Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дибай

Channel

Дибай

@diiibae

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,332subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725821920
TypeChannel
Username@diiibae
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/diiibae

Growth

1,3311,3361,333.57 August 2026 — 1,336 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,336 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,331 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,332 subscribers1,3327 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,330–1,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:341,332+1
10 Aug 2026, 22:531,331-5
7 Aug 2026, 05:001,336no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:481,336first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 1,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
351
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (2 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,217
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536396519118264005710732.8%
💔6319.3%
custom 53143246034205690423510.7%
custom 53282605568203438933410.4%
custom 5235728913811909816298.90%
custom 5337165364054743818144.29%
custom 5258199744617921893133.99%
custom 5337282436273296750133.99%
custom 5204205597616011792103.07%
custom 522473709177408686851.53%
custom 534831289154197905630.92%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diiibae. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC138 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вторая половина дня была ну очень красивая Я ссусь кипятком буквально от неожиданного количества действительно классных мастеров приходящих в звезду. Часто в последнее время рассуждаю о предназначении студии, о том что люблю её и в первую очередь для меня она - моя душа, а не бизнес Наверное поэтому люди чувствуют и тянутся

custom 53639651911826400579custom 53282605568203438936custom 53143246034205690423

6 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC143 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня был странный день Было и есть из-за чего погрустить, порефлексировать, и облачиться в чернее черного, это первая половина дня

💔5custom 52357289138119098163custom 53143246034205690423

6 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC273 views35 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я в суете сори за игноры

custom 536396519118264005719custom 53372824362732967508custom 53143246034205690426custom 52042055976160117922

5 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC335 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Еще одну ветку добавили, но не до конца.. пациент себя плохо вел, перед сеансом не отдыхал не спал и было болезненно и невозможно продолжать дальше!!!!

custom 536396519118264005713custom 53371653640547438186custom 53143246034205690425

5 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC344 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Женя с малявками в гостях были щас 😋

custom 53639651911826400578custom 53143246034205690424custom 52581997446179218933custom 52042055976160117922

5 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC374 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчерашний сеанс комфортиков 🌺

custom 532826055682034389314custom 53639651911826400578custom 53143246034205690427

4 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC401 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ты, я, и тебе тут очень больно Делаем?

💔15custom 53639651911826400579custom 53282605568203438934custom 52357289138119098163

4 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC405 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Домаа 🤍

custom 536396519118264005720custom 53282605568203438939custom 53143246034205690427custom 52042055976160117921

3 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC435 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ой, я это вслух?

custom 523572891381190981610custom 53372824362732967505custom 53639651911826400575custom 52247370917740868681

3 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC452 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ох блять как же я хочу сорвать с себя нахуй всю одежду, зажечь кучу благовоний и в красном, приглушенном свете, под треск свечей, медленно танцевать под haus arafna Lucifer а потом заняться непристойностями

💔22custom 523572891381190981612custom 525819974461792189310custom 52247370917740868682

3 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC460 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Домой срочно Заебалась тут тратить деньги Но было прикольно! Особенно с любимами и на сеансе

💔15custom 53371653640547438188custom 52042055976160117924custom 53639651911826400573custom 52247370917740868681custom 52357289138119098161custom 53282605568203438931

2 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC457 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сладкие жопы Завтра уже обратно в дешевый СПб

custom 536396519118264005713💔6custom 53483128915419790563custom 52042055976160117921custom 52247370917740868681

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @diiibae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 304,199 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дибай” (@diiibae), 1,332 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diiibae.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.