INSTA AKTIV da siz sahifangizni professional darajada yurita olishingiz uchun barcha bilimlar beriladi ❤️👍 Marafon haqida batafsil bilish uchun adminga yozing ↘↘↘ @dilyamenejer @dilyamenejer @dilyamenejer

Channel
Dildora Raimjanova - REELS strateg
@dildoraraimjanova
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,275subscribers
-193 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002396949007 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dildoraraimjanova |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dildoraraimjanova |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 3,275 | -35 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 3,310 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 3,326 | -40 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 3,366 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:48 | 3,397 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 3,423 | -32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 3,455 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 3,460 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 3,468 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.29%
- avg views ÷ 3,275 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 108
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.28%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,615 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 23s
- Average length
- 1m 12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 20 | 40.8% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 24.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 24.5% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 8.16% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Телеграм канал очиш Нимана Керак деб у́йлардим ва каналларга кирсам комментарий ëзиладиган гурух деб у́йлардим бугун у́ргандим жуда хурсандман
Канвадан олдин Хам фойдаланардим лекин шунака ишлашни бугун у́ргандим албатта Бу учун сизларга Рахмат обложка алмаштирмадим Бир тухтамга келиб хаммасини у́згартириб чикаман.мен Энди кушилганим учун бугун улгуролмадим. Лекин дарслар кизикарли
Uyga vazifa Davilova Soliha Reelsga ablojka yasashni organdim Zor dars boldi nega 3mlnli kursda shularni orgatmadi hayronman
Nega "qimmat" desa ham mijozga chegirma qilib berish kerak emas? Audioda batafsil eshiting🛜 📱 Siz ham instagram to'g'ri yuritishni va sahifangizni yangi bosqichga olib chiqmoqchi bo'lsangiz INSTA AKTIV marafonida qatnashing! Marafon haqida batafsil bilish uchun adminga yozing ↘↘↘ @dilyamenejer @dilyamenejer @dilyamenejer
❤2🔥1🥰1
Mijoz "Qimmat!" desa, qanday to'g'ri javob berish kerak? 💙Tortishmang, rozi bo'ling. "Ha, bu arzon emas. Chunki natija beradi." O'zingizni oqlashni bas qilsangiz, mijoz ham urishishdan to'xtaydi. U sizdan oqlanish kutayotgan edi, siz esa ishonch ko'rsatdingiz. 💙Taqqoslang. "Nimaga solishtirganda qimmat?" Bu savol mijozning qayerdan xulosa chiqarayotganini bilishga va mahsulotning haqiqiy qiymatini ko'rsatishga yord…
❤1🔥1🥰1
Xayrli kun Mashxurlarim. 💌 Keling bugun xizmat yoki mahsulotingizni "Qimmat" degan mijozni yo'qotmaslik usullari haqida gaplashamiz Qiziqmi ❓
🥰3❤1👏1
📱 Agar siz ham instagram to'g'ri yuritishni va sahifangizni yangi bosqichga olib chiqmoqchi bo'lsangiz INSTA AKTIV marafonida qatnashing! Marafon haqida batafsil bilish uchun adminga yozing ↘↘↘ @dilyamenejer @dilyamenejer @dilyamenejer
❤1🔥1🥰1
Oooo bugungi dars man uchun ekaaaan🤩🤩🤩. Boshlaganimdan beri montajlaga 3, 4 soat vaqtim ketib qolayotgandi. Endi reja qvolaman
Assalomu alaykum yaxshimisiz. Ha koryapman, darslar zor hamma narsa tushuntirilgan. Dam olish kunlari vaqtim bulmadi endi vazifalarni tayyorlayman,xudo xolasa
Хамма дарслар тушунарли энди хаммасини кўриб конспект қилиб бўлдим
Рахмат жуда фойдали маълумотлар бердиз, манда кўп билимлар бориди, съёмка монтаж история рилс қилолардим лекин системага туширилмагагакан шуни по полочкам жойлаб анча аниқлик киритволдим, миямда обшяя картина пайдо бўлди ва қатда хато қивотганимни, қилишим керак бўлган ишларни қилмаётганимни тушуниб олдим. Бунга куратор назорати ва хар бир дарсни конспект қилиб чиққаним хам ёрдам берди. Энди хамма билимларимни қўлла…
❤1🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dildoraraimjanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dildora Raimjanova - REELS strateg” (@dildoraraimjanova), 3,275 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dildoraraimjanova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.