Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🦅 DIYORNWS 🦅

Channel

🦅 DIYORNWS 🦅

@diyornvs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002545148635
TypeChannel
Username@diyornvs
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/diyornvs

Growth

15315915613 August 2026 — 159 subscribers14 August 2026 — 159 subscribers21 August 2026 — 156 subscribers29 August 2026 — 153 subscribers13 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 10:56153-3
21 Aug 2026, 16:35156-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:26159no change
13 Aug 2026, 18:04159first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1035.7%
517.9%
🖕310.7%
🥰310.7%
🍌27.14%
👻27.14%
🔥27.14%
😁13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 22:16 UTCviews —

🦅 DIYORNWS 🦅 pinned «Bollla chit kerak bolsa lechkaga yoziyla @diyorvns chit narxi 15 mng sum oziyla qoyib olasila urnatib berish bilan 35 mng sum»

13 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC113 viewsread 13 August 2026

Bollla chit kerak bolsa lechkaga yoziyla @diyorvns chit narxi 15 mng sum oziyla qoyib olasila urnatib berish bilan 35 mng sum

15 Jun 2026, 09:24 UTC282 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Kutla chiqib ketdi e yana xazilashdim mana id 51613791835 nikylani chatga tashayla oynayman 🪓

🤣3🔥2😁1

15 Jun 2026, 09:17 UTC281 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Instgramdan 1v1 uynaylik deb keganla dnx 🖕🏻🥲xazilashgandim odam yig’moqchi edim shunday qilib 🙌

🤣4

11 May 2026, 16:02 UTC380 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰21

11 May 2026, 16:01 UTC355 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1🥰1

9 May 2026, 16:08 UTC349 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Bila bu ketishda 10 yilga ban omasam bo’ldi bu optmizatsiya chit emasmi 🤣

9 May 2026, 16:04 UTC323 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Yangi optimizatsiya kimga kerak busa aloqaga chiqasila video o’zmasdan natijani kordiyla 😆💪🏻

28 Apr 2026, 19:42 UTC328 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

you tubeda uc lobi top 1ga 1200 uc go kiramiz id 8894675

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @diyornvs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 375,009 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦅 DIYORNWS 🦅” (@diyornvs), 153 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diyornvs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.