Channel
@dianjignsaishi
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,109subscribers
-494 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002047812283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dianjignsaishi |
| Description | 导航群✅： @jiudiandh 📲商务合作： @peking10 ☎️ 爆料投稿： @TG_DF6 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dianjignsaishi |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @jdcmmrtd/394477 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC | @dianjignsaishi/21854 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jdcmmrtd/394487 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC | @dianjignsaishi/21853 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jdcmmrtd/394527 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC | @dianjignsaishi/21858 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jdcmmrtd/394537 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC | @dianjignsaishi/21859 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jdcmmrtd/394557 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC | @dianjignsaishi/21861 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jdcmmrtd/394597 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC | @dianjignsaishi/21865 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @jdcmmrtd | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @jdcmmrtd (18–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 18 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @jdcmmrtd. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
1.3 average views per post against 9,109 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.014%. Across the 2,477 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 2.50% and 17.8%, with a median of 7.78%.
| Window | 30 days (19 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 144 of 144 published in the window (144 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 187 |
| Mature posts only | 0.014% over 46 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 9,109 measured 17 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:zho · 2,477 channels · p10 0.731% · p25 2.50% · p50 7.78% · p75 17.8% · p90 36.0% |
| Position in cohort | 0.040th percentile · 1/500 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.032% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · err_low, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 9,109 | -144 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 9,253 | -176 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 9,429 | -146 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 9,575 | -28 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 9,603 | first reading |
144 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 144 (7 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 187 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
😃😄😄😃 😄😁😁😁😁😄😄😄😄 新币体育·重新定义信誉博彩 上亿资金储备·大额无忧 😃新币体育首存嘉奖最高送3888U 😀最高2.2%好有投注佣金，日结无上限！！ 😃体育连赢8场畅享1888USDT 😀串关好礼·新币助力，最高彩金8888USDT 😃体育投注·失利加赠 😀电子&捕鱼亏损助您扭转乾坤 😃VIP专属晋级礼金，月礼金！ 😀VIP高额返水，体育最高返水1.5% 😃真人视讯·战绩长虹最高888USDT 😃😀百家乐8输9绝杀，最高可得5888转运金！ 😃😃新币体育代理招商纯拥模式 💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸 ➡➡TG小程序：一键登录！方便快捷！免实名零等待！ ➡➡TG官方投注入口：xb.vip ☺😌😙😚 😄😁😆😁🔣 @xbty999 😄😄😁😁🔣 @xinbivipqun
#LCK 韩国冠军联赛 - 第3-4回合 DNS.C 对战 NS.A（ BO3) 第二局独赢：NS.A 击杀让分： NS.+3.5 击杀人头：大于34.5 比赛时间：小于34 ⭐️点击进入游戏🌟 👉官方交流群，进群不定时发放红包，海量红包等你来抢！ 👉首充100U赠送38U ------------------------------------- 官方频道： @zzylvvip 官方群组： @vip_zzyl 游戏链接： @zzyl_bot 官方客服： @ZZYLvipbot ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 【中文导航站】 【全球新闻】 【反差偷拍】 【二手交易平台】 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 广告招商 ✅ 投稿爆料 ✅
#KeSPA 杯 - 淘汰赛 NS 对战 DNS（ BO5) 第一局独赢：NS 击杀人头：小于37.5 比赛时间：大于30 第一滴血：NS ⭐️点击进入游戏🌟 👉官方交流群，进群不定时发放红包，海量红包等你来抢！ 👉首充100U赠送38U ------------------------------------- 官方频道： @zzylvvip 官方群组： @vip_zzyl 游戏链接： @zzyl_bot 官方客服： @ZZYLvipbot ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 【中文导航站】 【全球新闻】 【反差偷拍】 【二手交易平台】 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 广告招商 ✅ 投稿爆料 ✅
[导航]() [管理]() #频道 #链接 体育推单⚽️ 3 电竞推单🎮 中文曝光🚨 体育直播交流⛳️ 反差吃瓜🍉 1z ⭐️点击进入游戏🌟 👉官方交流群，进群不定时发放红包，海量红包等你来抢！ 👉首充100U赠送38U ------------------------------------- 官方频道： @zzylvvip 官方群组： @vip_zzyl 游戏链接： @zzyl_bot 官方客服： @ZZYLvipbot ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 【中文导航站】 【全球新闻】 【反差偷拍】 【二手交易平台】 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 广告招商 ✅ 投稿爆料 ✅
#LCK 韩国冠军联赛 - 第3-4回合 DNS.C 对战 NS.A（ BO3) 第一局独赢：NS.A 击杀让分： NS.A+3.5 击杀人头：小33.5 比赛时间：大于32 ⭐️点击进入游戏🌟 👉官方交流群，进群不定时发放红包，海量红包等你来抢！ 👉首充100U赠送38U ------------------------------------- 官方频道： @zzylvvip 官方群组： @vip_zzyl 游戏链接： @zzyl_bot 官方客服： @ZZYLvipbot ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 【中文导航站】 【全球新闻】 【反差偷拍】 【二手交易平台】 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 广告招商 ✅ 投稿爆料 ✅
✨👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍✨ 📱📱 📱📱 📱📱 📱📱 📱📱 实体与线上联运|安全稳定|大额无忧 ✔️全网首个小程序与网页综合运营盘 1️⃣ 首存100U送18U，最高领2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤 2️⃣ 新人二存再送2%，最高领5️⃣🔤🔤 3️⃣ 每日闯奖励 🥰 最高领 1️⃣6️⃣5️⃣🔤 4️⃣ 500万💲 派奖钱包可查大额首选 5️⃣ 每日首存领彩金，最高领取 8️⃣8️⃣🔤 6️⃣ 每周流水奖励，最高领取 1️⃣2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤 7️⃣ 会员最高返水1️⃣🔤2️⃣🔤,代理返水0️⃣🔤6️⃣🔤，可无限代，负盈利最高返佣 5️⃣0️⃣🔤 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 📱会员游戏无需实名，全程USDT结算。保障会员信息安全！
😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒 😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞 😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞 ✔️支持实体与线上联合运营，确保安全稳定，大额交易无忧。 😞首充100U送😞😞😞，最高送😞😞😞😞 😞电子游戏爆奖，高爆率爆奖，😞😞😞😞等你来拿 😞每日首充，最高赠送😞😞😞😞 😞复存送大礼，最高😞😞😞😞 😞每日翻盘金，😞😞😞😞😞高额礼金，祝你绝地翻盘 😞会员最高返水😞.😞😞%，代理返佣😞.😞%可无线代，负盈利最高返佣😞😞% 😞加入官方交流群，每天发言领奖励 😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞 会员游戏无需实名，全程USDT结算。保障会员信息安全！ 😒😒：点击进入游戏（无需注册）
😃😄😄😃 😄😁😁😁😁😄😄😄😄 新币体育·重新定义信誉博彩 上亿资金储备·大额无忧 😃新币体育首存嘉奖最高送3888U 😀最高2.2%好有投注佣金，日结无上限！！ 😃体育连赢8场畅享1888USDT 😀串关好礼·新币助力，最高彩金8888USDT 😃体育投注·失利加赠 😀电子&捕鱼亏损助您扭转乾坤 😃VIP专属晋级礼金，月礼金！ 😀VIP高额返水，体育最高返水1.5% 😃真人视讯·战绩长虹最高888USDT 😃😀百家乐8输9绝杀，最高可得5888转运金！ 😃😃新币体育代理招商纯拥模式 💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸 ➡➡TG小程序：一键登录！方便快捷！免实名零等待！ ➡➡TG官方投注入口：xb.vip ☺😌😙😚 😄😁😆😁🔣 @xbty999 😄😄😁😁🔣 @xinbivipqun
[导航]() [管理]() #频道 #链接 体育推单⚽️ 3 电竞推单🎮 中文曝光🚨 体育直播交流⛳️ 反差吃瓜🍉 1z ⭐️点击进入游戏🌟 👉官方交流群，进群不定时发放红包，海量红包等你来抢！ 👉首充100U赠送38U ------------------------------------- 官方频道： @zzylvvip 官方群组： @vip_zzyl 游戏链接： @zzyl_bot 官方客服： @ZZYLvipbot ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 【中文导航站】 【全球新闻】 【反差偷拍】 【二手交易平台】 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 广告招商 ✅ 投稿爆料 ✅
✨👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍✨ 📱📱 📱📱 📱📱 📱📱 📱📱 实体与线上联运|安全稳定|大额无忧 ✔️全网首个小程序与网页综合运营盘 1️⃣ 首存100U送18U，最高领2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤 2️⃣ 新人二存再送2%，最高领5️⃣🔤🔤 3️⃣ 每日闯奖励 🥰 最高领 1️⃣6️⃣5️⃣🔤 4️⃣ 500万💲 派奖钱包可查大额首选 5️⃣ 每日首存领彩金，最高领取 8️⃣8️⃣🔤 6️⃣ 每周流水奖励，最高领取 1️⃣2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤 7️⃣ 会员最高返水1️⃣🔤2️⃣🔤,代理返水0️⃣🔤6️⃣🔤，可无限代，负盈利最高返佣 5️⃣0️⃣🔤 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 📱会员游戏无需实名，全程USDT结算。保障会员信息安全！
😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒 😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞 😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞 ✔️支持实体与线上联合运营，确保安全稳定，大额交易无忧。 😞首充100U送😞😞😞，最高送😞😞😞😞 😞电子游戏爆奖，高爆率爆奖，😞😞😞😞等你来拿 😞每日首充，最高赠送😞😞😞😞 😞复存送大礼，最高😞😞😞😞 😞每日翻盘金，😞😞😞😞😞高额礼金，祝你绝地翻盘 😞会员最高返水😞.😞😞%，代理返佣😞.😞%可无线代，负盈利最高返佣😞😞% 😞加入官方交流群，每天发言领奖励 😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞 会员游戏无需实名，全程USDT结算。保障会员信息安全！ 😒😒：点击进入游戏（无需注册）
#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段 TES 对战 EDG（BO3) 第一局独赢：TES 击杀让分：TES-8.5 击杀人头：大30.5 比赛时间：大于30 第一滴血：EDG ⭐️点击进入游戏🌟 👉官方交流群，进群不定时发放红包，海量红包等你来抢！ 👉首充100U赠送38U ------------------------------------- 官方频道： @zzylvvip 官方群组： @vip_zzyl 游戏链接： @zzyl_bot 官方客服： @ZZYLvipbot ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 【中文导航站】 【全球新闻】 【反差偷拍】 【二手交易平台】 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 广告招商 ✅ 投稿爆料 ✅
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @dianjignsaishi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,197,112 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“电竞赛事-电竞推单【转转娱乐赞助】” (@dianjignsaishi), 9,109 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dianjignsaishi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.