Channel
@dm2man
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
328subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001612597791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dm2man |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dm2man |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 328 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 331 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 331 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (29 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 709 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
111 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 88 | 79.3% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 7.21% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 4.50% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.60% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.60% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Рыцари справедливости» — комедия, но с полным боли глазами Мадса Миккельсена. Понравилась. Фильм с иронией размышляет на тему взаимосвязанности событий, которые приводят к другим событиям смыслах, которые в них заключаются. Сюжет разворачивается вокруг трагедии, которую проживают герой Миккельсена со своей дочерью — в железнодорожной аварии погибает его жена (и по совместительсту мать). И вот, каждый своим способо…
❤1🕊1
Для меня вдохновение это про причастность и возможность разделить результат с другими. Иными словами, про сделать что-то большое. И собрать лайки. По этому принципу я делал всё то, что я делал: писал музыку, собирал группы, выступал на концертах, потом делал дизайн, запускал продукт в Додо, сейчас это дизайн-студия. Всё это подходит под категорию "большое", всё это приносит результат, который можно пролайкать. Начин…
❤7
Хз как этот тредс работает, короче. Реально интересно стало, а в ответ тишина. Вот вы, как думаете, что есть вдохновение? Именно не откуда берётся, а что это за сущность такая?
🕊4❤1
Вот такие вот мишишки получаются, если слепо следовать правилам. А вообще, я считаю, что в заголовках надо отзеркалить правило о висячих предлогах. И относится к ним как к знакам препинания. Ну и в таких ситуациях как на фото, смотреть в первую очередь на контекст.
❤11🥰1
Важнейшая инфа для дизайнеров. Как повысить свои шансы на сотрудничество с дизайн-студиями и клиентами на фрилансе.
❤5
Ребят, подаём кейс на G8. Нужен дизайнер / моушен, чтобы собрать кайфовый шоурил. В шоуриле надо будет показать яркую, болдовую упаковку, раскрыть идею проекта, выстроить повествование, расставить акценты. Более подробно погрузим уже в лс. Если делали такое, пишите @dmitry2man Сразу прикладывайте примеры работ.
❤4
Сижу дома, на улице ливень. Первая мысль: выходной день, нет бы пойти гулять, так нужно дома сидеть. Вторая мысль: в целом, ситуация кайф. Вот в походе, несколько часов лежал под дождем в палатке и было очень здорово. А дома у меня столько занятий (в сравнении с палаткой), уж точно что-нибудь выберу. Как минимум, могу так же полежать, да ещё и в окно посмотреть. Вообще, мне очень понравился поход. В походе, кроме …
❤8😁7🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤13🥰2
Го в тредс. Там другое threads.com/@dmitry2man
❤10
Короче, главная опасность в создании ИИ-контента — это скорость. Точнее возможность сделать наскоряк. Можно быстро получитьаа картинку, впечатлиться соотношением времени создания и результатом и опубликовать. И не успеть понять что результат бредовый. Получается, что "чем выше скорость, тем больше ответственность". Может показаться, что нет смысла подключать сильных спецов — инструмент ведь у всех один. А нифига. …
❤6👍2🔥1😁1
Разница между хорошей генерацией и плохой — несколько часов работы. То есть, чтобы было ок, надо просто пустить в прод не первое получившееся, а чуть-чуть посидеть ещё и поправить детали. Тем не менее этот лайтбокс существует. Почему? Весь ужас в комментах:
❤5
Прямо как в легенадрной рекламе Дракулы. Два года мимо этого театра хожу, только сейчас заметил эти тени-веревочки у кукол.
❤10🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dm2man. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 93,050 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дима Туманов” (@dm2man), 328 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dm2man.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.