Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DIVINE CRYPTO

@divine_crypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001838992420
TypeChannel
Username@divine_crypto
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/divine_crypto

Growth

1279 Aug 2026, 15:46 — 127 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:18 — 127 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:4610 Aug 2026, 02:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:18127no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:46127first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1260.0%
525.0%
💩315.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2024 to 6 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2024, 18:56 UTC185 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Взял токен свапалки на Zora на копейку 150к капа Свапнуть можно только у них на свапалке 0xf05585457acdff218713e30d1d108bb8f022e03b https://riftswap.com/#/swap Они еще раздали airdrop который сейчас оценивается в 2 бакса upd вдампили до 80к

28 Feb 2024, 13:40 UTC410 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Такое время интересное , надо бекатся

5

21 Feb 2024, 20:35 UTC487 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Airdrop от Unibot Чекнуть дали ли вам деньги тут - https://t.me/solana_unibot ок выше тупой байт на рефку но Airdrop будет , так что пофлипать щитки на солане смарт , покрутить чуть обьема не помешает Их пост - https://twitter.com/UnibotOnSolana/status/1760373185311383895

👍4

16 Feb 2024, 15:29 UTC299 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Взял от них телефончик еще

👍4

4 Feb 2024, 15:27 UTC423 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Не ректа нету +3 сол но мб рано продал

💩3

31 Jan 2024, 20:20 UTC451 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @yocryptoru

Есть токен, который за год 7 раз делал х2-4 и откатывался обратно. Трижды я покупал дно в районе 0.007$ и холдил до х2. Недавно он рос с 0.006 до 0.026 (я зафиксировал х2, а мог дождаться х3, но не стал). Имя этому токену Squid Game. Тот самый, что на хайпе 1 сезона был рагнут и сделал со дна около 100х. Сегодня я купил SQUID на 25к баксов — это примерно мой профит за все торги с ним. Недавний рост с 0.006 до 0.026

👍3

31 Jan 2024, 19:01 UTC287 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://t.me/wmclick_bot/click?startapp=611999246 https://t.me/wmclick_bot/click?startapp=611999246 Зайдите тут хоть 1млн$ роздадут через 24 часа первый тестовый дроп у кого больше ляма арбузов(набить изи) Нищие пару копеек можно залутать я думаю, а если пару акков🤔

👍1

31 Jan 2024, 17:42 UTC249 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ну не свои 200 токенов ниже 1$ не солью

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @divine_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 562,182 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DIVINE CRYPTO” (@divine_crypto), 127 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/divine_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.