Channel
@dmitriychernyak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
89subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001434436345 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dmitriychernyak |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dmitriychernyak |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 89 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 91 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 92 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 93 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 93 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2024 to 27 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пару месяцев назад писал про самые актуальные «тапалки» так называемые мини апы , тренд уже давно угас. Дорабатываем те что имеем. Завтра ТГЕ Paws 🐾 3 марта Ардроп от iceberg О результатах сообщу сразу
👍1
Чекер дропа на orbiter, клейм и листинг завтра https://orbiter.finance/en/airdrop
🔥1
Пока последовательность не нарушается, следующий к атх ETh?
Не забываем заходить в PAWS 🐾 Если кто еще не здесь, дроп обещают уже к НГ Действий минимум : переходим по ссылке На этом все, по желанию выполняем задания, приложение автоматически насчитает , количество поинтов Кстати Blum прямой партнер
❤1
Если вникнуть в основную массу крипто чатов , все по прежнему активно занимаются мемами, в основном на бейзе, Про инструменты торговли писал выше а вы торгуете щитками ?
Получил дроп от wallet connect Проверить можно по ссылке https://airdrop.walletconnect.network Если вы не получили, расстраиваться не стоит токены непередаваемые, можно только застейкать
Мемы отодвигают в сторону технологии со стороны интереса крипто сообщества, и развивают фомо у большинства людей; Если вы держите фундаментальные монеты, то не поддавайтесь соблазну продать условный optimism и искать счастье в щитках; Побеждает тот кто умеет ждать
🔥1
Биткоин вот вот покажет исторический максимум Еще немного и 100к$ 🤯
👍1
Всех ждущих дроп от Elixir, хорошие новости ) Уже много раз о нем писал. Заключили партнерство с Securitize После месяцев разработки и более 1 млрд долларов вложений, эта программа позволяет Blackrock BUIDL и другим держателям RWA беспрепятственно получать доступ к DeFi Намекают на большие инвестиции в проект. Introducing Elixir’s “deUSD RWA Institutional Program” - a first ever partnership with Securitize Afte…
❤2
Торговля Мемкоинами Лудомания или способ сделать хороший профит ? Если бы сейчас у меня спросили, где сейчас есть самые большие иксы , я бы сказал в щитках. Мемкоины на бэйзе стреляют от 5 х до 100 х, причем рост происходит за секунды По сути никакие графики здесь не работают , и фундаментальный анализ ничего не решает Решает все заход на маленькой капе и хайп самого мемкоина Какие-то странные критерии успешног…
Биткоин 88к$ Очень мощно Свидетели исторического события Логично ждать скоро памп альты , которая никак не может выбраться с низов )
Не знаю почему, но большинство скипнули этот проект, а до дропа чуть больше месяца осталось Я писал о нем еще летом но в августе продлил сезон фарма Дроп 15 декабря Это идеальный вариант для тех кто держит эфир (рост эфира + бонус в виде дропа) А в сундуке кстати оказался буст на x2 от нафармленных поинтов
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dmitriychernyak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dmitriychernyak named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дмитрий Черняк | Крипта 24👨💻💰” (@dmitriychernyak), 89 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmitriychernyak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.