Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Диджитальная

@digitalnya

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,454subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001156841870
TypeChannel
Username@digitalnya
Created9 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalnya

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@digitalproru/242214 May 2026, 15:19 UTC@digitalnya/2199 · this entry14 May 2026, 15:48 UTC1.0029 minutes
@digitalnya/2203 · this entry22 May 2026, 12:03 UTC@digitalproru/242522 May 2026, 12:20 UTC1.0017 minutes
@digitalproru/242626 May 2026, 13:34 UTC@digitalnya/2204 · this entry26 May 2026, 13:55 UTC1.0020 minutes
@digitalproru/242728 May 2026, 15:55 UTC@digitalnya/2205 · this entry28 May 2026, 16:03 UTC1.008 minutes
@digitalproru/24291 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC@digitalnya/2207 · this entry1 Jun 2026, 18:49 UTC1.0022 minutes
@digitalnya/2214 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC@digitalproru/243613 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC1.0035 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@digitalproru19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0029 minutesthis entry (136)
@prodigitalpro19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0036 minutesthis entry (145)
@marketingj12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutes@marketingj (120)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 23 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @prodigitalpro. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,45411,46511,459.57 August 2026 — 11,465 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,465 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,463 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,460 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,459 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,456 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,454 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,452–11,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:0611,454-2
11 Aug 2026, 18:5511,456-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:1311,459-1
9 Aug 2026, 13:1111,460-3
8 Aug 2026, 13:3811,463-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:4511,465no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:3711,465first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.343%
avg views ÷ 11,454 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (14 May 202612 August 2026)
Views total275
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026

способом — оформив прямую подписку на его профиль. Платформа Deezer сообщила, что сгенерированные треки уже составляют половину всех ежедневных загрузок на сервис. К наведению порядка подключаются и разработчики самих генераторов. На прошлой неделе сервис Suno объявил, что начнет маркировать свои композиции устойчивыми к вмешательству водяными знаками и ограничит их прямую выгрузку на стриминги, заверив, что это ник

12 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Spotify объявил войну бесконечному потоку сгенерированной музыки: платформа вводит плашки «AI Persona» и лишает нейро-артистов главного бесплатного источника прослушиваний — алгоритмических рекомендаций. С середины сентября сервис начнет массово маркировать профили, которые не представляют реального человека. Помечать себя музыканты смогут добровольно, но Spotify не намерен полагаться только на их честность. Платфор

3 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC48 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

LinkedIn принял эстафету в борьбе с AI-слопом. Теперь пользователи смогут помечать посты и комментарии, которые кажутся им сгенерированными или, как говорит сам LinkedIn, низкокачественными. Авторы смогут увидеть в дашборде, если пользователи слишком часто помечают их контент как ИИшный.

31 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC55 viewsread 12 August 2026

Apple встроит Maps в автомобили Ford Интеграция навигационного сервиса станет частью стратегии Apple по развитию рекламного бизнеса Apple и Ford объявили о стратегическом партнерстве: начиная с 2027 года Apple Maps станет встроенным навигационным сервисом новой платформы электромобилей Ford. В отличие от CarPlay, где карты работают через подключенный iPhone, Apple Maps будет интегрирован непосредственно в программн

30 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026

Google поддержала кодекс о маркировке ИИ-контента Google присоединился к Кодексу практики Евросоюза по прозрачности контента, созданного с помощью искусственного интеллекта. Документ является частью реализации европейского Закона об ИИ (AI Act) и предусматривает более четкое информирование пользователей о том, что изображения, видео, текст или аудио были созданы или изменены нейросетями. Для рекламной и медиаиндуст

29 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC38 viewsread 12 August 2026

Каждый десятый американец флиртует с чат-ботами Молодые пользователи чаще воспринимают искусственный интеллект как объект эмоциональной связи 11% американцев сообщили, что у них были интимные или романтические взаимодействия с ИИ-сервисами, включая ChatGPT, Claude и Google Gemini. Еще 12% признались, что разговоры с искусственным интеллектом вызывали у них возбуждение. Такие данные содержит опрос Talker Research.

17 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC62 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Рыжий ап возвращается? Компания «Вимм-Билль-Данн» подала заявку на повторную регистрацию этого товарного знака. Если ведомство её одобрит, то под брендом «Рыжий Ап» снова смогут выпускать такие продукты, как, например: йогурты, сырки, детское питание, лимонады и соки.

13 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC70 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

YouTube запустил ИИ-бота Ask YouTube, который превращает поиск в чат. Вместо списка роликов теперь можно задать вопрос обычным языком. Нейросеть соберет ответ на основе видео, покажет подходящие фрагменты, Shorts и предложит уточняющие запросы. Пока функция доступна только авторизованным пользователям в США, работает с англоязычными запросами и только в веб-версии YouTube.

10 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC65 viewsread 12 August 2026

Meta* грозит штраф в размере $1,4 трлн из-за алгоритмов, вызывающих у детей зависимость от соцсетей. По данным Reuters, иски к компании подали четыре штата США. В обвинении, в частности, говорится, что компания ставила прибыль выше безопасности детей и подпитывала кризис психического здоровья, затрагивающий целое поколение. Компания также могла вводить пользователей в заблуждение относительно безопасности Facebook

1 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC79 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Spotify начнет резервировать билеты на концерты для самых преданных фанатов Spotify запускает новую функцию Reserved by Spotify, которая позволит самым активным слушателям покупать билеты на концерты до старта общей продажи. Определять суперфанатов сервис будет по активности в приложении: количеству прослушиваний, репостов и другим действиям. При этом Spotify уточняет, что фоновое воспроизведение треков не даст пол

25 Jun 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Инстаграм объявили, что их приложение теперь доступно на Samsung Smart TV в США, Добавляют: каналы по интересам, сторис на большом экране, возможность отправлять Reels с телефона на телевизор и отдельное место для горизонтальных видео. Самая интересная часть: собираются тестировать длинные видео, лайвы и формат сериалов. *Meta, владеющая Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp признана в России экстремистской организацией и

19 Jun 2026, 12:17 UTC≈5,210 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Apple проиграла войну за App Store — в Бразилии официально разрешили альтернативные магазины приложений для айфонов. Пользователи уже могут установить AltStore и скачивать приложения в обход App Store, а также использовать сторонние платёжные системы.

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @digitalnya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 967,770 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Диджитальная” (@digitalnya), 11,454 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalnya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.