Channel
@diamosourcing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,937subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003582417050 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diamosourcing |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diamosourcing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 7,937 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 7,934 | +28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 7,906 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 7,900 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (27 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,486 |
| Reactions total | 105 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 74.3% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 7.62% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New sneakers just arrived from our factory for testing 🔥 👟 LV Trainers and Nike Kobe 6 Protro Kay Yow — some of the best versions currently available on the market, now in a rare US 13 size (EU 47.5). Last week we received a lot of new orders from you guys — thank you for the trust! 🙏 If you’re looking for any specific pair, feel free to join @diamokicks and send us a request. There’s a good chance we already have…
❤6🔥5
China is full of interesting and unexpected places 🇨🇳 Like this cozy corner in Foshan, created by foreigners who wanted to bring a piece of their culture to China. Right next to 🏨 Oakwood Premier Foshan, they opened a small street-style food area with European and Slavic cuisine, a terrace, and occasional open-air DJ sets. 🍝🎶 If you have an idea and know how to bring it to life — why not create something for your …
❤10🔥2👍1
🔥 Bringing back the trend updates! Sharing more fresh finds from our favorite suppliers — the latest trending items, new drops, and products we’ve been testing and sending recently. ✈️ The quality keeps surprising me. The more suppliers I visit and test, the more I see how quickly they adapt to new trends and produce top-level items. 🇨🇳 All supplier contacts and detailed product reviews are already available insid…
❤8🔥4
I can give you a cheaper price. Probably the most common phrase you’ll hear when sourcing in China. 💰 And honestly, it’s exactly what everyone wants to hear. But is getting the lowest price really the most important thing? I’ve heard it countless times: “I’m sure you have great suppliers, but we’ll definitely give you a cheaper price.” The truth is, finding a cheap supplier in 🇨🇳China isn’t difficult. Finding …
❤8💯2🙏1
5 facts about Putian 🇨🇳👟 China’s footwear capital 1️⃣ Most sellers in Guangzhou and other Chinese markets are just resellers. They source their shoes from Putian. 2️⃣ Many people claiming they “own a factory” in Putian are actually resellers too. They simply post products from other manufacturers. 3️⃣ Most bloggers only show warehouses, markets, and showrooms where filming is allowed. The products there are usuall…
❤8🔥2👍1
Two days in 🌴Xiamen—one of the most relaxed cities in China, with incredible architecture and a European vibe. 🇨🇳🌊 Now it’s time to pack up, check out, and head to the next stop: Putian. 👟 📍The footwear capital of China. I’ll visit my partner’s factory to inspect product quality, discuss new orders, and, of course, take you behind the scenes of sneaker production—just like I promised. Fresh updates are coming ver…
❤12🔥1
Who actually makes your sneakers? 👀 This is what footwear development really looks like. 🇨🇳 Before a single pair goes into mass production, every detail is tested: materials, shapes, molds, stitching, comfort, and construction. Each sample is compared against the original again and again until every detail is right. Only then does big production begin. Do you source footwear from China? Would you like me to share…
❤26👍6🔥1🙏1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @diamosourcing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 390,083 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DIAMO SOURCING🇨🇳” (@diamosourcing), 7,937 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diamosourcing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.