Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Димагогия

@dimaOGOgia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,891subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001416453612
TypeChannel
Username@dimaOGOgia
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dimaOGOgia

Growth

1,8881,8911,889.56 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,891 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,888–1,891 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:241,891+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:311,889+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:271,888no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:471,888first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 1,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
450
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (13 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total2,249
Reactions total147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

454 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁13229.1%
🔥7616.7%
👍7516.5%
6614.5%
💯388.37%
🤣173.74%
👏102.20%
🥰102.20%
👎71.54%
🤔61.32%
👀51.10%
😭51.10%
😢30.661%
🤡20.441%
🙏10.22%
🤯10.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC316 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2) AI-2040 – безусловный базовый доход AI-2040 почти полностью о том, каким может быть позитивный сценарий развития. Там ожидается, что экономика будет довольно быстро расти одновременно с тем, что у людей будет появляться много благ. В такой системе 1) Нужны будут специфические скиллы, которым будет сложно обучаться 2) Большинству людей не надо будет работать, чтобы закрывать свои потребности 3) Благ будет настольк

😁7🔥53👍2💯1🙏1

23 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC522 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1) AI-2040 – таймлайны В новом эссе авторы решили поиграть с роадмапом. Новый прогноз развивается гораздо более спокойно. Так называемый takeoff date (год, когда фронтир лаборатории автоматизируют AI research и начнется самоулучшение моделей) перенеслось с 2027 на 2030 годы. Но это не значит, что прогресс замедлился! Просто ребята решили рассмотреть другой прогноз. Самый дерзкий прогноз takeoff year авторов приходи

👍64

23 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC581 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У меня был четырехчасовой перелет и я прочитал AI-2040 почти полностью Есть много мыслей, которыми я хочу поделиться. Но сначала стоит рассказать, о чем это вообще. ai-2040.com – развитие нашумевшего ai-2027.com. ai2027 я комментировал тут, он про довольно страшный (и реалистичный) сценарий выхода суперинтеллекта из под контроля. Если вы не читали, то решительно советую, было очень интересно погрузиться в почти sci

👍2319🔥15

21 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC371 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aimalyshevaPhoto

мой первый подкаст в роли фаундера! лайк/шер/репост, раз уж я теперь блогер 😄 вообще мне кажется что получилось правда интересно, так что если у вас есть 10 минут, то можно посмотреть на х2 если останутся вопросы, задавайте в комментах к посту, постараюсь ответить! отдельно очень приятно быть рядом с нобелевским лауреатом на страничке ютуба)) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzwCeqpl2mY @aimalysheva

10🔥7👏5

21 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC459 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Маленький каминг-аут Последние месяцы я работаю в новом стартапе, его делает Саша. Вчера мой друг Кирилл выпустил с ней подкаст, можете послушать замечательных людей! Что за стартап? Конечно же, AI stealth neolab, которая занимается фундаментальными LLM исследованиями. До недавнего времени это был настолько стелс режим, что мы даже о существовании компании особо не рассказывали. Сейчас мы все еще немного скрываемся

18🔥16👏5

13 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC653 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"В каких глупее?" Мне кажется, что ему, как и многим другим LLM не хватает мета-навыков. Когда надо держать в голове/памяти больше 6 критериев качества, Fable может иногда на это забивать. Этот навык у него примерно на уровне 16-летнего подростка, который придает инструкциям не очень большую значимость. Например, когда я пишу персонализированные outreach сообщения, у меня есть требование "Не задавать вопрос из яко

👍4

10 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC741 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мне нравится, что Fable 5 умнее меня в некоторых вещах

😁22

10 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC821 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интересно, что эпоха Reliable Agent в ai-2027 начинается в апреле 2026 и длится несколько месяцев до появления Superhuman Coder в начала 2027 года. В ai-2049 эта же стадия длится уже ~4 года, а более скромная стадия Automated Coder начинается спустя 4 года, в 2030 году. Это звучит гораздо более реалистично.

👍3👀2

10 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC783 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Опубликовали ai-2040.com Когда вышел AI-2027 я утонул в нем на 4 часа в самолете в Сингапур. Надеюсь, это будет не менее интересной фантастикой. (не подумайте, что я отрицаю AI прогресс. Просто обычно в таких прогнозах сроки сжаты раза в три)

😁6👍5🔥2👀1

8 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC619 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня день рождения у моей жены. Вот три урока о B2B продажах, которые я извлек из наших отношений…

😁25🔥11

8 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC628 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bulochka_insight

Привет! У меня сегодня день рождения и я прошу всех друзей и знакомых, у кого есть твиттер, репостнуть вот этот пост если можно, мне будет очень приятно 😄 https://x.com/avgaydashenko/status/2074898036958908575?s=46

👍10

1 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC854 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все-таки чтобы вайбкодить что-то вменяемое, надо иметь хорошие навыки и инженера, и продакта. Я чувствую, что для наколеночной автоматизации мне инженерных навыков хватает. А вот для более сложных систем – нет. Надеяться, что Opus 4.8 даст тебе эти недостающие компетенции, пока не стоит. А еще вы бы знали, как же сложно заставить LLMки писать текст на английском без AI слопа...

💯15🔥7🤔6😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dimaOGOgia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 221,160 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Димагогия” (@dimaOGOgia), 1,891 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimaOGOgia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.