Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DHyTecno

Channel

DHyTecno

@dhytecno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,087subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357167470
TypeChannel
Username@dhytecno
Created4 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dhytecno

Growth

1,0761,0871,081.57 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,078 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,076 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,078 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,087 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,074–1,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 02:571,087+4
21 Aug 2026, 15:361,083+5
18 Aug 2026, 04:021,078+2
15 Aug 2026, 10:061,076-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:121,078-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:061,079no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:531,079first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 1,087 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total162
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4961.3%
👍1113.8%
👏911.3%
🔥45.00%
😡33.75%
🎉11.25%
👌11.25%
🙏11.25%
🤨11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC162 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hola! Cómo andan? Por acá volviendo a la rutina después de unos días de descanso. Poniéndome "al día" con algunas lecturas que me fui guardando, me encontré con esta nota sobre cómo usan la IA algunos/as escritores/as españoles/as. Una escritora dice; "Es como tener a alguien siempre disponible para llevarte la contraria". Supongo que en todas las disciplinas se plantea esta pregunta: ¿Cómo la estamos usando? Algo

13 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC327 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nuevo #PensarLasTIC 💡 ¿Qué diferencia hay entre la ruleta que aparecía en la mesa de mis abuelos y las plataformas de apuestas online de hoy? A partir de un recuerdo de infancia, en esta nota analizo cómo cambió la experiencia del juego cuando pasó al entorno digital: disponibilidad permanente, algoritmos que conocen nuestros hábitos, notificaciones, promociones, publicidad invasiva y estrategias de retención que bu

🔥2👏1

2 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC424 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nuevo convenio de la OIT reconoce la IA como herramienta de gestión laboral y sienta un precedente histórico https://www.derechosdigitales.org/recursos/nuevo-convenio-de-la-oit-reconoce-la-ia-como-herramienta-de-gestion-laboral-y-sienta-un-precedente-historico/ Por: Laura Mantilla-León | Analista de Políticas Públicas "Entre el 1 y 12 de junio, Ginebra reunió a representantes de gobiernos, empleadores y personas tr

1👏1

29 Jun 2026, 13:39 UTC501 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

‼️ Buen día! Les comparto una iniciativa que estamos circulando desde sociedad civil y academia vinculada con el proyecto de Ley de Súper RIGI (de Argentina 🇦🇷): El proyecto de ley denominado Régimen de Incentivo para Grandes Inversiones en Nuevas Industrias (Súper RIGI) obtuvo media sanción en la Cámara de Diputados y será tratado por el Senado. 💪 Convocamos a la comunidad académica y científica a formar parte de

6👍1

23 Jun 2026, 19:16 UTC432 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📳 Impunidad Artificial para la IA: sociedad civil alerta sobre avance del "Súper RIGI" en el Congreso ℹ️ https://aadeaa.org/alertasobre-avance-del-super-rigi-en-el-congreso/ 🛑 Organizaciones de la sociedad civil consideran que el proyecto de Súper RIGI, que podría obtener mañana media sanción en Diputados, constituye una entrega de soberanía que desregula el sector tecnológico y abre la puerta a un experimento para

👍1

22 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC387 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¿Están obsoletas las matemáticas? Los investigadores replantean para qué sirven en la era de la IA. Les comparto esta nota que creo que les puede interesar. Y Vamos Argentina! 🇦🇷

1

15 Jun 2026, 00:15 UTC506 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ya salió la edición de junio de #PensarLasTIC 💡 Esta vez escribí sobre la muerte del Indio Solari, la importancia de los espacios públicos y de los encuentros colectivos en tiempos cada vez más mediados por algoritmos. También analizo el Gemelo Digital Social anunciado por el Gobierno y algunas preguntas: ¿qué pasa cuando las políticas públicas empiezan a definirse a partir de sistemas de IA? ¿Quién controla esos s

4👏1

11 Jun 2026, 15:21 UTC522 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Buenas! Espero que estén teniendo un lindo día, a pesar de todo. En medio de todo lo que está pasando, paso por acá para compartirles este conversatorio que se llevó a cabo la semana pasada sobre tecnologías de vigilancia estatal, organizado por Fundación Vía Libre, CELS, ODIA y Democracia en Red. https://www.youtube.com/live/QkpW72pvO9k?si=vyGaAlWN3pDKdZRt

7

20 May 2026, 19:29 UTC611 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👋 Hola, ¿cómo andan? Paso por acá para compartirles una nueva columna de Sergio Sorin para #DHyTecno La inteligencia artificial suele presentarse como el nuevo juguete de la humanidad. Pero, como plantea esta columna, ese entusiasmo tecnológico convive con riesgos bastante más profundos: concentración de poder, usos militares, ausencia de controles efectivos y amenazas para nuestra casa común. ¿Quiénes están defini

3👍2

19 May 2026, 11:33 UTC361 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hola! 👋 Hoy vengo con una invitación distinta. Este jueves voy a estar presentando mi libro de cuentos junto a Sebastián De Toma, que estará presentando su libro de poesía. Los libros y la lectura son la excusa para juntarnos a pasar un lindo momento, escuchar música, tomar algo, estar entre amigxs. Para quienes anden por Buenos Aires, quedan invitados 🎶🍷

10👌1👏1

13 May 2026, 14:00 UTC436 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Comparto esta información que puede ser de su interés 👇 CURSOS DE PROFUNDIZACIÓN 2026 🗣️ El Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas Fray Bartolomé de las Casas (IFBC) invita a inscribirse en sus cursos de profundización: 👉🏼 Estrategias jurídicas ante la emergencia climática 👉🏼 El rol judicial y el desafío de las tecnologías emergentes 🎯 Con esta propuesta, el IFBC busca revisar y complejizar problemáticas urgente

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dhytecno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 375,302 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DHyTecno” (@dhytecno), 1,087 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dhytecno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.