Channel
@dishapsc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,944subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001661536565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dishapsc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dishapsc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 14,944 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 14,947 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 An anomaly has been detected in the ETH/USDT pair on Virexon.io. The price is inflated—we’re already working on increasing trading volume and locking in profits 💸—now it’s your turn 🔥 Here’s how it works: Buy ETH on any exchange → transfer it to Virexon.io → sell at a higher price → make a profit → repeat the process ♻️ Hurry up before they adjust the price 😈
❤6
The creator of Bitcoin has been identified—The New York Times claims that cryptographer Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto The authors reached this conclusion after a year and a half of investigation. Back himself denies everything and says he worked only on Hashcash. Satoshi’s wallets currently hold about $78 billion in BTC
❤1
A happy ending? 👀 In just one day, Trump went from threatening to “destroy civilization” to declaring a two-week ceasefire. Progress has been made; the strait will soon be opened. Against this backdrop, oil prices are falling, while the markets and BTC are soaring. But don’t forget who you’re dealing with. This is Trump—tomorrow, his rhetoric could do a complete 180. So be prepared for any scenario and don’t let y…
❤1
A new gap has appeared in BTC at ~$67k 👀 So we could potentially return to this zone.
The whole world is now watching Trump's ultimatum 👀 He has set a final condition for Iran: either the parties agree to a ceasefire, or the US will destroy all of the country's key infrastructure. Deadline: 3:00 AM (Moscow time) Wednesday. If a ceasefire fails to materialize, this could lead to a new round of escalation. And, of course, there's strong market volatility again. So, be careful if you have open positi…
🚀 An error has been detected in the ETH/USDT pair on the valyx.io platform. The price is too high, so we're investing large amounts and taking a profit. 💸 We've already made a fortune. 🔥 The plan is simple: Buy ETH on any trading platform ← Transfer to valyx.io ← Sell at a higher price ← Lock in profits ← Repeat the process ♻️ Get in while you can 😈
Here it is, digital resistance. And not your telegrams.
Dubai's Property Index Continues to Fall -40% in a month
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
🚀 An error has been detected in the ETH/USDT pair on the valyx.io platform. The price is too high, so we're investing large amounts and taking a profit. 💸 We've already made a fortune. 🔥 The plan is simple: Buy ETH on any trading platform ← Transfer to valyx.io ← Sell at a higher price ← Lock in profits ← Repeat the process ♻️ Get in while you can 😈
A new gap has appeared in BTC at ~$67k 👀 So we could potentially return to this zone.
Fidelity (an $8 trillion fund) has noted the strength of BTC relative to gold. However, the conclusion about a massive capital flow from one asset to the other is incorrect. This is an oversimplification. Bitcoin and the crypto market as a whole are not yet capable of absorbing the same volumes of liquidity as gold. This is more a localized dynamic than a real shift in the direction of large capital. If capital we…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dishapsc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DISHA PSC TRIVANDRUM” (@dishapsc), 14,944 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dishapsc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.