Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фантастика с Дмитрием Злотницким

Channel

Фантастика с Дмитрием Злотницким

@dmitrii_sff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,413subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001696470264
TypeChannel
Username@dmitrii_sff
Created7 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dmitrii_sff

Growth

4,4134,4384,425.57 August 2026 — 4,438 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,433 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,427 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,421 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,413 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,409–4,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:394,413-8
13 Aug 2026, 07:184,421-6
10 Aug 2026, 16:014,427-6
8 Aug 2026, 02:334,433-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:464,438first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.5%
avg views ÷ 4,413 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,320
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held12 (8 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total6,950
Reactions total321
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

917 reactions across 12 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22224.2%
👍20822.7%
🔥17519.1%
❤‍🔥9310.1%
9210.0%
😭606.54%
👌141.53%
💯101.09%
😐50.545%
👀40.436%
👎30.327%
😎30.327%
😢30.327%
😁20.218%
😈20.218%
🙈20.218%
🤝20.218%
🤣20.218%
🤷‍♂20.218%
🎃10.109%
12 further kinds121.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 917reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,530 views114 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ровно тридцать лет назад на английском вышла «Игра престолов» — книга, без которой невозможно представить себе современное фэнтези. До сих пор помню, какое огромное впечатление она произвела на меня при первом прочтении, и возвращаясь к ней я каждый раз получал массу удовольствия.

67🔥33👍12👎1🦄1

28 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC≈2,420 views96 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Двадцать лет назад за своим рабочим столом ушел из жизни мастер героического фэнтези Дэвид Геммел. В это время он трудился над рукописью финального тома трилогии «Троя», который в итоге был дописан его вдовой и вышел спустя год после смерти писателя. Из-под его пера Геммела много отличных романов и циклов, но для меня любимым стала именно «Троя». На мой взгляд, это великолепное переосмысление гомеровского эпоса в реа

64👍29😎2😈1

22 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC≈3,000 views111 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, со времен «Наполеона» меня так не разочаровывало кино. «Одиссея» произвела на меня крайне удручающее впечатление. Претензий у меня к фильму множество, но пожалуй главная в том, что от Одиссея, как персонажа, тут просто ничего не осталось. Все качества, определяющие персонажа, отсутствуют. Ни целеустремленности, ни хитрости, ни обаяния, ни гордости, ни даже стремления попасть домой.

😭60🔥17💯10👍9😐5👀42❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC≈4,270 views93 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скотт Линч порадует своих поклонников сразу двумя релизами уже 28 июля. Рассказом о расследовании убийства, произошедшем на собрании волшебников, и расширенной версией повести о кайдзю, посланном на Землю, чтобы побудить человечество свернуть с гибельного пути, по которому оно идет. Увы, это не долгожданный «Шип Эмберлейна», но все-таки радует, что Линч снова более-менее регулярно публикуется.

6425👎1🤡1🤨1🤯1

9 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC≈3,410 views83 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Свежий роман Джо Хилла — один из лучших, что я читал в этом году — выходит на русском уже очень скоро, причем сразу в двух оформлениях. Оба, по-моему, хороши, но второй вариант с черным фоном мне пожалуй нравится больше.

❤‍🔥46🔥239👍3🎃1🤝1

4 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC≈3,630 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A Trade of Blood третий роман цикла об эксцентричной и на редкость прозорливой следовательнице Ане Долабре и ее помощнике Диниосе Коле, который выступает рассказчиком. Во всех своих циклах Роберт Джексон Беннетт проявляет себя, как отличный демиург, из-под пера которого выходят самобытные фэнтезийные миры. В Shadow of the Leviathan Беннет использует особенности, придуманного им мира, чтобы создавать оригинальные и ин

👍38174🔥2🤔1😈1😍1

3 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC≈3,110 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У грядущего романа Джо Аберкромби The Heretics, выходящего следующей весной и продолжающего«Дьволов», появилась аннотация: У опозоренной инквизиторши, матери Беккерт, есть лишь один шанс на искупление. Она должна выкорчевать ересь в гибнущем городе Цайце, даже если для этого ей придется использовать помощь еретиков. Болезненно амбициозный Хьюго фон Котц занимает шестое место в очереди наследников главы города, и нача

🔥401111👍2😁2🤝1🤣1😴1

23 Jun 2026, 05:53 UTC≈3,800 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Небольшое забавное видео с Аберкромби и Сандерсоном, из которого можно узнать, например, что Брендон будет делать в случае зомби-апокалипсиса, кто из них не читал «Войну и мир» или какие кинопроекты заставляли Джо плакать. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ny9c03KioY

❤‍🔥30🔥135🤣1😢1🙏1

22 Jun 2026, 19:46 UTC≈2,940 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Приступаю к чтению одно из самых ожидаемых для меня книг года – новинки Тэда Уильямса.

👍34🔥17👌113😢2🥱1😎1😨1

22 Jun 2026, 14:23 UTC≈2,960 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всегда особенно приятно писать об авторах, которыми зачитывался в детстве. К сегодняшнему юбилею Хаггарда подготовил небольшую статью о его жизни и книгах. https://www.chitai-gorod.ru/articles/interesnye-fakty-o-genri-rajdere-haggarde

24🔥15👍4👌3🏆1

11 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC≈3,840 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Удивительное дело, в Disclosure Day вроде бы очень много моментов, которые должны вызывать реакцию «не верю». Но настолько хороши постановка, актерская игра и музыка, что по итогу выходишь из кинозала с ощущением, что это были два с половиной часа ярких эмоций и чистого удовольствия. Определенно, уровень топовых работ Спилберга.

👍46🔥154🙈2🤷‍♂1

8 Jun 2026, 09:03 UTC≈3,570 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сразу четыре игры, которые я жду, выйдут в течение одного месяца — с конца августа по конец сентября. Давно не было такого насыщенного на интересные мне игровые релизы периода. А пока с большим удовольствием играю в 007: First Light, которое получилось практически идеальным приключением – динамичным, разнообразным и зрелищным.

👍31❤‍🔥164

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dmitrii_sff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 203,982 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фантастика с Дмитрием Злотницким” (@dmitrii_sff), 4,413 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmitrii_sff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.