超越韩国队。
世界杯E组大结局：三队晋级！厄瓜多尔逆袭德国，科特迪瓦队史首次突围 6月26日，2026美加墨世界杯小组赛E组的比赛已经全部结束。最终德国2胜1负积6分排名小组第一；科特迪瓦2胜1负，因相互战绩劣势屈居第二；厄瓜多尔1胜1平1负积4分排名第三；库拉索1平2负积1分排名垫底。 1/16决赛，E组头名德国队，会对阵A组、B组、C组、D组或F组第三中的一支；E组次名的科特迪瓦，则将会对阵I组次名。 而E组第三的厄瓜多尔，则凭借4分0净胜球的成绩，超越已经小组出线的波黑，升至“成绩最好的小组第三”排行榜第一位，同样锁定一个32强席位，他们的潜在对手，将是A组、B组、D组、G组、K组或L组头名。
观察 | 维尼修斯状态爆棚，内马尔时隔981天回归，巴西向第6颗星稳步前进！ 北京时间今天（25日）早上，2026国际足联美加墨世界杯C组第3轮，巴西3比0大胜苏格兰。此役过后，桑巴军团以2胜1平积7分锁定小组头名。除了获胜和晋级淘汰赛阶段，巴西队迎来了内马尔的回归，后者时隔981天再次为桑巴军团出战！
❤1
世界杯｜英格兰0-0加纳，无缘提前出线！凯恩失绝杀，马宁出任第四官员
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dny500. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,007,985 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚日报/足球/体育/世界杯” (@dny500), 3,539 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dny500.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.