Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Парусам нужен ветер

Channel

Парусам нужен ветер

@dinghy_club

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002707392261
TypeChannel
Username@dinghy_club
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dinghy_club

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

324337.57 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39 subscribers15 September 2026 — 41 subscribers29 September 2026 — 43 subscribers7 August 202629 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 53 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 20:3743+2
15 Sept 2026, 15:0141+2
8 Sept 2026, 01:1839+1
29 Aug 2026, 13:3938+5
22 Aug 2026, 19:5833+1
11 Aug 2026, 02:4532no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1432first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4246.7%
🔥1415.6%
🐳1011.1%
😱66.67%
😁55.56%
🍌33.33%
👾33.33%
🫡33.33%
👍22.22%
🥰22.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dinghy_club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2026 to 1 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC54 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Когда клинкерная обшивка решила, что она не лодка, а пропеллер ⚙️ #WorkshopLife

😁5🐳1

27 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC63 views6 reactions5 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🛶 Клинкерная обшивка: почему доски лежат внахлёст Корпус деревянной лодки можно обшить разными способами. При каравелльной обшивке кромки досок соединяются почти в одной плоскости, поэтому борт получается гладким. В клинкерной конструкции каждый следующий пояс обшивки немного перекрывает предыдущий. Получается поверхность, похожая на аккуратно уложенную черепицу. Но нахлёст нужен не только для красоты. Он образуе…

❤2🔥2🫡2

20 Jun 2026, 08:33 UTC81 views7 reactions5 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟Когда конструкция становится украшением Клинкерную лодку легко узнать даже издалека. Её борта состоят из длинных поясов, которые перекрывают друг друга и тянутся от носа к корме. Эти линии не нарисованы дизайнером поверх готового корпуса. Они и есть корпус. В этом, пожалуй, главная красота традиционного деревянного судостроения: конструкцию не прячут. Наоборот, она создаёт весь внешний образ лодки. На свету кромк…

❤5🐳2

19 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC70 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🕑Как ориентироваться в канале Чтобы публикации было проще находить, я разделил материалы на четыре постоянные рубрики. 🛠 #Technical Образовательные и технические публикации: устройство деревянных лодок, судостроительные термины, конструкции корпуса, обшивка и прочие термины присущее нише. Здесь разбираемся, как всё устроено и почему кораблестроители делают именно так. 🌈 #inspiration Красивые лодки, традиционные к…

❤5🐳2

14 Jun 2026, 20:09 UTC74 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Теоретическая поверхность: лодка, которой ещё нет ⛵️ Подведем небольшие теоретические итоги Прежде чем лодка становится фанерой, клеем, бронзовыми дельными вещами и запахом мастерской, она существует как поверхность. Не как набор досок. Не как корпус с толщиной материала. Не как красивая картинка. А как теоретическая поверхность корпуса. Это идеальная геометрическая форма лодки, по которой можно понять, какой долж…

❤3👾3👍2🫡1

7 Jun 2026, 12:07 UTC76 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пока я снова проверяю гладкость теоретической поверхности и пытаюсь моделировать клинкерную обшивку рекомендую ознакомиться с материалом (в котором описан швертбот цифровую копию которого я пытаюсь воспроизвести) дабы воспрянуть духом и пропитаться желанием ходить под парусом✅

❤4

24 May 2026, 15:02 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🥰vs🌳Компьютерная математика против живой фанеры Друзья, делюсь промежуточными итогами проектирования. Решил продолжить моделирование с клинкерный обшивки и сразу вляпался в 💩 Теоретическую поверхность я сделал, тест «зебры» пройден - корпус чистый… вроде…Но когда дошло до клинкерной обшивки (а у Swallow это аж 11 поясов!), я столкнулся с новой проблемой. При штатной разбивке шпангоутов на 11 равных частей по длине…

🔥2❤1

17 May 2026, 13:20 UTC101 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Тем временем главный конструктор 😎 #WorkshopLife

❤9😱3🥰2

17 May 2026, 10:10 UTC95 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Танкер отменяется, Swallow готов к спуску (пока виртуальному)! 🌊🛠️ Помните прошлый пост, где мой 14,5-футовый швертбот по расчетам плагина Orca3D внезапно выдал призматический коэффициент 0,73? Мы тогда еще шутили, что строим не изящный швертбот, а суровый нефтеналивной танкер или баржу с картошкой. Так вот — выдыхаем! Лодка не виновата, виновато восстание машин и кривая методика упрощенного расчета. Компьютер просто…

🔥7🐳3

13 May 2026, 08:31 UTC89 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Медитирую на обводы🧘‍♀️ #ЭстетикаСудостроения #WorkshopLife

❤5🍌3🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dinghy_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Парусам нужен ветер” (@dinghy_club), 43 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dinghy_club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.