Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗦

@disciplesgroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

15subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002246335432
TypeChannel
Username@disciplesgroup
DescriptionПривет!! Мы 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗦 - независимая группа по прототипу ILLIT. Пожалуйста, подержите нас!
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/disciplesgroup

Growth

159 August 2026 — 15 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:1615no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:4515first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53753448229975082681834.6%
custom 53661544992221667051426.9%
custom 54362462437790278691121.2%
🕊917.3%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 6 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2025, 11:01 UTC77 viewsread 12 August 2026

Наш чудесный продюсер Мэри перешла на новый канал! Будем очень благодарны вашей подписке🤍

6 Feb 2025, 11:01 UTC60 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mariproducePhoto

✨🤍эри °°° 👱‍♀️ i love... 👁𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐈 // 🔤эри - модель и продюсер по продвижению в онлайн индустрии, только начинающая свой путь🤩 〰️связь со мной: @Marioibot 🌟𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡. #mari #aboutme

31 Jan 2025, 13:28 UTC62 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

🤍🤍 🔤𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓮 🤍🤍 𝑏𝑦. #manera ✨ @disciplesgroup ✨ #practice ➿➿➿➿➿ 💦 𝑆𝑜𝑛𝑔: 𝓘𝓰𝓵𝓸𝓸 - 𝓴𝓲𝓼𝓼 𝓸𝓯 𝓵𝓲𝓯𝓮 🤍 𝑃𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛! 🤍

custom 53661544992221667053custom 53753448229975082682custom 54362462437790278692🕊1

25 Jan 2025, 18:29 UTC≈1,280 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🦋🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🦋 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗦 туточки!! Мы решили составить свой крашлист. Ниже представлены каналы людей, которых мы очень любим и уважаем. @dallovegroup @cliocover @ispirato_oi @rouge_oi @nachi_songs @bl00m_z @colortaste_oi @shiyeonow @fate_prod @twoooookk @emistaloi @demure_oi @aoi_ya @elissshok @tellaoff @tsuname_oi @soulmate_oi Продолжайте в том же духе!! #DISCIPLES #CRUSHLIST

custom 53753448229975082686🕊4custom 53661544992221667053custom 54362462437790278692

24 Jan 2025, 14:48 UTC105 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Поздравляем крошек 𝗗𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗢𝗩𝗘 с первой соточкой!!!

custom 53661544992221667053custom 54362462437790278693custom 53753448229975082682🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @disciplesgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 735,966 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗦” (@disciplesgroup), 15 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/disciplesgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.