https://teletype.in/@digitalfinfree/7jX8i9QzOhV
👍12👏8❤7⚡1

Channel
@digitalfinfree
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
920subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001232981066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @digitalfinfree |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/digitalfinfree |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 920 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 920 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (10 February 2026 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 83 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
193 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 62 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 61 | 31.6% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 11.4% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 9.84% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 8.81% | |
| 🆒 | 9 | 4.66% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digitalfinfree. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://teletype.in/@digitalfinfree/7jX8i9QzOhV
👍12👏8❤7⚡1
🚀 Встречай KworkAlarm — твоего персонального помощника на Kwork! Хватит бесконечно обновлять страницу в поисках заказов. Теперь всё просто: 🤖 Бот сам находит новые проекты и присылает их в Telegram. Ты просто открываешь чат и видишь: название, бюджет, описание. И кнопка "Перейти к проекту" — чтобы сразу откликнуться. 💰 Это бесплатно. ⚡️ Это быстро. 🎯 Это твой шанс быть первым. Никакой лишней информации. Только св…
👍10❤8👏5👌4
https://vkvideo.ru/video-203673145_456239075 🔥 Agrebux - как это работает.
👍2❤1
🪙 Забудь про копейки на буксах! Устал сидеть на десятках буксов сутками, чтобы заработать 10 рублей? Тратишь часы на поиск нормальных, а попадаются только задания за «спасибо»? Мы решили эту проблему. Agrebux — платформа, которая меняет правила игры! 🔥 Почему Agrebux — это топ? 🎯 Только «жирные» задания — фильтр от 1₽ и выше. Никакой копеечной работы! 🛡 Ручная модерация — только проверенные и адекватные ТЗ. ⏳ Нон-…
❤15👍14👌8👏4🔥2
Привет! 🚀 Открыли новый проект по бесплатному обмену рефералами и ищем тестировщиков. Каждому участнику дадим по 500 монет на рекламу. Всего возьмём 10 человек. 💸 Как участвовать: Зарегистрируйтесь на refobmen.ru и в разделе «Купоны» активируйте код WRP88947 — 500 монет сразу упадут на счёт. После этого можно запускать рекламу и привлекать рефералов. 📈 Спасибо за помощь! Предложение ограничено! ✌️
❤15👍9🆒6👏5🔥3
🚀 Всем привет! Праздники закончились, пора браться за дело! 💪 Готовим наш Народный букс — сделал крутой гайд: как создать любой модуль с минимальным знанием кода. 🤖 Просто обучаешь нейросеть за 5 минут — и она: ✅ Генерирует модули сама. ✅ Ищет ошибки в готовых. ✅ Исправляет их на лету. Твой бесплатный программист в кармане! 📱 Модули можно продавать или делать на заказ за бабки 💰. Инструкция здесь ➡️ https://advb…
👍2❤1🆒1
Давно хотел перейти с хостинга на мощный виртуальный сервер, но боишься сложной настройки? 😰 Это не для тебя? Смотри: 🔥 Регистрируйся по рефке: firstvds.ru/?from=1177036 ✅ Промокод на скидку: 6481177036 Я всё сделаю за тебя! Установлю Debian 🚀 Добавлю удобную админ-панель Настрою веб-сервер, БД, SSL Результат: полноценный хостинг, но на мощном VDS! 💪 Цены от 280 ₽/мес — дешевле и круче чем все хостинги! 📩 Пиши м…
❤1
Обещанный мануал — получай рефералов БЕСПЛАТНО и НА АВТОМАТЕ! ✅ Тест: Вкинул 500 — вернул 50 в ПЕРВЫЙ день. Деньги остались и работают вечно! ✅ Секрет: Зарабатываем на жадности и лени. Создаёшь "невыполнимое" задание → рефы идут рекой → +3 руб за каждого ✅ Масштаб: Десятки платформ, 50–100 руб/день на автомате → вторая зарплата! Полный гайд внутри 👇 — скопируй, стартуй, богатей! https://telegra.ph/Bystro-nabrat-ref…
❤1👍1
🔥 Эй, команда! Деньги на рефералах — реальность! 💸 Помните партнёрку, о которой я говорил? Платит 3 руб за каждого АКТИВНОГО реферала — выплаты мгновенно, без гемора: https://t.me/FireMNbot?start=1319671114 Проблема: где брать активных рефов? Десятки в день? 😩 Мой метод меняет игру: 80+ активных рефов за 24ч с ОДНОГО объявления ⚡️ Работает на ПОЛНОМ АВТОМАТЕ — поставил и забыл 🤖 Масштаб: от 50 до 1000+ рефов/день 📈 …
🔥10❤3👍3⚡1
🔥 Заработай 5, 10 или даже 50₽ СЕГОДНЯ! Вывод в крипто или на любой кошелёк мгновенно! 🚀 Просто супер: 1️⃣ Регистрируйся по ссылке и хватай бонус: https://t.me/FireMNbot?start=1319671114 2️⃣ Выполни 5 заданий (подписки, запуск ботов) — по 1₽ за каждое! 💰 3️⃣ Иди в "Рефералы", жми "Поделиться ссылкой" и рассылай друзьям. Я уже вывел монету! А ты готов? 😎 Поделись и зарабатывай! 👍
❤1👍1
Создал 3 тестовых задания: Тестовое задание (автооплата через 48 часов) Ответ: любой Тестовое задание (проверка админом) Ответ: любой Тестовое задание (автооплата сразу) Ответ: 42 Первое задание, его не кто не проверяет, выплата приходит автоматом через 48 часов. Второе задание проверяется админом, выплата приходит после проверки. Третье с автооплатой. Достаточно ввести парильный ответ (42) и деньги моментально зач…
❤1👍1
Запустили модуль заданий для народного букса. Подробнее тут: https://t.me/advbux
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @digitalfinfree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 496,104 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Digital для заработка💰” (@digitalfinfree), 920 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalfinfree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.