Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Divis — маркетинг ?

Channel

Divis — маркетинг ?

@diviszar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

216subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003847117005
TypeChannel
Username@diviszar
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 17 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/diviszar

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

216241228.57 August 2026 — 241 subscribers8 August 2026 — 241 subscribers15 August 2026 — 233 subscribers22 August 2026 — 231 subscribers29 August 2026 — 229 subscribers15 September 2026 — 224 subscribers30 September 2026 — 219 subscribers11 October 2026 — 216 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 65 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 212–245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 11:38216-3
30 Sept 2026, 15:38219-5
15 Sept 2026, 07:01224-5
29 Aug 2026, 08:26229-2
22 Aug 2026, 16:42231-2
15 Aug 2026, 05:46233-8
8 Aug 2026, 09:48241no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:31241first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

213 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5626.3%
❤3616.9%
❤‍🔥3114.6%
⚡219.86%
🤔198.92%
🤯157.04%
🥰136.10%
😁83.76%
🤩62.82%
😍41.88%
✍20.939%
👨‍💻20.939%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2026, 08:34 UTCviews —

Divis — маркетинг ? pinned «Замечали ли Вы, те факты, которые мы разбирали на этой неделе??»

15 Mar 2026, 07:31 UTC140 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

История Lego — как бренд чуть не умер в начале 2000-х Lego был на грани банкротства. они делали слишком много наборов, усложнили ассортимент и теряли деньги. спас их один простой шаг: вернуть фокус на базовые линии. вывод: иногда инновации мешают. иногда спасает простота.

⚡2❤‍🔥2🔥2😁2🤯1

13 Mar 2026, 07:32 UTC102 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Замечали ли Вы, те факты, которые мы разбирали на этой неделе??

  1. Да27%
  2. Нет45%
  3. Теперь начинаю замечать27%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Mar 2026, 07:35 UTC136 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейромаркетинг: запахи, которые заставляют покупать запах хлеба в супермаркете — не случайность. ваниль — вызывает доверие. цитрус — ощущение чистоты. древесные ноты — премиальность. минимум слов — максимум химии.

🔥4❤‍🔥2🤔2🤩1🤯1

9 Mar 2026, 07:34 UTC131 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Миф о внимании: люди читают меньше, чем кажется правда: люди читают, но не так, как ты думаешь. они сканируют: • большие слова • первые и последние строки • цифры • эмоции поэтому текст в рекламе должен быть коротким и эмоциональным. просто факты — не работают.

⚡2❤2🔥2🤩1

5 Mar 2026, 07:31 UTC198 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

разбор рекламы — что спрятано в ролике возьми любую рекламу напитка. что там увидишь? • люди улыбаются • компания • движение • крупные планы всё потому что нам важны эмоции, социальное одобрение и ощущение «счастье = продукт». никто не продаёт напиток — продают настроение.

❤2😍2⚡1🔥1🤩1

2 Mar 2026, 12:36 UTC129 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Понравилась ли вам прошлая неделя?

  1. Конечно!59%
  2. Пойдет18%
  3. Не совсем6%
  4. Нет18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2026, 09:00 UTC204 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

маркетинг боли: почему минусы сильнее плюсов наш мозг устроен так, что негативные стимулы в 2–3 раза сильнее позитивных. поэтому в рекламе часто делают так: «не теряй», «не упусти», «не переплати». наш мозг защищает нас от боли — и бренды используют этот рефлекс.

🔥5❤3🤔3⚡1❤‍🔥1

1 Mar 2026, 07:31 UTC151 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

микроистория с неожиданным выводом Amazon однажды увеличил продажи книги на 20%, просто… убрав цену доставки в одной стране. во всех странах ввели бесплатную доставку, а во франции поставили 0.20€. итог: во всех странах продажи выросли, а во франции — нет. когда цену понизили с 0.20€ до 0€, вот тогда продажи взлетели. мораль: 0 — это не просто число. наш мозг реагирует на него не как на «очень дешево», а как на «…

🔥5🤯3❤2⚡1❤‍🔥1🤩1

28 Feb 2026, 07:10 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какую тему ты хочешь, чтобы мы разобрали на следующей неделе?

  1. манипуляции в рекламе22%
  2. когнитивные искажения11%
  3. истории брендов22%
  4. разборы маркетплейсов6%
  5. психология выбора39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Feb 2026, 07:11 UTC169 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

психологический триггер — социальное доказательство мы верим людям. даже незнакомым. особенно если их много. поэтому: • «бестселлер» • «топ‑1 на маркетплейсе» • «этот товар купили 1347 раз» • «выбирают 9 из 10» • «номер 1 в России» всё это работает сильнее, чем логические аргументы. социальное доказательство говорит нашему мозгу: «другие уже проверили — значит, и тебе можно». и да… большинство этих надписей нельз…

❤‍🔥6❤4😁4🔥2🤔1🤯1

26 Feb 2026, 07:11 UTC200 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

маркетинг вокруг нас — разбор ценников в супермаркете замечал(а) такую штуку? ценники часто оформлены так, чтобы казаться… выгоднее. несколько фишек: • крупная часть — новая цена • мелкая — старая (чтобы мозг не успел сравнить нормально) • жёлтый или красный фон — «срочная» скидка • иногда цену делают неровной: 199 вместо 200, 49.90 вместо 50 и самое хитрое: «скидка» может быть не скидкой. часто цену повышают, пот…

🔥7🤔4❤‍🔥2⚡1❤1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @diviszar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Mar 2026, 07:32 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Замечали ли Вы, те факты, которые мы разбирали на этой неделе??

  1. Да27%
  2. Нет45%
  3. Теперь начинаю замечать27%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2026, 12:36 UTCFinal Results17 voters

Понравилась ли вам прошлая неделя?

  1. Конечно!59%
  2. Пойдет18%
  3. Не совсем6%
  4. Нет18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Feb 2026, 07:10 UTCFinal Results18 voters

Какую тему ты хочешь, чтобы мы разобрали на следующей неделе?

  1. манипуляции в рекламе22%
  2. когнитивные искажения11%
  3. истории брендов22%
  4. разборы маркетплейсов6%
  5. психология выбора39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Feb 2026, 07:11 UTCFinal Results23 voters

Как вы думаете, красный цвет повышает продажи?

  1. Да30%
  2. Нет30%
  3. Не уверен(а)39%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 16 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Divis — маркетинг ?” (@diviszar), 216 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diviszar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.