мы вернулись! бронируете роли под этим постом🤍 подписка на инфо обязательна @disneykinss роль пишите на английском сразу ставьте смайл в ник на 1 место
custom 54228278382333876889

Channel
@disneykinss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002091059831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @disneykinss |
| Description | союзы не заключаем! |
| Created | 21 January 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/disneykinss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 20 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 21 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
32 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5422827838233387688 | 23 | 71.9% | |
| custom 5222452078978286252 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5339481558313088147 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5249417889412298386 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5258189131753736229 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5346265776984699957 | 1 | 3.13% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2024 to 1 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мы вернулись! бронируете роли под этим постом🤍 подписка на инфо обязательна @disneykinss роль пишите на английском сразу ставьте смайл в ник на 1 место
custom 54228278382333876889
— ᴨᴏᴄᴛ дᴧя ᴛᴇх у ᴋᴏᴦᴏ бᴀн p.s ну ты и лох
custom 54228278382333876882
— ᴄᴨиᴄᴏᴋ ɜᴀняᴛых ᴩᴏᴧᴇй 𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐬‘ ::𝐬𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐚 𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞 ::𝐦𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐱 ::𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐫 ::𝐤𝐚𝐲𝐚 𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐨 ::𝐣𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚 𝐣𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 ::𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨 ::𝐤𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞 ::𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐛𝐞𝐬 ::𝐡𝐚𝐲𝐥𝐢𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐫 ::𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐚 𝐠𝐢𝐥𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭 ::𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐠𝐢𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐧 ::𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 ::𝐤𝐢𝐦 𝐤𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐚𝐧 ::𝐤𝐲𝐥𝐢𝐞 𝐣𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐫 ::𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞 𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐥 ::𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐭 𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐥 ::𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐥 ::𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐥 𝐛𝐨𝐲𝐬‘ :: 𝐣𝐨𝐚𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐚 ::𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐰 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐲 ::𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐧 𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 ::𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐜𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐨𝐫
custom 54228278382333876883
— ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧᴀ ::ниᴋ нᴇᴏбяɜᴀᴛᴇᴧᴇн ᴄʍᴀйᴧ ʙ ниᴋ 🎂 нᴀ 1 ʍᴇᴄᴛᴏ иᴧи ʙ ᴨᴩиᴄᴛᴀʙᴋу « 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐲 » « 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐲𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐚 » ::нᴏᴩʍᴀ 500ᴄᴏᴏ ʙ нᴇдᴇᴧю ::чиᴄᴛᴋᴀ ᴋᴀждый ᴨᴏнᴇдᴇᴧьниᴋ 🤩- ᴄᴨᴀʍ ᴩᴀɜᴩᴇɯᴇн! дᴏ ᴨᴇᴩʙᴏᴦᴏ ᴋᴀᴧᴧᴀ 🤩- ᴋᴏнᴛᴇнᴛ 18+ ɜᴀᴨᴩᴇщᴇн! 🤩- ᴄᴄᴏᴩы ʙ чᴀᴛᴇ ᴩᴀɜᴩᴇɯᴇны, нᴏ ʙ ʍᴇᴩу. нᴇ нужнᴏ ᴏᴄᴋᴏᴩбᴧяᴛь чᴇᴧᴏʙᴇᴋᴀ, ᴨᴇᴩᴇхᴏдиᴛь нᴀ ᴧичнᴏᴄᴛи и ᴛд
custom 54228278382333876882
ᴀдʍиниᴄᴛᴩᴀция: ʙᴧд - нᴀᴄᴛюɯᴀ ᴏбяɜᴀннᴏᴄᴛи: ᴨᴏиᴄᴋ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇдᴇниᴇ инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙᴏʙ чиᴄᴛᴀ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ ʙᴧиʙᴀниᴇ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ ᴄᴏʙᴧд - диля обязанности: поиск участников поднятие актива редактирование списков влив участников админки в чате ᴀдʍин - вита ᴏбяɜᴀннᴏᴄᴛи: ᴨᴏиᴄᴋ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ ᴨᴏдняᴛиᴇ ᴀᴋᴛиʙᴀ ʙᴧиʙ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ игры в чате ᴀдʍин - айли обязанности: поиск участников поднятие актива влив участников проведение интерактив…
custom 54228278382333876882
Channel photo updated
открываемся?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 54228278382333876881
дᴏбᴩᴏ ᴨᴏжᴀᴧᴏʙᴀᴛь ʙ диᴄнᴇй!! ʍы ᴏчᴇнь ᴩᴀды, чᴛᴏ ᴛы нᴀᴛᴋнуᴧᴄя(ᴧᴀᴄь) нᴀ ϶ᴛᴏᴛ ᴨᴏᴄᴛ , нижᴇ ʍы ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀжᴇʍ нᴇʍнᴏᴦᴏ ᴏ нᴀɯᴇʍ ᴨᴩᴇᴋᴩᴀᴄнᴏʍ чᴀᴛᴇ и ᴨᴏчᴇʍу ᴛᴇбᴇ ᴄᴛᴏиᴛ ʙ нᴇᴦᴏ ɜᴀйᴛи 🎂 " — диᴄнᴇй ɸ϶ʍ - чᴀᴛ ᴨᴏ ʙᴄᴇʍ ɸд, ʙ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩᴏʍ нᴇ нужны ниᴋи! " — чᴀᴛ быᴧ ᴄᴏɜдᴀн 31 ʍᴀᴩᴛᴀ 2023 ᴦᴏдᴀ , нᴏ иɜ-ɜᴀ ᴄᴧᴇᴛᴀ ᴀᴋᴋᴀунᴛᴀ у ʙᴧд чᴀᴛ удᴀᴧиᴧᴄя и ʍы ᴄᴏɜдᴀᴧи нᴏʙый(( " — ʙ нᴀɯᴇʍ чᴀᴛᴇ нᴀхᴏдяᴛᴄя ᴄᴀʍыᴇ ᴏᴛɜыʙчиʙыᴇ ᴧюди , ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыᴇ будуᴛ ᴦᴏᴛᴏʙы нᴇ ᴛᴏᴧьᴋᴏ ᴏᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ᴨ…
custom 54228278382333876884
𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 🎂— ᴄᴏ дня нᴀɯᴇᴦᴏ ᴄᴏɜдᴀния 31.03.2023, нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ « 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐲 » и ʙᴄᴇ ᴇᴦᴏ ɸᴏᴩʍы ᴨᴩинᴀдᴧᴇжᴀᴛ нᴀʍ. ᴇᴦᴏ иᴄᴨᴏᴧьɜᴏʙᴀниᴇ дᴧя ᴄʙᴏих чᴀᴛᴏʙ/ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴏʙ ᴄᴛᴩᴏᴦᴏ ɜᴀᴨᴩᴇщᴇнᴏ , ᴄᴏ ᴄʍᴇнᴏй/ᴏᴄᴛуᴛᴄʙиᴇʍ ᴋᴀᴋᴏй-ᴧибᴏ буᴋʙы ᴛᴏжᴇ. дᴀжᴇ ᴇᴄᴧи ʙ нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ будᴇᴛ ᴄᴧᴏʙᴏ 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐲 - чᴀᴛ/ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ будᴇᴛ ᴄчиᴛᴀᴛьᴄя ᴋᴏᴨиᴩᴏʙᴀнным 🎀— ᴄᴏ дня нᴀɯᴇᴦᴏ ᴄᴏɜдᴀния, 31.03.2023 , ᴨᴩᴀʙᴏ нᴀ ᴄʍᴀйᴧ «🎂» ɜᴀ нᴀʍи. 🐰— ᴏɸᴏᴩʍᴧᴇниᴇ нᴀɯᴇᴦᴏ инɸᴏ, ɸᴏᴛᴏ , ᴛᴇᴋᴄᴛ - ᴀʙᴛᴏᴩᴄᴋᴏᴇ. ᴨᴏʙᴛᴏᴩяᴛь ᴇᴦ…
custom 52224520789782862523custom 53394815583130881473custom 52494178894122983861custom 52581891317537362291custom 53462657769846999571
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @disneykinss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
открываемся?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2024 to 1 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,184,131 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@disneykinss named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎂𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐍𝐄𝐘 𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎” (@disneykinss), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/disneykinss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.