Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for пусть говорят.🔇

Channel

пусть говорят.🔇

@discussion_of_wirth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853767327
TypeChannel
Username@discussion_of_wirth
Descriptionпусть говорят что думают. 18.02.23 -
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 9 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/discussion_of_wirth

Growth

48 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:014no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:204first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 February 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋4315.3%
3211.4%
❤‍🔥289.96%
👍289.96%
👎269.25%
258.90%
🔥165.69%
💔144.98%
👏134.63%
💊103.56%
💯103.56%
🕊82.85%
🤝82.85%
🥰72.49%
🙏62.14%
🍓31.07%
🌭20.712%
🆒10.356%
🎃10.356%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2023 to 11 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Mar 2023, 13:52 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 1 month. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.

16 Feb 2023, 10:37 UTC317 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

смешно с девушек, которые яро топят за гетеро. но прекрасно понимая что почти 90% мужских персов в вирте это девушки, лезут с ними в отношения, а потом ноют.

7💊21❤‍🔥1🔥1🥰1

15 Feb 2023, 20:17 UTC225 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

почему так много Эванов и Эвансов? они как из поговорки "китайцы что на одно ебало"

👎2🔥2👏1🕊1

15 Feb 2023, 11:41 UTC226 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

те самые через чур рофли,которые обсирают по полной человека,что не понял их соо<<<<< вы блять по нормальному пишите,а не коверкайте каждую букву по тысяче раз 🤬

🥰611🍓1💊1🔥1🕊1

14 Feb 2023, 20:50 UTC238 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

в кф и кланах с названием venom/black venom совсем нет оригинальности, их было и есть оч дохуя.

👍31🔥1🕊1

14 Feb 2023, 20:30 UTC205 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

идите нахуй со своими качелями в общении.

🙏611❤‍🔥1💊1🔥1

14 Feb 2023, 19:49 UTC233 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

поисковые, которые ради одной ссаной анкеты заставляют подписываться на хуй знает сколько каналов и кидать скрины - ☠️

👏11❤‍🔥3👍311💯1🔥1

13 Feb 2023, 20:27 UTC295 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026

знаете, странное чувство, когда ты делаешь все для человека, прощаешь все его ошибки, а он начинает ненавидеть тебя за малейший косяк...

💔141❤‍🔥1💊1💋1🕊1

13 Feb 2023, 19:47 UTC235 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026

не вижу смысла набирать вз на свой блог, если это лишь мертвая аудитория.

82🤝2❤‍🔥1💊1💋1🔥1

13 Feb 2023, 19:07 UTC≈2,790 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ваше "вливайся" ну никак не поможет человеку влиться.

👍711🍓1💯1🔥1

12 Feb 2023, 22:47 UTC246 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

хэйтить людей с персом чбчг, только потому что он популярен просто вау 🫠

10💯2❤‍🔥1💋1🔥1

12 Feb 2023, 20:12 UTC314 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

вступать в отношения только потому что стало скучно а позже ливать - 🤡

82👏1💋1💯1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @discussion_of_wirth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 543,938 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“пусть говорят.🔇” (@discussion_of_wirth), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/discussion_of_wirth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.