📍 جذب فالوور اینستاگرام به ۱۶ روش کاملا عملی✔️ ➖ تو این ویدیو بهتون یاد میدم که چطور به ۱۶ روش کاملا عملی بتونین فالوورهای هدفمند در اینستاگرام جذب کنید🔥❤️ 👈 آموزش افزایش فالوور در اینستاگرام👇 https://youtu.be/oWCMBsNieqI ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
🤡1

Channel
@digipacks
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,942subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001213117684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @digipacks |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 17 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/digipacks |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @zangedanesh/1773222 May 2021, 13:45 UTC | @digipacks/2812 · this entry22 May 2021, 13:46 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @zangedanesh/1778629 May 2021, 15:02 UTC | @digipacks/2814 · this entry29 May 2021, 15:03 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @zangedanesh/191576 Feb 2022, 09:35 UTC | @digipacks/2823 · this entry6 Feb 2022, 09:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @zangedanesh/201798 Nov 2022, 08:22 UTC | @digipacks/2828 · this entry8 Nov 2022, 08:51 UTC | 1.00 | 30 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @zangedanesh | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.0 hours | @zangedanesh (9–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 17 May 2021 to 26 March 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 2,942 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 2,944 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 2,948 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 2,948 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2021 to 26 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📍 جذب فالوور اینستاگرام به ۱۶ روش کاملا عملی✔️ ➖ تو این ویدیو بهتون یاد میدم که چطور به ۱۶ روش کاملا عملی بتونین فالوورهای هدفمند در اینستاگرام جذب کنید🔥❤️ 👈 آموزش افزایش فالوور در اینستاگرام👇 https://youtu.be/oWCMBsNieqI ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
🤡1
💢 بازدید پست و استوری اینستاگرامت پایین اومده؟ ✅ تو این ویدیو بهت آموزش میدم خودت پیجت رو آنالیز کنی. و دلیل کاهش بازدید رو متوجه بشی و راه چارشم در ویدیو گفتم. فقط کافیه این ویدیو رو کامل ببینی. https://youtu.be/S2_axTjv1xU ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
👍1
👨💻 آموزش جامع اینشات - قسمت اول - پاسخ به ۱۴ سوال پرتکرار 👈 تو این ویدیو کاملا راه میوفتی که با اینشات ویدیوهای اینستاگرام و یوتیوبت رو ادیت کنی هر سوالی هم داشتی میتونی بپرسی. ➖آموزش جامع اینشات👇 https://youtu.be/VCinhY12idM ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
👨💻 آموزش جامع اینشات - قسمت دوم - پاسخ به ۱۲ سوال پرتکرار 👈 بعد از اینکه در قسمت اول کامل اینشات رو آموزش دادم که بتونی برای ادیت عکس و ویدیو با اینشات راه بیوفتی، در قسمت دوم مواردی رو بهت میگ😍م که بتونی در ادیت با اینشات حرفهای بشی ➖آموزش جامع اینشات👇 https://youtu.be/dhzdqBRtO9o ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
👍1
❤️ کادوی ولنتاین ما امسال آموزشیه 😘 ➖آموزش رایگان سه اپلیکیشن کاربردی گوشی ( اینشات | پیکسارت | کپ کات ) 🔽 آموزش جامع اینشات👇 https://youtu.be/VCinhY12idM 🔽 آموزش جامع کپ کات👇 https://youtu.be/1mTq_LZot0E 🔽 آموزش جامع پیکس آرت👇 https://youtu.be/l7BnaFQPzaE ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
🕊 آموزش حرفهای تلگرام در دو قسمت 👈 اگر قصد ایجاد کانال تو تلگرام داری و یا کانال داری و میخوای کسب درآمد کنی. حتما این سری رایگان آموزش تلگرام رو دنبال کنید. 🔽 آموزش حرفهای تلگرام - قسمت اول https://youtu.be/VA45a6Tu5Mg 🔽 آموزش حرفهای تلگرام - قسمت دوم https://youtu.be/bGIWzDU7kG0 ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
❤1
📍 ایده برای تولید محتوا از کجا بیاریم؟ ( 7 راه تضمینی ) ➖ تو این ویدیو هفت روش کاملا کاربردی بهت پیشنهاد میدیم که قطعا بتونی ایده جذاب و خلاقانه برای ویدیوهات پیدا کنی. 👈 ایده تولید محتوا از کجا بیاریم؟👇 https://youtu.be/a-sl894tDMc ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
#خبر امروز با کد تخفیف PRTQL ( با حروف بزرگ ) میتونید تخفیف بیشتر از سایت بگیرید ( بیشتر از ۹۵ درصدی که برای کاربران عادی وجود داره ) اول دوره هاتون رو به سبد خرید اضافه کنید و بعد از کد PRTQL استفاده کنید #فقط_۲۰_نفر میتونن استفاده کنن (هرکی زودتر بزنه برندس) https://porteqali.com/ZD
❤1
🎞 آموزش حرفهای تلگرام - قسمت دوم 👈 اگر قصد ایجاد کانال تو تلگرام داری و یا کانال داری و میخوای کسب درآمد کنی. حتما این سری رایگان آموزش تلگرام رو دنبال کنید. 🔽 آموزش حرفهای تلگرام - قسمت دوم https://youtu.be/bGIWzDU7kG0 ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
👍1
🎞 آموزش حرفهای تلگرام - قسمت اول 👈 اگر قصد ایجاد کانال تو تلگرام داری و یا کانال داری و میخوای کسب درآمد کنی. حتما این سری رایگان آموزش تلگرام رو دنبال کنید. 🔽 آموزش حرفهای تلگرام - قسمت اول https://youtu.be/VA45a6Tu5Mg ➖➖➖➖➖ 🆔: @Zangedanesh
🎞 آموزش جامع طراحی سایت، تولید محتوا و سئوی وبسایت ١- آموزش کامل طراحی سایت با وردپرس ( خبری، فروشگاهی، آموزشی) ٢- آموزش تولید محتوا برای وبسایت ٣- سئوی وبسایت 👈 داشتن کامپیوتر یا لپ تاپ الزامیست. 📞 با پشتیبانی روزانه 👈 ثبت نام فقط از طریق آیدی که در زیر گذاشتم 👇👇 📱: @AmiirSaleh
[صفحه کیلید!] ⌨️ قسمت سه: ساخت ربات اینستاگرام با پایتون 🤖 توی این قسمت با هم یه ربات اینستاگرامی میسازیم 👇 👉 https://youtu.be/3QU-vJGJKTk این ویدیو رو لایک کن و توی کانال سابسکرایب کن تا آموزشهای خفنتر رو از دست ندی..❤️ #video #youtube #safhekilid #mrrobat ➖➖➖➖ 🆔 @LearnPY
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @digipacks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,106,853 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش تخصصی کامپیوتر” (@digipacks), 2,942 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digipacks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.