Channel
@dl_research
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,979subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002196750250 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dl_research |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dl_research |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 1,979 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 1,981 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 1,984 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,986 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 1,986 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 29.6% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Japan's regulatory clarity is becoming a competitive advantage in enterprise blockchain. Startale Group CEO Sota Watanabe sat down with us to discuss vertical integration, the JPYSC and USDSC stablecoin pair, and building compliant onchain infrastructure. Full interview here.
👍1
A wallet tied to one of crypto’s most notorious hackers is laundering funds again
From this week’s The Decentralised: $300M pledged as DeFi responds to Kelp DAO breach An impromptu recovery fund called DeFi United has raised more than $302 million to cover losses from the Kelp DAO hack, with Arbitrum DAO, Mantle, and Consensys each pledging at least 30,000 Ether, and Aave Labs CEO Stani Kulechov contributing 5,000 Ether of his own. Even parties largely unaffected by the exploit have joined in, wi…
Bitcoin developer wants to hard fork the network — and give away Satoshi coins
🔥1
95% of EU crypto derivatives volume was offshore. Until now. After OKX announced MiCA-regulated X-Perps at Paris Blockchain Week, we spoke to OKX Europe CEO Erald Ghoos about bringing perps volume back onshore and the future of regulated trading in the EU. More in this interview.
❤1
"Users who take the risk of holding a stablecoin deserve a share of the returns. Otherwise the system mirrors a traditional bank." At Paris Blockchain Week, we spoke with Usual Money's Pierre Person about who stablecoins really work for and how he's changing it.
💯2👍1
From this week’s The Decentralised: DeFi's post-Kelp doom and gloom A $293 million exploit of Kelp DAO and LayerZero has sent shockwaves through DeFi, but it is the industry's response as much as the hack itself that has people rattled. Arbitrum's 12-member security council froze $72 million in assets sitting on the chain, a near-unprecedented move that, while celebrated by some, prompted Curve Finance founder Micha…
❤1
MiCA gave Europe a framework. But practical adoption still isn't harmonised across the EU. OpenPayd CEO Iana Dimitrova spoke to us about regulation, stablecoins, and the real friction points in fiat-to-digital infrastructure during Paris Blockchain Week.
👍1
"Hey LlamaAI: Zachxbt just hit 1 million followers on X. Plot a historical chart of projects that were called out by Zach as being malicious, and focus on the effect on project TVL after being flagged." The following responses were generated by DefiLlama's LlamaAI. 🦙🤖🦙🤖🦙🤖🦙🤖🦙🤖🦙🤖 Try LlamaAI out for yourself: https://defillama.com/ai
Testing can only prove that bugs exist. Formal verification is the only way to guarantee code is truly bug-free. CertiK CEO Ronghui Gu tells DLR why investors are demanding formal proofs, and why AI-generated smart contracts are making that more urgent in this Paris Blockchain Week interview.
👍2
Most DeFi vaults are still optimising for the wrong thing. APY is the output. Risk management is the product. Sentora's VP of Research Juan Manuel Pellicer on why the next era of vaults will be won by risk-aware automation and AI-assisted curation.
👍2
From this week’s The Decentralised: 'Aave will win'? Three of Aave DAO's longest-serving service providers have announced their departures from the collective, citing what they describe as a growing concentration of power around Aave Labs, the company run by protocol founder Stani Kulechov. The exits follow a landmark funding vote that will see the DAO provide Aave Labs with $25 million in stablecoins and 75,000 AAV…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dl_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 556,944 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DL Research” (@dl_research), 1,979 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dl_research.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.