Posted without readable text
❤12👍2👏2

Channel
@diabetkundaligi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,025subscribers
+54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001755493319 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diabetkundaligi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diabetkundaligi |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 1,025 | +19 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 1,006 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 1,001 | +11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 990 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 984 | +10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 974 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 976 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 973 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 971 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 971 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
251 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 120 | 47.8% | |
| ❤ | 85 | 33.9% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 3.98% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 3.19% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 3.19% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.39% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.99% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.59% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.797% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.398% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @diabetkundaligi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
❤12👍2👏2
Ҳеч 0.2 единицани кўрганмисиз?! Мана шу томчича 0.2 единица) Инсулиновая помпада 0.05 единица қилса ҳам бўлади! Ҳамма инсулин зарар деяётган бир вақтда Ман 0.2 единицани бунча ширин, бунча кам бу деб ўтирибман) Инсулин организм учун зарар эмас! Соғлом одам танасида ҳам инсулин бораканки сиз қилаётган инсулин ҳеч қачон зарар бўлмайди!
👍15😁3😍2❤1
24 соатлик сахарлиззи кўрсатинг деб сўрийсилаку, мана 24 соатмас ҳар минутдагилари. файл ичига кириб пастдан тепага кўриб чиқсела бўлади)
❤7👍4😍2
No comment)
👍8❤3👏2
Энг оғизда эридиган гўштли пирог🫠 Ҳамирини ҳар доим қаймоққа қиламан, ҳам юмшоқ ҳам сочный бўлади)
❤9
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥4😍4🎉2
Анчадан бери гаплашмабмиз-а?! 🤔💭 Келинглар, бугун диабетдаги мифлар ва фактлар ҳақида гаплашамиз: 🩺📊 ❌ Миф: • Инсулин кўп олиш керак эмас, зарарли ва ўрганиб қолади; ✅ Аслида эса: • Ҳозирги инсулинлар соғлом одам организмидаги инсулин билан бир хил бўлиб, мутлақо зарарсиз. Шунингдек, инсулинни танадаги инсулинга бўлган талабга яраша қилиш керак. 💉✨ ❌ Миф: • Диабетда диета қилиш керак; ✅ Аслида эса: • 1-тур диабе…
👍22❤11⚡3❤🔥2🤗1
#2 Инсулин организм учун зарарми? #1 1 тур қандди диабет ҳақида қисқача👈🏻 #2 Инсулин организм учун зарарми? #3 Инсулин қилинган жойингиз без бўлиб қолмаслиги учун нима қилиш керак? #4 Гипогликемия нима? Гиподан тўғри чиқишни биласизми?! Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/diabet_kundaligi/ Каналга уланиш учун: https://t.me/diabetkundaligi
❤8👍4
#6 1 тур қандли диабетда диета қилинадими?? Докторим этган дозани ўз вақтида овоман лекин сахарим тушмаяпти ёки ошиб кетвотди! Видеода шу саволга жавоб топамиз👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 #1 1 тур қандди диабет ҳақида қисқача👈🏻 #2 Инсулин организм учун зарарми? #3 Инсулин қилинган жойингиз без бўлиб қолмаслиги учун нима қилиш керак? #4 Гипогликемия нима? Гиподан тўғри чиқишни биласизми?! #5 Қандли диабетда Гипергликемия нима? Ins…
❤6👍2
No comment)
👍16❤3⚡2
5 йилдан бери даволовчи шифокорим Адҳам Олимович! Диабет мактабларида ўқиб чиққанимдан кейин билимларим мустаҳкамланган. ! Бу реклама эмас, клиника ёки докторимдан бу маълумот учун ҳеч нарса олмайман!!! Адҳам Олимович - тажрибали эндокринолог ҳамда клиникада бош шифокор. Замонавий билмлар эгаси деб айта оламан, сабаби инсулин зарар эмаслигини, диабет аслида оғир касаллик эмас, 1чи тур диабетда диета қилинмаслигин…
👍22❤7💯4⚡1👌1
16 йиллик диабет билан қанақа яшаш мумкин ва 16 йилдан кейин аҳволим қанақа бўларкан деб ўйлаган бўсез - бугун мана сизга битта мисол!) Мақтанмоқчи эмасман! Шунчаки диабет бу ҳукум дегани ёки қаттиқ касаллик эмаслигини, соғлом одамдан (диабети йўқ одамни назарда тутвоман) ҳам соғлом бўлиш мумкинлигини этмоқчиман. Фақат харакат қилинг, назорат қилинг. Баъзи витаминларим кам чиққан лекин умумий ҳисобда жудаям яхши, …
👍19❤3⚡2👏1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @diabetkundaligi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Анализларимни бирга кўрамизми?!
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Diabet kundaligi” (@diabetkundaligi), 1,025 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diabetkundaligi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.