14 measurements spanning 15 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,743–11,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 15:13
11,765
-2
21 Aug 2026, 04:55
11,767
-3
20 Aug 2026, 03:41
11,770
+1
19 Aug 2026, 04:47
11,769
+4
18 Aug 2026, 07:03
11,765
-6
17 Aug 2026, 10:14
11,771
+5
15 Aug 2026, 15:24
11,766
+5
13 Aug 2026, 00:04
11,761
+6
12 Aug 2026, 02:56
11,755
+2
11 Aug 2026, 06:21
11,753
+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:15
11,752
+3
9 Aug 2026, 02:32
11,749
+2
8 Aug 2026, 03:31
11,747
-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:18
11,749
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.4%
avg views ÷ 11,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,990
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
9 (13 June 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
19,940
Reactions total
1,962
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
260
Videos
63
Links
54
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,043 reactions across 9 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,502
37.2%
🔥
1,325
32.8%
❤
842
20.8%
❤🔥
131
3.24%
👏
52
1.29%
😢
44
1.09%
😍
30
0.742%
🏆
18
0.445%
🆒
16
0.396%
💯
10
0.247%
😭
10
0.247%
🤩
7
0.173%
💋
6
0.148%
💘
6
0.148%
🤝
6
0.148%
👨💻
5
0.124%
😁
5
0.124%
🤯
5
0.124%
😱
4
0.099%
🫡
4
0.099%
6 further kinds
15
0.371%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,043reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 9 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dimanchella_vlog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
22.2%
2 of 9 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
6,540
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,730
over 7 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHuUaq7
1
13 June 2026
13 June 2026
2W5zFJoH89w
1
4 July 2026
4 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 22 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Всем субботний нихао! 👋
На канале новое видео. Продолжаю мучить школьные учебники истории 😄
На этот раз сравнил, как российский и китайский учебники рассказывают о Корейской войне.
Тему эту часто просили разобрать сами китайцы. Поэтому выпуск изначально делал с прицелом на Bilibili, но мне хотелось выпустить его и для нашей аудитории. Всё-таки русскоязычный Ютуб никуда не делся, и я про него тоже не забываю.
Из и…
Друзья, всем нихао! ✊
В последнее время довольно плотно работаю с Bilibili, и там сейчас происходит много всего интересного.
Недавно выпустил для китайской аудитории видео про российские учебники истории. Разобрал, что у нас пишут о Китае. Реакция той стороны очень порадовала. Видео уже подбирается к 800к просмотров, китайцы встретили его очень тепло. Многих удивило, насколько подробно в наших учебниках вообще разб…
Есть ощущение, что после подписания контракта у меня станет намного меньше свободного времени. Скорее всего, это коснется и поездок с малыми группами по Китаю.
Но я уже дал слово людям, собрал группы и отказываться от своих обещаний не хочу.
Поэтому этой осенью состоятся две последние поездки. Думаю, это будет прощальный тур.
По наличию мест:
🇨🇳 16–25 сентября
Чэнду — Чунцин — Яньцзинь
Sold out
🇨🇳 17–27 октября
…
Неожиданное продолжение истории с китайским Ютубом (Bilibili).
Честно говоря, я вообще не ожидал, что все так закрутится.
За две недели канал с нуля вырос до 100 тысяч подписчиков. Всего с двух длинных видео. Открываешь главную страницу площадки, а там на первой полосе какой-то русский 😅
В личку посыпались десятки предложений рекламы. Правда, в основном это были массажёры, подушки, одеяла, утюги и прочая ерунда 😄
…
Я тут эксперимента ради зарегистрировал аккаунт на Bilibili. Это китайский аналог ютуба.
Пока новое видео про учебники потихоньку раскачивается у вас, в Китае оно за сутки набрало почти 500к просмотров. И это при том, что я просто перевёл его субтитрами. Безумие 🤯
Справедливости ради, стоит учитывать количество пользователей на площадке. По разным оценкам, на Bilibili их около 380 млн. Русскоязычному замедленному, …
Всем субботний нихао!
Короче, друзья, я вас немного обманул. Обещал тревел-выпуск, а нет. Пока тема горячая, пока люди просят, подготовил вторую часть по китайским учебникам.
На этот раз разобрал, что китайские школьники узнают о Советском Союзе: от советской помощи Китаю и индустриализации до конфликта двух стран и распада СССР. И бонусом разобрал комментарии китайцев в их соцсетях под моим предыдущим видео.
Ссыл…
Пока ездили по Китаю, несколько раз встречали на дорогах вот такие ретро-авто.
У всей группы они вызвали +- одинаковую реакцию: «Огооо, это чё за машина?!» 😮
Снаружи как будто из 50-х годов, но внутри уже современные технологии.
Кстати, в Китае с настоящими раритетными машинами всё сложно. Их очень мало, импорт старых авто ограничен, а долгое время старые машины вообще массово списывали. Поэтому китайцы пошли свои…
Забавная история получилась 🧐
После выхода моего видео про китайские школьные учебники истории китайцы быстро перевели его, залили к себе на площадки и начали обсуждать уже между собой. Некоторые перезаливы даже набрали больше просмотров, чем оригинал на YouTube.
Я не удержался и пошёл читать комментарии. Интэрэсно ж 🤓
Большинство комментов оказались вполне адекватными и даже тёплыми. Негатив тоже есть, куда без н…
Всем нихао! ✊
Обещанное видео про китайские учебники истории уже на канале.
Заметил, что зрители очень активно его комментируют, это приятно. Читаю дискуссии с большим интересом. Многие пишут свои мысли, спорят (куда без этого) и подкидывают идеи для следующих выпусков.
Среди интересного: предложили отдельно разобрать тайваньские школьные учебники и сравнить, чем их взгляд на историю отличается от материкового Кит…
👍205❤39😍14💋5🔥4❤🔥3💘3👨💻2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @dimanchella_vlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@dimanchella_vlog edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dimanchella” (@dimanchella_vlog), 11,765 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimanchella_vlog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.