Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

"برامج الرّقية"

@directions12

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,856subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002416999269
TypeChannel
Username@directions12
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/directions12

Growth

2,8512,8562,853.59 Aug 2026, 17:47 — 2,851 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:48 — 2,856 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:4710 Aug 2026, 09:48
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,850–2,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:482,856+5
9 Aug 2026, 17:472,851first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.7%
avg views ÷ 2,856 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (16 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,627
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC564 viewsread 9 August 2026

💌💗💕——————— العنوان : مصطلحاتٌ سامةٌ تُؤذي النفوس (التعطيل، والمسُّ العاشق... أنموذجًا) https://t.me/ruqya7/7412

20 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته. للأسف، هذا ما أراده الشيطان منكِ ، وقد فعلتِه. فهو يشد عليكِ في قيام الليل وسورة البقرة ؛ لأن فيه هلاكه ونجاتكِ، لكنكِ استسلمتِ، ولم تجاهديه، وتركتِ ما يحبه الله و يكره الشيطان،فظفر بكِ، أخزاه الله وأعاذك منه وهل تظنين أنكِ هكذا تخلّصتِ منه؟ بالطبع لا،سيظلّ يتسلّط عليكِ، وسيتدرّج معكِ حتى تتركين قيام الليل بالكلية، ثم تتأخرين عن صلاة الفجر، وهكذا... حتى يفسد عليكِ كل عبادة، وهذه

19 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 9 August 2026

—✉️—— [رسالة لمن أصيب بالوسواس] الحمد لله .. وبعد . الله ردَّ كيد الشيطان إلى الوسوسة قال تعالى : ﴿. . إِنَّ كَيدَ الشَّيطانِ كانَ ضَعيفًا﴾ ونزع سلطانه، ولم يجعل له سلطانًا على المؤمنين؛ قال تعالى : ﴿إِنَّهُ لَيسَ لَهُ سُلطانٌ عَلَى الَّذينَ آمَنوا وَعَلى رَبِّهِم يَتَوَكَّلونَ﴾ فلماذا تصدقون وساوسه، وتستجيبون لما يمليه عليكم؟ وأنتم ، لو ظلمكم أحدٌ من الأنس أو افترى عليكم، لما سكتُّم حتى أخذتم حقكم. -فلماذا هذا ا

18 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 9 August 2026

حديث_شريف: جاءهُ ناسٌ من أصحابه فقالوا : يا رسولَ اللهِ ! نجدُ في أنفسِنا الشيءَ نعظِّم أن نتكلَّم به – أو الكلامَ به – ما نحبُّ أن لنا، وأنا تكلمْنا به، قال : أو قد وجدتموه ؟ قالوا : نعم ! قال : ذاك صريحُ الإيمانِ الراوي : أبو هريرة خلاصة حكم المحدث : صحيح

18 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 9 August 2026

#حديث_شريف: جاء رجلٌ إلى النبيِّ صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ فقال يا رسولَ اللهِ إنَّ أحدَنا يجدُ في نفسِه، يعرضُ بالشيء، لأن يكونُ حممةٌ أحبَّ إليه من أن يتكلَّم به، فقال : اللهُ أكبرُ، اللهُ أكبرُ، اللهُ أكبرُ، الحمدُ للهِ الذي ردَّ كيدَه إلى الوسوسةِ خلاصة حكم المحدث : صحيح

2 Jul 2026, 04:00 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ج| نعم، بإذن الله تنفع #للحامل ، لكن يُستثنى من ذلك السنا المكي، وكذلك الغسل بالكافور، فلا أنصح بهما للحامل لأته يُتداول بين الناس أن حتى رائحة الكافور قد تكون ضارة، وهذا أمر مشهور عرفًا، والله أعلم بمدى صحة ذلك. ولا يُمنع عن الحامل شيء إلا [السنا المكي والغسل بالكافور.] أما المسك فهو مجرد عطر، لكن تكمن المشكلة في أن بعض النساء يضعنه داخل مخرج الرحم، وهذا تصرف غير صحيح أصلًا، سواء للحامل أو لغير الحامل. وإن تركتِ

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @directions12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 34,905 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"برامج الرّقية"” (@directions12), 2,856 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/directions12.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.