Channel
@dineiro_expert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
970subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002080420232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dineiro_expert |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dineiro_expert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 970 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 976 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 983 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 988 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 988 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
498 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 263 | 52.8% | |
| 👍 | 142 | 28.5% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 9.04% | |
| 💯 | 36 | 7.23% | |
| 🤓 | 8 | 1.61% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.402% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.201% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.201% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 498reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Просто взгляните на соотношение количества просмотров на количество подписчиков в нашем закрытом канале в Мах: 66,6%😁 Цифра конечно огонь во всех смыслах. Но тем не менее, тестируем дальше различные способы продвижения. И честно сказать, мой любимый Telegram уже немного начинает хромать по отдаче( Хотя все еще приносит продажи нам и нашим клиентам. Как бы некоторые ни говорили, что Макс 💩, многие люди просто не в…
🔥3
Запросов на создание каналов в MAX в 20 раз больше, чем в Telegram И это не догадки, а реальная статистика из Вордстат. Вордстат - это сервис Яндекса, который показывает, сколько раз пользователи ищут тот или иной запрос. То есть мы видим не мнения, а реальный спрос аудитории. А теперь к практике 👇 Хочу поделиться своими наблюдениями. За последний месяц мы набрали с нуля в Максе: ❣️ 400+ подписчиков с Яндекс Дир…
🔥4👍2
💻Какой трафик приводит целевых подписчиков в любую соцсеть, в том числе в MAX? 3 недели назад я создала канал в MAX и мы с коллегой Катей протестировали разные способы продвижения: бесплатные, платные и те, на которые раньше не обращали внимание. И вот результат 👇 🍸Собрано почти 300+ целевых подписчиков 🦈Средняя стоимость — 53 ₽ за подписчика🫨 Для нас закупщиков в ТГ - это очень сильный показатель. Поэтому, реши…
❤3🗿2👍1👾1
Какой способ ведения канала для вас более комфортен?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
+42 заявки за 4 дня!! И основная часть из них по запускам в Телеграм. Вот это да... У меня тут назрел опрос 👇
❤2
Думаю, многим очевидна ситуация. О постепенной подготовке по переходу в Мах я записывала аудиоподкаст в ноябре. У нас было время набрать «свою аудиторию», которую можно вести за собой в любую другую соцсеть👌 Но а если аудитории до сих пор нет - открывается масса других интересных видов трафика и продвижения, которые ведут к заявкам и продажам!! 🙄Так что не унываем - а неспешно пересобираем свои блоги под новые реа…
💯5👍3
Планируете создавать каналы в Мах?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как создать Telegram-канал, который приводит заявки, а не просто подписчиков Большинство Telegram-каналов создаются по одному сценарию: придумали название, написали пару постов, начали звать подписчиков — и ждем результат. Но! Проблема в том, что подписчики ≠ заявки. Telegram-канал начинает приводить клиентов только тогда, когда изначально создается как ЧАСТЬ ВОРОНКИ ПРОДАЖ, а не как блог «для галочки». 📎Сохранит…
❤30👍2
Одна из банальных причин, почему у вас нет заявок👆 А вы проверяете путь вашего клиента от рекламы до продажи?
❤28👍10🔥7
Video message, posted without a caption
❤21💯18🤓8
Выбираем следующую тему ↘️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤54👍3
🎆Сегодня ровно 5 лет, как я начала свой путь в Telegram Я начинала в Telegram в 2021 году с небольшого новостника, мечтая стать профи. За эти годы было все: потери бюджета, факапы, скамеры. И параллельно — крутые знакомства, азарт первых крупных продаж и уникальный опыт продвижения в соцсетях. Сегодня у меня свое агентство DINEIRO и обучающий клуб специалистов в Telegram. И за это время сама площадка сильно изменил…
👍35❤21🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dineiro_expert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой способ ведения канала для вас более комфортен?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Планируете создавать каналы в Мах?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Выбираем следующую тему ↘️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 23 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 68,760 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dineiro_expert named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДИ НЕЙРО: Продвижение в соцсетях” (@dineiro_expert), 970 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dineiro_expert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.