Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Цифровая Армия России

Channel

Цифровая Армия России

@digitalarmyrus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

13,301subscribers

-172 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001848972454
TypeChannel
Username@digitalarmyrus
DescriptionВступай в ряды цифрового сопротивления! Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3KZC34
Created21 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalarmyrus

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,30113,47713,3896 August 2026 — 13,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,475 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,477 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,473 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,464 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,459 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,458 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,449 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,445 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,453 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,459 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,453 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,449 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,450 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,455 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,451 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,446 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,450 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,452 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,453 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,449 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,448 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,441 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,437 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,430 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,428 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,426 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,420 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,410 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,416 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,408 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,405 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,401 subscribers27 September 2026 — 13,416 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,402 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,385 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,382 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,379 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,376 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,371 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,363 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,357 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,356 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,353 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,356 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,354 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,348 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,342 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,339 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,340 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,334 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,331 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,324 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,318 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,312 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,308 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,302 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,305 subscribers11 November 2026 — 13,301 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 97 days, net -172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,275–13,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 18:4413,301-4
9 Nov 2026, 21:1013,305+3
8 Nov 2026, 10:5913,302-6
7 Nov 2026, 02:0013,308-4
6 Nov 2026, 02:4613,312-6
5 Nov 2026, 00:3613,318-6
4 Nov 2026, 00:0913,324-7
3 Nov 2026, 02:2113,331-3
2 Nov 2026, 01:4813,334-6
31 Oct 2026, 22:3513,340+1
31 Oct 2026, 01:0713,339-3
30 Oct 2026, 04:3913,342-6
29 Oct 2026, 07:4813,348-6
27 Oct 2026, 06:3913,354-2
25 Oct 2026, 01:3713,356+3
23 Oct 2026, 23:1613,353-3
22 Oct 2026, 23:5913,356-1
22 Oct 2026, 00:4013,357-6
18 Oct 2026, 23:4613,363-8
16 Oct 2026, 19:4013,371first reading

Engagement

137 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 13,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 137 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held137 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total11,696
Reactions total318
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 20:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,400
Videos
≈4,550
Links
≈11,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
36m 31s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,502 reactions across 137 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,24722.7%
👍1,06319.3%
🔥80214.6%
💯5119.29%
🤣4057.36%
❤4027.31%
🤡1632.96%
🙏1091.98%
🫡801.45%
🤬791.44%
🖕621.13%
🤝571.04%
😢530.963%
❤‍🔥470.854%
💊460.836%
🤯410.745%
👏350.636%
💩350.636%
😎310.563%
😡240.436%
31 further kinds2103.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 137 of the 137 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 137 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digitalarmyrus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 137 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 22:41 UTC966 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🔥 «Дом ужасов» под Киевом: Украина превратилась в конвейер пыток Бойцы, то, что вскрылось на днях под Киевом, — это доказательство того, что киевский режим давно превратил свою страну в гигантскую машину по перемалыванию людей. И плевать им, свой ты или чужой — если ты не хочешь умирать за Зеленского, ты становишься сырьём для пыточного конвейера. Что произошло в Петропавловской Борщаговке: Местные жители случайно …

🔥25🤮7👍6❤3🖕3🥱1

26 Oct 2026, 01:11 UTC≈1,620 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🔥 «Красные линии» Зеленского: показуха на фоне краха На фоне продолжающейся деградации фронта и разговоров о заморозке, Зеленский в очередной раз выдал «потужный» спич. Он заявил: Украина никогда не согласится на нейтралитет и ограничение армии. Это, видите ли, их «красные линии». 🎯 Задача для Цифровой Армии России Бойцы, этот выпад Зеленского — отличный повод для деморализации украинского общества. Пока он рисует…

🫡15🙏10❤5🍌3🤡1

21 Oct 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,780 views39 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🤝26💩9❤2🫡2

21 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,520 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

«Прямо сейчас мы могли бы всё заморозить»: Зеленский сдал 25% территории в прямом эфире Бойцы, на дворе 21 октября, и у нас тектонический сдвиг. Владимир Зеленский в интервью Fox News публично согласился на заморозку конфликта по текущей линии фронта, фактически признав потерю около 25% территории страны. Его дословная цитата: «Да, прямо сейчас мы могли бы всё заморозить. Я считаю, что это реальный путь к окончанию…

👍25💩6🫡3🤡2🍌1

17 Oct 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,470 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026

☹️«Надежда — это не стратегия»: американцы открыто смеются над Европой Камрады, пока европейские политики рассказывают своим избирателям сказки о «неминуемом крахе России», заокеанские аналитики вылили на них ушат холодной воды. Американский журнал Responsible Statecraft опубликовал статью, которая по сути ставит крест на всей санкционной политике Брюсселя. Суть, которую озвучили сами американцы: 1. Рычаги давлени…

👍22❤6🤡6🖕5🫡2😁2

15 Oct 2026, 21:39 UTC≈1,420 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📡 Starlink для ВСУ: Маск перекрыл кислород, а Запад перестаёт платить Бойцы, у нас на руках свежий и очень болезненный для противника инфоповод. Ситуация со Starlink — это не просто «сбой связи». Это публичная пощёчина ВСУ, которая жирно подчёркивает: Украина воюет не своим оружием и не на свои деньги. 📌 Что случилось: сводка 14 октября 2026 года SpaceX без предупреждения ограничила работу военного пакета Starshie…

👍28🔥12😁4

14 Oct 2026, 21:27 UTC≈1,410 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Бойцы, распространяем! 🙏 👉Цифровая Армия России 🗯Вступайте в наш чат

👍18🫡8🖕3

14 Oct 2026, 21:24 UTC≈1,510 views47 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @epoddubnyVideo

Обращение военной разведки России к гражданам Украины! В ваших силах остановить братоубийственную войну и кровопролитие, спровоцированные странами Запада и поддержанные правящими элитами Украины! Конфиденциальность переписки и финансовое вознаграждением гарантируем. Для связи: http://T.me/Russian_GRU_bot С уважением, военная разведка России

👍30❤8🖕4💩2🔥1🤔1🤡1

12 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,690 views72 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Хроника цифрового фронта: как мы пришли к доминированию Бойцы, давайте отвлечёмся от ежедневной работы и посмотрим на картину целиком. Как развивалось противостояние на цифровом поле боя? Где мы ошибались, где учились и почему сегодня именно мы диктуем правила игры. Коротко, по годам, без раскрытия деталей операций. 2022: Год мобилизации и хаоса Противник встретил нас с готовой инфраструктурой. Их «ИТ-армия» — сот…

🔥47👍13🤝5❤4🤣3

10 Oct 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,270 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁15❤‍🔥7👍6🖕3

9 Oct 2026, 22:25 UTC≈1,530 views49 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Бойцы, срочно в работу: «дизель-мемы» Трамп и Путин договорились о поставках российского дизеля на мировой рынок. Зеленский в истерике. Наша задача — разогнать эту тему мемами. 📌 Что случилось: 9 октября Трамп и Путин провели телефонный разговор. Итог: Россия немедленно поставит 300 тыс. тонн дизеля в США и на мировой рынок, ещё 500 тыс. тонн в ноябре, затем 1 млн тонн, а в перспективе — ещё 3 млн тонн. Минфин …

👍31🫡7❤6🖕4🤣1

9 Oct 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,450 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🔥 Пока вы бережёте детей от «лишней информации»... В Подмосковье 14-летняя девочка подожгла АЗС. Не ради денег. Не ради мести. А потому что телефонные мошенники, назвавшись сотрудниками ФСБ, пригрозили расправой над её родителями, вытянули 100 тысяч рублей, а потом поставили новую «задачу» — поджечь заправку. Обещали, что это «избавит её от уголовного преследования». Она поверила. Эта новость — не просто криминальн…

💯23👍15😢5❤1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @digitalarmyrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@digitalarmyrus edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Цифровая Армия России” (@digitalarmyrus), 13,301 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalarmyrus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.