Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ГРЯЗНАЯ ПРАВДА

@dirtruth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46,256subscribers

-382 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002838826176
TypeChannel
Username@dirtruth
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dirtruth

Growth

46,25646,63846,44711 August 2026 — 46,638 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,599 subscribers13 August 2026 — 46,506 subscribers14 August 2026 — 46,256 subscribers11 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -382. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,199–46,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:5346,256-250
13 Aug 2026, 09:4646,506-93
12 Aug 2026, 10:2446,599-39
11 Aug 2026, 23:1646,638first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 46,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,720
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held21 (9 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total141,210
Reactions total6,162
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 40s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,162 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱1,58325.7%
🤮1,25620.4%
🤣81113.2%
73611.9%
🤬72511.8%
🤡5038.16%
😢4417.16%
👎741.20%
😐330.536%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 21 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dirtruth. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,560 views78 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

😱 В Польше две женщины избили украинцев, услышав их речь Полячки набросились на мужчин возле местного заведения, плевали им в лицо, били и выкрикивали оскорбления. Пострадавшие почти не сопротивлялись. @dirtruth

😱41🤬198🤣7🤡2😢1

14 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,950 views238 reactions4 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

😮 Партия «Яблоко» обжаловала их снятие с выборов в Госдуму Заседание по апелляции назначили на 17 августа. @dirtruth

203😐21😱13🤮1

14 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈4,310 views241 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤢 Парень занимался сексом с бабкой прямо в озере в Киеве на глазах у публики @dirtruth

🤮173🤣4114😱8🤬5

13 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC≈5,890 views436 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

😮 «Яблоко» окончательно сняли с выборов в госдуму Верховный суд признал законным отказ в регистрации партии из-за материалов на ее сайте. В них нашли следующие нарушения: строчку «пусть всегда будет солнце», фразу «лишь бы не было войны», кадр из советского фильма «война и мир» и картинку из chatgpt. @dirtruth

😢211🤡144😱25🤬20👎1914🤣2🤮1

13 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈5,630 views203 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤢 В Кемерове местный житель обезглавил голубя и выпил его кровь ЧОПовец решил стать вампиром — он схватил голубя, оторвал ему голову и выпил кровь. По словам местных, это не первый его раз. Очевидцы просят силовиков обратить внимание на кровопийцу. @dirtruth

😱100🤮71🤬216😢4👎1

13 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈6,110 views288 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤢 В Московской области учитель английского завёл отношения с 8-классницей Ученики Воскресенской школы выложили видео, где 23-летний учитель и ученица обжимаются в машине. После видео преподаватель сразу уволился. Написано заявление в полицию. @dirtruth

😱163🤮66🤬21🤣1411🤡5😐4😢3

13 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈6,070 views208 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

😭 В Туле 30-летняя женщина выбросилась из окна 16-го этажа По словам соседей, погибшая злоупотребляла алкоголем, а незадолго до трагедии от неё ушёл мужчина. @dirtruth

😱160😢31🤬123👎1🤣1

11 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC≈7,370 views264 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Video

😅 В Бишкеке две пассажирки подрались из-за места в автобусе Женщина попросила девушку уступить сиденье. Та молча встала. После этого женщина начала говорить, что «молодёжь не уважает старших», на что получила ответку и полезла в драку. @dirtruth

🤣20727😱12👎9🤡5🤬3😢1

11 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈7,090 views238 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤢 В Нижнем Новгороде онанист стоял на балконе и маст*рбировал на играющих во дворе детей @dirtruth

🤮193🤬17😱16🤣83😢1

11 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈7,370 views215 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤢 В Калуге наркоман устроил резню и читал молитву над жертвой Сначала он ранил ножом 52-летнюю женщину, а затем нанёс второй жертве не меньше семи ударов в шею и туловище, после чего поджёг квартиру и погнался за первой жертвой, которая смогла сбежать через окно. Догнав женщину, мужчина ударил её ножом в шею, сел сверху и начал читать молитву, называя истекающую кровью жертву «демоном». Обе женщины в больнице. Воз

😱149🤬31👎1210🤡10😢2🤣1

11 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈7,210 views170 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🤢 Пьяная мать столкнула 3-летнюю дочь с 9-го этажа в Сергиевом Посаде 27-летняя женщина выбросила девочку через ограждение балкона. Ребёнок выжил, но получил тяжёлые травмы. На допросе мать признала вину, но не смогла объяснить, зачем это сделала. По одной из версий, причиной могла стать послеродовая депрессия. СК предъявил ей обвинение в покушении на убийство малолетнего ребёнка. @dirtruth

😱126🤬32👎73😢2

11 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈7,830 views388 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

😭 В Питере росгвардеец без причины застрелил собаку на глазах у 13-летнего мальчика Машина росгвардии заехала на частный участок Ирины. Когда собаки с лаем побежали навстречу, один из мужчин открыл огонь и попал в собаку Плюшу. Раненая собака добежала до хозяйки и умерла прямо на глазах её сына. Плюша даже не коснулась стрелявшего. Гильзу изъяли, пулю нашли в теле собаки. Хозяйка готовит обращение в СК. @dirtruth

😱206🤬99😢42🤡27👎54🤮3🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dirtruth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 898,024 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГРЯЗНАЯ ПРАВДА” (@dirtruth), 46,256 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dirtruth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.