【时间】:2026-11-09 【老师】:布丁 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】: 【综合】:10 【过程】:环境评分就不写了因为这是第二次出击 第一次去老师那里 很干净 第二次直接叫了老师来家里pp 各方面我都打10分是因为老师确实值得 首先老师是个娃娃脸 看起来特别年轻 像个少女 第一次去老师那里老师是带妆的 这次老师素颜来 颜值也特别能打 总之就是化妆素颜都好看 而且很感动的是 大半夜的老师愿意打车20多公里过来找我 全程笑眯眯的 也很乖 基本要求不过分的老师都配合 反正兄弟们找布丁老师就没错 真心推荐

Channel
大连精品修车车评报告
@dlcbcp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
31,087subscribers
+16,844 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003338894673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dlcbcp |
| Description | 群 https://t.me/DLsk0411 榜 https://t.me/dlrz66 上榜咨询 @DLQMbot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dlcbcp |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 31,087 | +21 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:24 | 31,066 | -34 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:28 | 31,100 | +44 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:45 | 31,056 | +95 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:29 | 30,961 | +90 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 30,871 | +108 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:21 | 30,763 | +45 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 30,718 | +66 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 30,652 | +33 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 30,619 | +89 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:39 | 30,530 | +44 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 30,486 | +66 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 30,420 | +136 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 30,284 | +210 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 30,074 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:45 | 30,078 | +144 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 29,934 | +185 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 29,749 | +166 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 29,583 | +221 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 29,362 | first reading |
Engagement
360 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.50%
- avg views ÷ 31,087 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 468
- 237 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.202%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 237
- of 360 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 237 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 360 (12 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 110,836 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 805
- Videos
- 66
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3m 42s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 69 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 60.6% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 15.6% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 12.8% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 3.67% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.83% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.917% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 360 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 360 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 237 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:超甜呀 【留名】:otto 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9.99 【综合】:10 【过程】:大雪天cj,可以说是风雨无阻了,第一次来超甜老师这里,人照无差很漂亮,身材也很好,活也不错,可惜今天123了,值得二次出击
【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:悦栖spa 【留名】:jiaoziDM 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9.5 【综合】:9.92 【过程】:可可老师跟轩轩老师配合非常默契,让我流连忘返,两个都非常漂亮可爱美丽动人,忍不住让人想亲几口,么么哒,推荐哦
【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:念念 【留名】:shan6666 【人照】:9.8 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.3 【过程】:很嫩,瘦,态度很好,爱笑。口活舒服。不会写见谅。
【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:悦栖spa 【留名】:ElizabethClark 【人照】:9.9 【颜值】:9.8 【身材】:9.9 【服务】:10 【态度】:9.9 【环境】:9.8 【综合】:9.88 【过程】:得劲,兄弟们懂的都懂,值得推荐,很舒服,
【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:冰柠檬 【留名】:昊天 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.33 【过程】:123走人,没描述
【时间】:2026-11-07 【老师】:妍希 【留名】:YYY 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:戒色了一周,为什么是一周,因为妍希老师红休了一周😜。老师叒换了新教室,新教室停车方便,挺好找,一开门妍希老师穿的白色厚厚睡衣大眼睛一眨一眨的,真是可爱爆了,还调皮的给我展示了睡衣内的真空,火速水费,褪去罗衫,小荷才露尖尖角,早有蜻蜓立上头。这次好好的体会了妍希老师的全套服务,可能是戒色太久,也可能是对妍希老师太过想念,感觉老师的身材越来越对味了,🍑和🐻的手感夯爆,一拍起来软软弹弹,边动边🐍一点不糊弄,真是让人极致的欢愉,上完课腿都微微发软了,今天可以睡个好觉了。祝兄弟们天天开心,希望英博明日得冠。
❤1
【时间】:2026-11-07 【老师】:丝羽 【留名】:ww 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:第三次来找KK宝宝啦🥰 一进门就收获了一个拥抱,瞬间感觉这几天的想念都值了!洗完澡还会贴心地帮忙擦身体,真的很温柔很细心。该温柔的时候温柔,该狂野的时候又一点都不含糊,每次体验感都拉满😂 每次都被KK宝宝清空弹夹,只能先回去好好休息一阵子,攒足子弹再来找KK宝宝啦!下次见❤️
【时间】:2026-11-07 【老师】:布丁 【留名】:威尔喵 【人照】:9.5 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】:9.5 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9.5 【综合】:9.67 【过程】:俏丽若三春之桃,清素若九秋之菊。 今日天冷,适宜出击。 千挑万选中,忽见群里布丁打卡,OK,缘分来了~ 按照约定时间到达教室(布丁记早了时间,以为过时了,也没催我我),楼下保安玩忽职守,只能劳烦老师亲自来接。入眼便是一个俏美佳人,她探出头来,对我娇俏一笑,感觉对了! 抱着无限的期待一同进了教室,发觉教室干净整洁,一次性用品都有,很不错。寒暄了一会儿,虽是第一次见面,但并无任何生疏,巧笑嫣兮,顾盼生姿,情绪瞬间就被调动起来了,开始正题。 主动陪洗,调试水温,给小弟弟直接就洗起立了。擦干上床,此处省略一万个字。小舒服之后,直接P改PP,变成大舒服!贤者时间里抱着一起刷刷视频,谈天说地,很有生活气息,老夫逝去的恋爱感好像回来了。。。 总结…
【时间】:2026-11-07 【老师】:悦栖spa 【留名】:小胖 【人照】:10 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.83 【过程】:虽然不是同一个时间同一个地点同一个老师,但是是同一个悦栖spa,今天我小胖挑战一把二次出击悦栖spa,体验依旧美好! 背后指划胸划不用多说,正面挑逗更是让人欲罢不能,佳佳老师服务让我很有感觉,只能说悦栖spa,不怕踩坑,兄弟们没问题,可以冲
【时间】:2026-11-07 【老师】:养乐多 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:9.8 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9.7 【综合】:9.92 【过程】:符合我的审美,服务态度特别好,项目齐全,路过大连很好的一次体验!
【时间】:2026-11-07 【老师】:糖糖 【留名】:梨子 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:很好,老师脚很好看,很有耐心,毒龙很爽,一直在顶,比照片里年轻
Showing the 12 most recent of 360 posts we hold for @dlcbcp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @dlcbcp as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 27 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 27 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 23 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大连精品修车车评报告” (@dlcbcp), 31,087 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dlcbcp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.