Channel
@diwk1101
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,129subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001790078456 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diwk1101 |
| Created | 22 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diwk1101 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 1,129 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 1,128 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 1,128 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (29 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,543 |
| Reactions total | 621 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,276 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5312468700807331124 | 909 | 39.9% | |
| custom 5287558616340007161 | 774 | 34.0% | |
| custom 5287403761294153188 | 593 | 26.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
искренне восхищаюсь этой обложкой, святые точно услышали мои молитвы 🙏надеюсь, что и сама книга не разочарует, а ли в очередной раз попадет в сердце
custom 531246870080733112446custom 528740376129415318828custom 528755861634000716126
'мрачный взвод. двенадцать дней коляды' 🔤аюсь, мусолила эту часть больше месяца, несмотря на всю эстетику каляды. глухие леса и древняя бесовщина влюбляют в себя с первых страниц, но продираться сквозь сам сюжет было тяжко. главный минус для меня это любовный треугольник, потому что он тут абсолютная хуйня (🤩) и вызывает только желание закрыть книгу. главная троица продолжает бесить: варна все такая же эгоистка, св…
custom 531246870080733112430custom 528755861634000716118custom 528740376129415318813
обожаю по пять минут разглядывать карту на форзаце новой фэнтези книги, будто я реально собираюсь отправляться в этот опасный поход вместе с героями
custom 531246870080733112484custom 528755861634000716143custom 528740376129415318834
если вы проснулись сегодня ночью из-за громких звуков со стороны, то не переживайте, это просто уайлен уронил свои склянки с горючим
custom 531246870080733112478custom 528740376129415318842custom 528755861634000716141
мне кажется, когда джеспер возвращается к отцу, он острее всего чувствует, насколько сильно бочка его искалечила. джес искренне хочет помочь с урожаем, но пальцы за годы перестрелок привыкли только к тяжести оружия, они стали слишком грубыми и резкими для земли. он ломает стебли растений, а без кобур на бедрах буквально теряет баланс. кеттердам поглотил его целиком, оставив пальцам лишь одно страшное умение, нажимат…
custom 528740376129415318857custom 531246870080733112442custom 528755861634000716139
даже человек, встретивший свою настоящую любовь, не поймет чувств девочки, которая впервые увидела бена барнса в роли сириуса блэка 😎
custom 531246870080733112487custom 528740376129415318848custom 528755861634000716147
каждый раз, приходя на вскрытия, я примерно понимаю, что чувствовал бреккер на барже жнеца
custom 528755861634000716162custom 528740376129415318838custom 531246870080733112438
откопала старые архивные снимки прадедушки в молодости. 1930 год, рабочий перерыв, и его друг, который решил поймать этот момент на камеру 🤩
custom 528755861634000716174custom 528740376129415318850custom 531246870080733112446
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 528755861634000716124custom 53124687008073311248custom 52874037612941531884
dad's on a hunting trip and he hasn't been home in a few days. A.B. maybe¿
custom 528755861634000716155custom 531246870080733112439custom 528740376129415318837
у этого канала вайб книги с мягкой обложкой или с твердой?
custom 528755861634000716149custom 531246870080733112424custom 528740376129415318821
вороны как-то поспорили на десять крюге, сколько каз продержится без своего хмурого лица (он сорвался на третьей секунде из-за дурацкого анекдота джеспера). сейчас в клепке стало так тихо, что каз отдал бы всё золото бочки, чтобы его снова так же бесило это чужое присутствие
custom 528755861634000716170custom 531246870080733112447custom 528740376129415318839
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @diwk1101. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 672,739 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“do i wanna know? 🕸️” (@diwk1101), 1,129 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diwk1101.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.