Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for dicey label

Channel

dicey label

@diceylabel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002728258279
TypeChannel
Username@diceylabel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 17 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/diceylabel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2527267 August 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26 subscribers10 October 2026 — 25 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 63 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 00:0225-1
22 Aug 2026, 04:3726-1
11 Aug 2026, 07:3027no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:4127first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5289603634953220335421.1%
👀421.1%
custom 5364112714719326968315.8%
custom 5436355542106784716210.5%
💘210.5%
😈210.5%
🦄210.5%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 11 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Dec 2025, 20:09 UTC66 viewsread 11 August 2026

ну хз, могу обратно открыть ее, но мне кажется актива не будет

11 Dec 2025, 20:07 UTC70 viewsread 11 August 2026

я надеюсь когда нибудь нам перестанут писать в бот думая что компания открыта..

23 Aug 2025, 18:49 UTC206 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

закрывать компанию?

  1. да22%
  2. нет59%
  3. хз, мне все равно19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Aug 2025, 18:48 UTC190 viewsread 11 August 2026

честно я не вижу смысла вести эту компанию. актива совсем нету ни в тг, ни в тт, заявок почти нет. думаю я закрою компанию.

23 Aug 2025, 13:46 UTC146 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @YESORstPhoto

Антипиар на BLISS ENT 🤩 Прошу обратить на это внимание и распространить, все доки, голосовые и сообщения будут прикреплены в комм. ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Совладелец компании делала рассылки по пиар чатам, что они в поисках участниц в прототип эспа. Я подала. Меня приняли. Уже в чате та самая совладелец начала записывать тонну гс о том, что ей подала заявку на Карину девочка с очень хорошими навыками, но она была «токсичной» (хотя…

18 Aug 2025, 11:42 UTC133 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ПРØСЛУШUBAHŪE B UTЗU \\ # XD DÍCEY LABEL — SÉXY LABEL [🍭] АНКЕТА В КОММЕНТАРИЯХ F͇REE — OT5 ) ( BUSY — .... / # sexy DO YOU LIKE A CANDY??? // yummy OÙR BOT - @diceylblBOT # candy

custom 53641127147193269682

17 Aug 2025, 18:16 UTC132 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

до 20 голосов

custom 54363555421067847161

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @diceylabel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2025, 18:49 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

закрывать компанию?

  1. да22%
  2. нет59%
  3. хз, мне все равно19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2025, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

ˋˋ — AÙЛUТ ØR UTЗU ? 🍭

  1. aùлuт43%
  2. uтзu43%
  3. кнопка влд14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 11 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dicey label” (@diceylabel), 25 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diceylabel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.