Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дмитрий Першин | Речь лидера

@dima_pershin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

260subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661993668
TypeChannel
Username@dima_pershin
Description"Речь лидера" для руководителей, экспертов и предпринимателей. Разборы выступлений, практики уверенной речи и сторителлинг для роста влияния и бизнеса. 25+ лет опыта с компаниями уровня Сбер, Яндекс, Лукойл. Связь: @dibeas
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dima_pershin

Growth

2607 Aug 2026, 01:01 — 260 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:33 — 260 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:017 Aug 2026, 01:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 259–261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:33260no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:01260first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 260 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held14 (7 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total139
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
145
Videos
10
Links
51

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6032.3%
🔥4624.7%
👏4222.6%
👍168.60%
🥰136.99%
💋31.61%
💔31.61%
🎉10.538%
👌10.538%
🕊10.538%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
71
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 13 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dima_pershin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC42 views15 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый рилз - милости просим. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbajIXeO0RL/?igsh=MWJiMmRrdzVyd3A5aA==

7🔥3🥰3👏2

29 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC55 views18 reactions9 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👏64👍4🔥2🥰2

29 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC42 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сейчас активно стал вести инсту, добавляйтесь, кого еще там нет https://www.instagram.com/dimapershin_new?igsh=NjU5M2hwMThsdnRz&utm_source=qr

3👏3🔥3

1 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTCviews —

Дмитрий Першин | Речь лидера pinned «Привет. Этот пост как напоминание о том кто я и чем могу быть полезен, а также для новеньких в моем канале 😉 Если вы руководитель, эксперт или предприниматель и хотите говорить так, чтобы вам верили, покупали и следовали за вами - вы на правильном месте.…»

1 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC169 views15 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Привет. Этот пост как напоминание о том кто я и чем могу быть полезен, а также для новеньких в моем канале 😉 Если вы руководитель, эксперт или предприниматель и хотите говорить так, чтобы вам верили, покупали и следовали за вами - вы на правильном месте. 🎤 Я 10+ лет помогаю лидерам выступать уверенно и убедительно: 📌 работал с командами Сбера, Яндекса, Лукойла и других крупных компаний; 📌 вел проекты как телеведущ

7👏4🔥2🕊1🥰1

1 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC115 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫣 "Я опять нёс чушь на созвоне" - как подготовиться за 5 минут, чтобы этого больше не происходило Важные созвоны чаще всего "убивают" не аргументы, а то, как мы заходим в разговор: мямлим, извиняемся, прыгаем с темы на тему. Поэтому вот три мини‑упражнения, которые можно сделать за 5 минут до встречи - прямо за рабочим столом. 1️⃣ Запишите первое предложение вслух - не держите его в голове. Проговорите и запишите о

3👍2👏2👌1🥰1

24 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC122 views13 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Лаконичная, но сильная речь - это не «дар», а инструмент, который можно отточить так же, как стратегию или переговоры. Именно с этим я помогаю лидерам и командам: выстраиваю структуру выступлений, усиливаю личный стиль и делаю так, чтобы каждая встреча, презентация или интервью работали на ваши цели. 👉 Если хотите прокачать свою речь как инструмент влияния - напишите в личные сообщения или оставьте заявку, и я пре

6🔥3👍2🥰2

23 Jun 2026, 08:30 UTC123 views13 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Часто замечаю как последние годы в моду входят (или возвращаются) слова, которые раньше либо не употреблялись так массово, либо имели немного другой смысл. Иногда люди употребляют их не в корректных смыслах. Решил разобрать несколько примеров. По очереди. Начну со слова «Нишевый» Слово «нишевый» - это яркий пример того, как экономический термин становится модной характеристикой. Что означает «нишевый» сегодня В

7🔥4👍2

10 Jun 2026, 11:13 UTC143 views13 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥63👏2🥰2

5 Jun 2026, 07:04 UTC180 views13 reactions9 Starsread 7 August 2026

ИИ уже пишет лучше. А вот договариваться - пока нет 🤔 ИИ все лучше пишет тексты, рисует стратегии и придумывает скрипты. Но один навык ему по‑прежнему не дается - быть человеком в сложном разговоре. 🤝 В новой статье для HR Bazaar разбираю, почему в 2026 году дипломатия внутри команды дороже, чем еще одна лицензия на нейросеть. Три навыка, без которых AI-стек не спасет: 1️⃣ Честная аргументация без манипуляций. Лид

👏54👍2💋2

2 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC155 views22 reactions8 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отзывы моих учеников ⭐️ Недавно один из учеников прислал мне отзыв, и я публикую его с разрешения - в немного сокращённом виде. "Я шёл к Дмитрию с очень конкретной болью: каждый раз, когда нужно было выступать перед командой или клиентами, меня просто “вырубало”. В горле ком, мысли разбегаются, голос дрожит. Я начал отказываться от возможностей - только бы не выходить к людям. После работы с Дмитрием это звучит почт

🔥10👏73🥰2

31 May 2026, 14:52 UTC127 views25 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давно не выкладывал, исправляюсь. Продолжение моего рассказа. Пятая глава. (Первая, вторая, третья, четвертая главы) …… Я вспоминаю Катю. Или Лену. Ту, что плакала. Она была ближе всех к тому, чтобы прорваться. Мы прожили вместе почти год, и я в какой-то момент почти поверил, что это оно. Что можно. Что получается. Она любила готовить завтраки. Просыпалась раньше меня, жарила яичницу с беконом, резала помидоры,

8👏8🔥5💔3💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dima_pershin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 903,621 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дмитрий Першин | Речь лидера” (@dima_pershin), 260 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dima_pershin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.