Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДневникКоуча

Channel

ДневникКоуча

@dnevnikkoycha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

403subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001885265420
TypeChannel
Username@dnevnikkoycha
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 November 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dnevnikkoycha

Growth

4038 Nov 2026, 14:48 — 403 subscribers8 Nov 2026, 15:22 — 403 subscribers8 Nov 2026, 14:488 Nov 2026, 15:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 402–404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 15:22403no change
8 Nov 2026, 14:48403first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 403 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held12 (16 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total368
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
648
Videos
192
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11255.2%
🔥3115.3%
❤‍🔥167.88%
👏125.91%
🫡104.93%
💯62.96%
🦄62.96%
💘31.48%
👍20.985%
😁20.985%
🤓10.493%
🤣10.493%
🥰10.493%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC67 viewsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Что мешает вам начать важное прямо сейчас, а не «потом»?

  1. Боюсь, что не получится18%
  2. Жду, когда появятся силы и мотивация50%
  3. Чувствую, что еще не готов (-а)18%
  4. Правда нет времени или денег36%
  5. Сначала хочу все спланировать и подготовиться27%
  6. Не до конца понимаю, чего хочу27%
  7. Ничего не мешает, просто не задумывался(-лась)9%

The shares total 185%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC73 viewsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Обычно идеи, которые мы откладываем, мы начинаем с фразы «вот когда…., тогда….». А какое «вот когда…» есть у вас?

  1. Вот похудею, и тогда…43%
  2. Вот закончу ремонт/перееду, и тогда…19%
  3. Вот дети подрастут, и тогда…19%
  4. Вот закрою ипотеку/накоплю, и тогда…24%
  5. Вот найду нормальную работу, и тогда….19%
  6. Вот сдам отчет/проект/сессию, и тогда…38%
  7. Вот появится время, и тогда…38%
  8. Вот выйду на пенсию, и тогда…5%
  9. У меня нет таких мыслей14%

The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC78 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Вчера в очередной раз поймала себя на мысли: «Вот сдам все статьи, тогда и выдохну»… Но если честно, говорю это примерно с того момента, как начала заниматься наукой… а «выдохну» все никак не наступит 🤣🤭 У психологов для этого есть отдельное понятие: синдром отложенной жизни [если быть точнее сценарий..] Когда настоящая жизнь как будто начнется потом. После ремонта, ипотеки, нового места работы. 11 ноября (уже в бл…

🫡2❤1👍1

29 Oct 2026, 10:14 UTC150 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Перечитываю внезапно свои посты за прошлый год) и понимаю как же люблю этот канал) и как здорово выгружать в него свои мысли о происходящих событиях в моменте. Ведь я его действительно задумывала как Дневник) так и продолжим)))

❤15🔥1

8 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC283 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Наконец-то могу с уверенностью сказать- в новый учебный год втянулась, расписание прояснилось! И очень соскучилась по коучингу и работе с группами. Стартуем в новый сезон, запускаем новое голосование по темам) Делимся с теми коллегами, кто находится в профессиональном тупике и не знает, как и куда дальше🎓 Все подробности в группе: https://t.me/+1H-zEYG0zZo5MmYy

🫡4

13 Sept 2026, 18:51 UTC329 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Мне очень нравится идея живого общения с аудиторией) и поэтому хочу начать новую рубрику- ответы на ваши вопросы. Вопросы можно писать в комментариях под видео или в сообщениях каналу) А первая порция ответов уже в видео😉👩🏻‍🎓

❤‍🔥11💯2👏1🔥1🫡1

3 Sept 2026, 18:28 UTC346 views32 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Девятнадцатый год подряд (сама в шоке от цифры) захожу в аудиторию в начале сентября. И все равно волнуюсь перед первой парой) В двадцать два это было «а вдруг они поймут, что я младше некоторых из них», «а вдруг они взрослые и знают больше меня»😅.. Сейчас по-другому — просто интересно, какие они, эти новые тридцать человек. Но волнение все равно есть, ведь мне надо одновременно произвести приятное впечатление сра…

❤22💯4👏2🔥2👍1🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC383 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥5❤3🫡1

2 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC362 views44 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Всем привет! Все чаще думаю о возвращении в ТГ (пока Инст* прям затянул). И все время думаю- а есть ли здесь сейчас аудитория. Давайте устроим перекличку? Кто по-прежнему тут и планирует остаться, ставьте любые реакции на это сообщение)

❤32👏5💘3🦄2🤓1🫡1

22 Jun 2026, 20:56 UTC461 views48 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

40 лет🩷 Возраст, который меня не пугает, если что. Конечно же это звучит как рубеж, как новый этап. И это этап, когда я точно знаю: ➡️чего я хочу (даже wishlist подарков впервые составила😅🫣) ➡️чего я не хочу ➡️какой я хочу быть ➡️что мне идет, а что нет ➡️с кем я хочу проводить время ➡️и когда мне хочется побыть одной. Я точно знаю, что я профессионал и знаю, куда я иду. Спасибо моим близким и любимым, за то, что я …

🔥24❤13🦄4👏3😁2🤣1🫡1

16 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC362 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

А это ежегодная классика, прям традиция 🔥🤣🤣🤣

❤12🔥3

16 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC329 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Рабочие будни сейчас 💥 Делюсь кусочками своих дней) Как сегодня мне сказали в разговоре:.. вы могли бы перечислить ВСЕ виды вашей деятельности, а то я не успеваю следить) Что тут сказать) я сама иногда за собой не успеваю следить🤭😅 Предзащиты аспирантов, в том числе моих. Соответственно подготовка 🌪️Тезисы на главную конференцию года. Ну и зачеты, экзамены)))

❤14👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dnevnikkoycha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Что мешает вам начать важное прямо сейчас, а не «потом»?

  1. Боюсь, что не получится18%
  2. Жду, когда появятся силы и мотивация50%
  3. Чувствую, что еще не готов (-а)18%
  4. Правда нет времени или денег36%
  5. Сначала хочу все спланировать и подготовиться27%
  6. Не до конца понимаю, чего хочу27%
  7. Ничего не мешает, просто не задумывался(-лась)9%

The shares total 185%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Обычно идеи, которые мы откладываем, мы начинаем с фразы «вот когда…., тогда….». А какое «вот когда…» есть у вас?

  1. Вот похудею, и тогда…43%
  2. Вот закончу ремонт/перееду, и тогда…19%
  3. Вот дети подрастут, и тогда…19%
  4. Вот закрою ипотеку/накоплю, и тогда…24%
  5. Вот найду нормальную работу, и тогда….19%
  6. Вот сдам отчет/проект/сессию, и тогда…38%
  7. Вот появится время, и тогда…38%
  8. Вот выйду на пенсию, и тогда…5%
  9. У меня нет таких мыслей14%

The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДневникКоуча” (@dnevnikkoycha), 403 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevnikkoycha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.