7 measurements spanning 7 days, net +261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,020–14,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 13:03
14,320
+56
16 Aug 2026, 03:18
14,264
+39
14 Aug 2026, 11:47
14,225
+32
13 Aug 2026, 03:24
14,193
+32
12 Aug 2026, 00:32
14,161
+85
10 Aug 2026, 22:06
14,076
+17
10 Aug 2026, 16:30
14,059
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
63.1%
avg views ÷ 14,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,030
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
11 (1 December 2025 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
9,030
Reactions total
99
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
1
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
504 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
300
59.5%
👍
146
29.0%
👏
32
6.35%
🔥
11
2.18%
🥰
7
1.39%
👀
6
1.19%
👎
2
0.397%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 504reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
尊敬的 DNSHE域名用户:
为持续提升平台的稳定性、安全性与使用体验,DNSHE 近期完成了多项系统升级与功能优化。同时,我们对免费域名注册规则、额度体系及奖励机制进行了调整。
现将本次更新内容公告如下:
🎨 界面与体验全面升级
全新页面设计:我们对平台前端界面进行了全面优化,整体视觉风格更加统一,交互逻辑更加清晰,操作体验更加流畅,为用户带来更直观、高效的管理体验。
DNS 与 API 性能优化:
本次升级重新梳理了 DNS 解析记录管理逻辑,并优化了后台处理流程。同时对 API 架构进行了深度重构,有效降低请求延迟,进一步提升高并发场景下的稳定性与响应速度。
🗑 自助删除域名功能优化(灰度开放):
为进一步提升域名管理体验,平台已灰度开放自助删除域名功能优化。
调整后,即使域名曾存在 DNS 解析记录历史,在满足删除条件的情况下,用户仍可直接自助删除域名。该功能目前正分批开放中,我们将持续观察运行情况,并逐步向所有用户开放…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dnshecom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 499,395 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DNSHE” (@dnshecom), 14,320 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnshecom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.