Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

dianalista

@dianalyse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,260subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403429272
TypeChannel
Username@dianalyse
Created11 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dianalyse

Growth

2,2592,2602,259.56 August 2026 — 2,259 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,259 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,260 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,259–2,260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:362,260+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:192,259no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:402,259first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 18 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 19s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

550 reactions across 11 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥20236.7%
10318.7%
💯5910.7%
🔥437.82%
😍407.27%
👍173.09%
😁162.91%
🤔142.55%
122.18%
🤓71.27%
🆒61.09%
👏61.09%
🥰50.909%
40.727%
🤯30.545%
🙏20.364%
🤩20.364%
🏆10.182%
👀10.182%
👻10.182%
6 further kinds61.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 550reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dianalyse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 January 2026 to 10 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2026, 20:56 UTC429 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhizoanalysis

КАК СПРАВЛЯТЬСЯ С АБСУРДНОСТЬЮ ЖИЗНИ? На досуге изучала Довлатова и подумала, что его подход к этому вопросу может быть кому-то актуален. Решила поделиться находкой, поскольку часто сталкиваюсь с вопросами: «да как такое может быть», «что же делать» и прочие. Человек, написавший «Зону» (записки надзирателя) видел, как низко может пасть человек, и как высоко он способен парить. Он видел и проживал ужасный мир, жизнь

22❤‍🔥8💯32🔥2🤓1🦄1

10 Jun 2026, 13:48 UTC450 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#minutodehumor@dianalyse

😁164❤‍🔥1👻1🔥1🤓1🤣1

28 Apr 2026, 07:35 UTC747 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @psycaminoPhoto

В Instagram много отклика собирают посты в духе: «Как хорошо, что наше поколение больше не осуждает Саманту, а осуждает Керри». Давайте поразмыслим… Что значит быть Керри? Это про нуждаемость в другом, про зависимость от отношений, про трудность завершить связь, даже если в ней больно. А что значит быть Самантой? Это значит быть независимой, ни к кому не привязываться, заявлять о своих сексуальных желаниях и не бо

45❤‍🔥15💯10🔥3👏1🙏1

20 Mar 2026, 09:14 UTCviews —

dianalista pinned «​​ЗАПИСАТЬСЯ НА ПРИЕМ (запросы с которыми работаю и профессиональный путь) Веду этот блог с 2020 года и ни разу не писала о себе и своем профессиональном пути. Пишу это сейчас, чтобы сделать закрепленный пост. Моя профессиональная дорога начинается в медицине…»

19 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC783 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

продолжаем предыдущую тему: ⠀ Современная эпоха — это эпоха переизбытка импульсов, внешних раздражений, новостей, контента в соцсетях и рекламных баннеров. Этот переизбыток существенно меняет структуру экономики нашего внимания, умения фокусироваться и воспринимать входящие потоки регулярных гипер-импульсов. ⠀ Современный субъект — это многозадачная машина. Откройте на досуге поисковик работ и обратите внимание на са

❤‍🔥23💯1275🙏1

15 Mar 2026, 11:21 UTCviews —

dianalista pinned «​​ВЫСТАВКА «ПОЛИРИТМИЯ» Рада вам, наконец, презентовать социальный некоммерческий проект, который мы реализуем с коллегами последние три месяца! Приглашаем вас на открытие выставки «Полиритмия», которое состоится 10 мая в 16:00 в пространстве «Нормальное…»

11 Mar 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,030 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​​Мы начали говорить о современности в оптике психоаналитической мысли в этом тексте, сегодня продолжим небольшим дополнениями, попутно вспоминая Фуко с опорой на концепцию общества усталости (Бен-Чхоль Хан, современный немецкий философ корейского происхождения). ⠀ Фуко писал в XX веке («Психическая болезнь и личность», «История безумия в классическую эпоху», «Слова и вещи», «Археология знания», «Надзирать и наказыва

❤‍🔥22💯13🔥5👍32🆒1

15 Feb 2026, 14:05 UTC888 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В продолжение предыдущего текста, ещё одна клиническая зарисовка: Безумная любовь, эротомания: Эротомания — это «зеркальный» бред, где пациент убежден: «Другой меня любит». В отличие от невротической влюбленности, где всегда есть место сомнению «а любит ли меня другой, а ценен ли я для него?», в паранойе никаких сомнений нет. Пациент тотально уверен — «это не я желаю Другого, это Другой (часто статусный, недосягае

❤‍🔥23👍7🔥632👏2🤝1

14 Feb 2026, 15:58 UTC645 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По следам недавней конференции, где я выступала с докладом о депрессии, оставлю здесь небольшой психиатрический ликбез об одном из феноменов: Бред Котара (Нигилистический бред): Крайняя точка меланхолии. Пациент утверждает, что у него нет органов, он бессмертен в своем гниении. Другое название — синдром «ходячего трупа» — редкое, тяжелое психическое расстройство, при котором пациент убежден, что он умер, разлагается

❤‍🔥18🔥62👍2

11 Feb 2026, 16:17 UTC711 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔺суббота — сноуборд и лес 🔺воскресенье — коньки и лес 🔺понедельник — пациенты и выступление тут с темой «Женская психопатия» 🔺вторник — пациенты 🔺среда — лес и выступление тут с темой «Психотическая депрессия: клиника шизофрении, паранойи, меланхолии и ординарного психоза» такова жизнь!

❤‍🔥22🔥104💯3🤩1😎1🆒1

4 Feb 2026, 14:07 UTC908 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Современная культура, о которой мы вскользь упомянули в этом тексте, задает новые координаты для функционирования человеческого существа. Особенно бросается в глаза феномен «нарциссизма» жертвы. В аналитической оптике часть подобных эпизодов выглядит как попытка сделать из своей травмы социальный капитал и новое означающее. Соцсети радикально меняют отношения субъекта со своим страданием: 1. Травма как новое Имя, к

❤‍🔥28💯14🔥96👍5👏3🤔3🤯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dianalyse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 497,368 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dianalista” (@dianalyse), 2,260 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dianalyse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.