Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for discussion club

Channel

discussion club

@discussconf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002055551182
TypeChannel
Username@discussconf
Description@discussconf_bot – бот для тейков <3
Created7 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/discussconf

Growth

257 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:4725no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:4925first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

338 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8324.6%
custom 5305593652167319769339.76%
🙏277.99%
custom 5458854625207657085226.51%
175.03%
👎175.03%
164.73%
🕊154.44%
💯133.85%
custom 5339385033218072384123.55%
💔92.66%
custom 544056267302661321482.37%
❤‍🔥82.37%
🍓72.07%
🥰72.07%
custom 520424645563987811061.78%
custom 546771181843462081851.48%
💋51.48%
😭51.48%
😱51.48%
9 further kinds185.33%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 338 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2023 to 26 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2024, 20:45 UTC177 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

оч важни тейк админка хорошуля @discussconf

🥰7👍1

26 Jan 2024, 20:40 UTC175 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

БОБИНЬ🫘🫘🙏🙏🙏🙏 БЕЩАСТИ ВСЕЛИЛИСЬ В ОСИНЫЙ БОБИНЬ🙏🙏🙏🐝🐝🐝🫘🫘🫘 @discussconf

👍7👏3💯2

26 Jan 2024, 20:24 UTC176 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ну не будет так бы и сказали

🙏9

6 Jan 2024, 09:21 UTC224 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

здравствуйте а тейки будут

🙏12👍2

23 Dec 2023, 09:58 UTC263 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я не понимаю людей, которые приписывают венгров к тюркам. Но ещё больше не понимаю, почему венгры сами себя считают тюрками @discussconf

👍7custom 533938503321807238431

16 Dec 2023, 17:26 UTC280 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026

кв насилие как чел который вырос в семье где мать тиранка и жоска хуярит тебя с детства меня заебало то что некоторые диванные критики эмоционально давят подобно на то почему ты до сих пор не обращаешься в службу спасения и бро как будто это так легко, особенно сложнее когда рядом сиблинги и все твои действия попытки разрешения могут оказаться на них, ты не можешь что то предусмотреть в будущем и тебе могут позволит

👍114🙏3😱2

10 Dec 2023, 19:00 UTC268 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

подскажите какую эмоцию юзать когда один из самых близких людей начинает психофобить и обесценивать все в момент вашего разрыва эмм шуд ай край..? адм: четвёртую @discussconf

💔9🕊3😱3custom 54677118184346208182🍓1

10 Dec 2023, 18:51 UTC216 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

что думаете про то что тихое прл плохой термин и похоже на рас и аспергер и часто тзв тихие прлщики буллят тех кто не может сдерживать себя и подлизывают психофобам мне кажется это похоже на ебанутых "высоконфукциональных" аутистов что высирают хуйню про других и говорят что они адекватные у них аспергер блять @discussconf

👍6🕊32🍓1🙏1custom 54587556433913510801

10 Dec 2023, 18:38 UTC192 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026

а вы тоже когда были кидами думали что шалтай болтай и шрек неплохо бы выглядели вместе или вы были нормальным ребенком @discussconf

custom 530559365216731976911custom 52042464556398781106😭2❤‍🔥1🍓1🕊1custom 53868284445605303811

10 Dec 2023, 18:29 UTC165 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

насчёт тейка про мью комьюнити как же анон прав тбх мне казалось что изначально мьюкм было создано для поиска друзей по интересам а в итоге там вечно срачки моя мечта все друзья конфликтов и срачей не существует и во всем мире гармония (я е9 в душе а ещё у меня тихое прл и мне нужно бежать от конфликтов) @discussconf

7custom 54611608723217520234🕊2🍓1custom 54677118184346208181

10 Dec 2023, 18:22 UTC145 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026

меня воротит от мьюкм @discussconf

💯9👍4❤‍🔥2💋2custom 5467711818434620818211🍓1

10 Dec 2023, 18:19 UTC155 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026

культ любви в обществе и в целом РОМАНТИЧЕСКАЯ любовь слишком переоценена типо ватафак??? 😭 я очень люблю и ценю любовь любую как платоническую как квирплатоническую как романтическую я очень люблю любую любовь и да нередко эта самая любовь сопровождает нас на протяжении всей нашей жизни но то как нам навязывают романтическую любовь с детства рассказывая сказки про принцев и принцесс которые в конце концов женятся то

👍93❤‍🔥2🍓2💋21💘1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @discussconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“discussion club” (@discussconf), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/discussconf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.